Leaked documents suggest Priti Patel and PM advisors helped secure £102.6m PPE deal

Boris Johnson

Legal action is being taken against the government over another controversial PPE contract. At the heart of the case is a company that denies it had a Tory donor lobby for its multimillion PPE deal, despite him claiming he was a consultant for the firm.

The Good Law Project has also stated that it holds documents linking the home secretary Priti Patel and Boris Johnson’s advisor Munira Mirza to contracts awarded to Pharmaceutical Direct Ltd (PDL).

Questions have also been raised surrounding former Conservative candidate and donor Samir Jassal’s involvement in securing the contract after he was named on official Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) documents. PDL has told us that Jassal was not employed by PDL, but he says he was a consultant for the firm.

Furthermore, the DHSC is accused of breaching UK law by not publishing the details of the £102.6m PPE contract which was given to PDL without competition. This has come up in multiple legal cases regarding the government’s unlawful coronavirus (Covid-19) contracts.

Documents claim that Priti Patel helped secure the deal

The Good Law Project has stated that  Mirza and Patel, intervened to help two ‘middlemen’ secure the contracts for PDL:

We hold documents showing or suggesting that:

Both Boris Johnson’s controversial adviser Munira Mirza and the Home Secretary Priti Patel intervened to help middlemen win two enormous contracts for PDL;

Read on...

The first middleman was Samir Jassal. He is a Conservative councillor who has been photographed with Boris Johnson, Theresa May, David Cameron, and has personal links to Priti Patel, and a string of other high profile Conservative figures;

The second middleman was Surbjit Shergill. A company he owned went from £200 in value to almost £10m in value in the year of the pandemic. Documents leaked to Good Law Project suggest he billed PDL over £16m for his services;

The £28.8m contract was won shortly after a direct intervention by Priti Patel – and was above the average market price.

Despite The Good Law Projects statement, PDL claim that Jassal was not employed by the company and deny that lobbying for contracts took place.

PDL claims Jassal wasn’t an employee

After reports cited Jassal as the named representative on DHSC documents, PDL told The Canary that it did use a contractor to secure the multimillion pound contract, but it wasn’t Jassal.

PDL’s director Bemal Patel stated:

We are aware of media reports published this week which contain a material inaccuracy stating that the contact name appearing on the relevant contract (which was redacted in the published version) is Mr Samir Jassal. This is incorrect.

Bemal Patel insisted that Jassal is not employed by PDL:

As is not uncommon, PDL engaged a contractor to deal with that process (getting the contract) on its behalf. That contractor is not Mr Jassal. For the avoidance of doubt, Mr Jassal wasn’t employed by PDL.

But the Tory donor says he was a ‘consultant’ for the firm

But in an interview with the BBC, Jassal claimed that he was a consultant for the firm.

The allegations come under the backdrop of several legal cases against the UK government for breaking transparency laws under public contract regulations.

Now, the Good Law Project has stated it will get answers as it kicks off legal action again the DHSC in a case that specifically names Jassal.

Director of the Good Law Project Jolyon Maugham stated:

We already knew that Boris Johnson had misled Parliament when he insisted in February 2021 that all COVID contracts were now “on the record”. Now we’ve uncovered a new contract that makes further nonsense of that claim.

The Good Law Project has been vocal about its concerns about Jassal’s involvement in the deal:

Samir Jassal is a well-connected figure within the Conservative Party. A two-time Conservative Party parliamentary candidate and former councillor, he has met Boris Johnson on at least three occasions, with the last meeting held in October 2020.

“Mr Jassal is not a director or shareholder of PDL”

While the pre-action letter claims that Jassal is not a director or shareholder of PDL, it claims that he has close links to prime minister Boris Johnson and home secretary Priti Patel.

According to The Good Law Project:

  • Jassal is not a director or shareholder of PDL. Nor is he referred to on PDL’s website.
  • Open source research indicates that Jassal: describes himself on LinkedIn as a ‘Healthcare & Pharmaceutical Partner’, but doesn’t say who he works for.
  • He was previously a Conservative party counsellor and deputy leader of Gravesham Borough Council.
  • Jassal was also the ‘BME policy director’ in Kent.
  • Jassal stood for election as a Conservative MP twice, once in 2015 and in 2017, and was ‘supported by Boris Johnson and Sajid Javid.
  • From 2014-2015 he worked as an advisor to Priti Patel and assistant to Zac Goldsmith’s campaign.
  • His most recent meeting with Boris Johnson was in October 2020 but they have met on a ‘number of occasions’.

It’s not clear why Jassal was named on the documents, or whether this was an ‘error’ as reported in the press. We contacted the DHSC to ask why the documents were redacted and why Jassal’s name was published if he wasn’t the named contractor, but it failed to respond.

However, while the focus has been on Jassal’s alleged involvement in securing this contract, there has been little mention of PDL’s history of securing government PPE contracts.

It was the second PPE contract, racking up a total of £131.4 m

We spoke to the Good Law Project about this. It confirmed that there was a contract awarded to PDL in May 2020. This contract was also granted without competition:

This £102.6 million contract is not the only one handed to Pharmaceuticals Direct by the Department for Health and Social Care – the firm received an earlier PPE contract in May 2020, worth £28.8 million. Both deals were directly awarded to the firm without any competition.

This means that in 2020 alone PDL secured deals worth at least £131.4m. These contracts went unchallenged and undisclosed for months, breaking the government’s own public contracts law.

PDL turned over more than £50m

According to a statement released to The Canary, PDL made a profit of £1.3m in 2020 after tax and turned over more than £50m:

Together with its associated healthcare businesses, PDL is a substantial and well-established supplier to the healthcare sector. With a group annual turnover exceeding £50,000,000, the business is proud of its successful track record of procurement and supply to various medical organisations, including supplying NHS bodies.

However, the Good Law Project claims that the government has been in a state of “amnesia” when it comes to its legal obligations. Specifically, around its failure to publish PDL’s contract, it stated:

The more details that we uncover on PPE contracts, the more serious the questions that arise. In this case Government’s apparent amnesia when it comes to its legal obligations has prevented timely public scrutiny of a multi-million pound direct award to a Tory party member and donor.

Despite claims that Jassal was not the contractor who secured the multimillion pound deal, the Good Law Project continues with its case against the DHSC with Jassal at the front of its campaign. The case is just one of several the Good Law Project is pursuing to force the government to be transparent and accountable over its coronavirus contracts.

We contacted the DHSC and PDL who both declined to comment further about the legal action case. PDL is yet to reveal who they contracted to secure the multimillion pound deal.

Featured Image: Wikimedia Commons –  EU2017EE Estonian Presidency

Get involved

You can stay up to date with this series by bookmarking our #FollowTheMoney series, or find our latest investigations here.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I have read all of the court documentation released by “The Good Law Project” regarding this matter. I am left with no doubt whatsoever that this Government is as bent as the proverbial 9 Bob Note. £14 Billion in contracts to the most dodgy of dodgy companies. How can a mouse killing company “Pestfix” with assets (at time of contract award) of £18 thousand pounds win a PPE contract worth £108,000,000? The DHSC were ordered by the court to produce evidence documentation and failed on four deadline dates to provide it. They then produced the documentation 7 hours before the hearing, all 12,200 pages of it. All relevant names REDACTED, all pertinent detail REDACTED, all emails to/from/subject REDACTED. Make your own mind up, but this stinks to high heaven.

    2. We live in the age of the cliche; Pigs at the trough,
      -Poverty wants much; but avarice, everything,
      -Fraud is the daughter of greed ,
      -Stealing to eat isn’t criminal-stealing to be rich is………

      Or are these tory party mantras’…….

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.