The coronavirus crisis is proving our current economic system to be a death cult

Peter Bolton

In the weeks since the new coronavirus (Covid-19) has spread around the globe, the stock market has been going haywire with abrupt ups and downs. In the midst of the chaos, the US government has been on the fence about how to respond. The reason is simple – the US capitalist economy isn’t built to handle this kind of crisis; it’s built to maintain constant growth and profit.

Do we really need the stock market?

On 12 March, US stock markets suffered their biggest drop since the infamous ‘Black Monday’ of 1987. Markets were shut down via so-called ‘circuit breaker’ measures that were enacted after stock values fell by over 7% within minutes of the opening of trading on Thursday morning. There was a brief rebound the following day when, on 13 March, Donald Trump announced emergency measures including a deal with corporate giants such as Google, Target, and Walmart to expand testing for the virus.

But on 18 March, markets tumbled again, almost entirely wiping out Trump’s touted economic gains since he became president. Stocks continued to plunge for days thereafter until, on 24 March, lawmakers and media outlets alike raised the possibility that stock markets should be temporarily shut down. Amidst these calls, a member of the US congress made a startling admission. Pointing out that “short-sellers” – traders who essentially bet on stocks falling during a downturn – will likely take advantage of the situation, representative Joe Manchin said “It’s not an industry that we have to have.”

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




The Trump administration, however, has responded to these shutdown calls by arguing that “our country wasn’t built to be shut down.” Here, Trump is actually spot on; and he perhaps unwittingly exposed the parasitism of the country’s casino-capitalist system and its ill-suitedness to working in times of crisis.

Inherent instability

As economic theorist Hyman Minsky pointed out, financial systems in advanced capitalist economies are inherently unstable. Minksy wrote that “The processes which make for financial instability are an inescapable part of any decentralized capitalist economy.” And the reason for this is straightforward; these economies are based to a large extent not on actual production but rather on speculation. So much so that the fate of the economy is increasingly determined by complex kinds of speculation that only those who work in the business really understand.

‘Socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor’

As a result of this instability, capitalist economies tend to suffer from periodic and increasingly severe crises. The stock market crash of 1929, for example, led to the Great Depression in the US. And in a cruel irony, Western governments have needed to intervene in order to save the capitalist economies from imploding – destroying the right-wing myth of ‘small government’.

Unfettered market capitalism actually needs huge levels of government intervention to bail it out when these periodic crises inevitably arise. Following the 2007/8 financial crash, for example, the administrations of both George W. Bush and Barack Obama bailed out the banks whose shady dealings had led to the crisis in the first place, yet gave only measly support to the homeowners who had been hit by subprime mortgage dealings. Noam Chomsky has dubbed this process “socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor”.

Worse still, the economic crisis created by the coronavirus outbreak has rammed home that capitalist economies aren’t based on anything resembling the meeting of human need, but on maintaining profits in an increasingly imaginary world of arcane financial instruments whose values are bet upon by financial sector insiders.

A death cult

The twisted logic of this system has now reached peak absurdity. Some of its supporters now essentially claim that people should accept their own death in the service of neverending growth and profit. On 23 March, for example, one Texas politician said ‘grandparents’ should consider risking their lives by rejecting social distancing for the sake of “keeping the America that all America loves for your children and grandchildren”. This, of course, meant protecting his Republican Party’s orthodoxy of unfettered ‘free’-market capitalism – at all costs.

This has exposed the fact that modern capitalism is not just inherently unstable, unsustainable, and unsuited to meeting the needs of humankind, but has degenerated into nothing short of a death cult. Capitalist governments are now scrambling to maintain endless growth and profit – no matter what the cost in human death and suffering.

‘Socialism or barbarism’

If there’s one silver lining to the outbreak, it’s that it’s exposed how hopelessly outdated, unworkable, and inhuman the West’s cherished economic status quo really is. In the year 2020, we are now truly learning what Rosa Luxemburg meant when she spoke about the crossroads between “transition to socialism or regression into barbarism”.

Featured image via Flickr – Quoteinspector.com

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. This article really hits the nail on the head; how many decent businesses, with full order books, workers with their sleeves rolled up ready to “get stuck in”, and healthy bank balances, have been forced to shut up shop, lay off workers, leave customers and investors flat-footed, because some yuppie, who nothing more than the company’s name and its share price, decides to “short” its shares? The whole stock exchange system is a parasite on the world and should be abilished, and all its members should be rounded up, given a pick and shovel, and made to do a real job of useful productive work for the first time in their entire useless lives; of course, they would probably all complain that the “commies” had sent them to the “gulag”!

    2. I agree with Stangya. What strikes me is how the “free market system”, is anything but free. If it’s “free”, there’s no need for circuit-breakers to prevent share prices falling. Similarly, no need for “stimulus packages” in a free market. The free market is a myth to arrive at what you say in the article – capitalism for the poor. The other striking feature of much-lauded capitalism is how easily it goes into crisis, and how utterly unable it is to actually respond to people’s needs. What is helping people now, is socialism. When this is all over, I’m in favour of revolution, to end Westminster for good in favour of a massively decentralised system of decision-making down to a local, granular level, to end any vestige of monarchy, to re-common all the land stolen by the aristocracy, and the turning of all corporations into worker-owned co-operatives.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.