The new revelations about Boris Johnson’s behaviour might be shocking, but they’re not surprising

Boris Johnson

An investigation published in the Sunday Times has revealed that Boris Johnson missed five emergency meetings between January and March 2020. The meetings of the government’s national crisis committee ‘Cobra’ took place as the coronavirus (Covid-19) crisis continued to grow globally.

The article reports:

As Britain was hit by unprecedented flooding, [Johnson] completed the EU withdrawal, reshuffled his cabinet and then went away to the grace-and-favour country retreat at Chevening where he spent most of the two weeks over half-term with his pregnant fiancée, Carrie Symonds.

Vote for a clown…

The revelations in the Sunday Times almost read like a cheesy film plot, where an entitled, self-absorbed head of state just wants to do fun things instead of real head-of-state-work – except people are dying in real life because of it.

While the news that Johnson, as prime minister, missed not one but five emergency meetings to address the national response to a global pandemic is shocking, it’s not surprising. I say this because anyone who’s been paying attention will already know that Johnson has a track record for being both unreliable and untrustworthy.

Let’s not forget, this is the same man who, prior to the December 2019 election, was absent at leaders’ debates and hid inside a fridge to avoid being interviewed. So evading accountability seems to be something Johnson has had practice with.

Many establishment journalists seem surprised at Johnson’s absence during a major crisis. Yet, their reporting played a role in getting Johnson elected. As The Canary’s Kerry-Anne Mendoza said, “Elect a clown, get the circus”:

Read on...

“When someone shows you who they are…”

As award-winning author Maya Angelou once said, “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time”. Unfortunately, the British public refused to do so.

As foreign secretary, Johnson had already proved himself to be incompetent at best. He repeatedly failed Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, the British citizen imprisoned in Iran, possibly even worsening her situation. His time as mayor of London followed a similar pattern of broken promises and expensive mistakes. Most famously, the garden bridge, his vanity project which never materialised, cost the taxpayer a whopping £53m.

So the signs were all there. Johnson had proven himself to be unreliable, untrustworthy, incompetent, and evasive well before the December 2019 election. The British public elected him anyway – they don’t get to be surprised now that Johnson’s handling of the coronavirus crisis is consistent with his track record so far.

“Part-time prime minister”

It’s unfortunate for everyone in this country that not only did someone like Johnson get elected, but that he’s now in charge during the worst global crisis in recent memory. Even before the pandemic hit, Johnson’s performance as PM was questionable. Most notably, he was largely absent while floods devastated Northern and Welsh communities. As a result, then opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn slammed Johnson for being a “part-time Prime Minister”.

But even with regard to the pandemic itself, the examples of Johnson’s incompetence are both numerous and inexcusable. These include:

  • Missing EU meetings on the supply of ventilators – initially because of not seeing an email, although Johnson later said: “We are no longer members of the EU”. The vanity of this statement aside, it ignores the fact that we’re still in a transition period until December 2020.
  • ‘Herd immunity’ and delay in lockdown – initially, the government’s strategy was very clearly based on the majority of the population catching the virus. The delay in enforcing lockdown was likely motivated by a desire to protect economic interests. There was also nowhere near the required amount of testing or contact-tracing in the government’s proposed plan. The ‘herd immunity’ approach was heavily criticised by WHO and scientists.
  • PPE shortages – on 18 March, Johnson claimed in parliament that “we have stockpiles of PPE”. But acute PPE shortages in hospitals now suggest this was yet another of his many recorded lies.
The role of corporate media

The billionaire-owned corporate media no doubt played a critical role in Johnson getting elected. So it’s ironic that the Times is now publishing this report. In an article for the same outlet published before the 2019 election, former Conservative politician Michael Portillo made a case for why he had become “a Boris believer”. The article featured an image of Johnson with a halo around his head.

People like Piers Morgan, who viciously attacked and maligned Corbyn as being antisemitic, no doubt contributing to Johnson’s election victory, seem to have had a sudden crisis of conscience. Meanwhile, Robert Peston, who appears increasingly to be a cog in Johnson’s propaganda machine, said he was “literally gobsmacked” by the recent disclosures.

Given media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s links with Johnson, and his paper’s role in protecting Johnson’s public image, the corporate media bears more than a little responsibility for Johnson being in power. For them to now gasp in shock, and pat themselves on the back for finally doing their jobs, is just plain disingenuous.

Johnson’s entire political career has been typified by spin and clever PR, and his time as prime minister is no different. The latest opinion polls show the highest government approval rating in a decade. People didn’t believe Johnson all the times he showed himself to be untrustworthy, unreliable, immoral, and racist and elected him anyway. Will they remember Johnson’s most recent mistakes and incompetence long enough to actually hold him to account this time? Considering everything he’s already gotten away with so far, I’d say probably not.

Featured image via YouTube/ Guardian News

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. A pedant writes: Johnson is not, as you at least imply, “head of state”. In a constitutional monarchy, that’s the monarch. In a republic with a non-executive presidency (e.g. Germany, Italy), it’s the president. In both these cases, the prime minister (Chancellor, President of the Council of Ministers) is the head of GOVERNMENT.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.