These are the actions the police took against ordinary people on the days Dominic Cummings flouted lockdown

Police make arrest and Dominic Cummings
Emily Apple

The indignation and downright rage at Dominic Cummings’ actions isn’t going anywhere. And nor should it. People across the country have seen loved ones die alone, cared for children while sick, and been unable to see their families. We have all taken action that goes against our instincts. And we’ve taken that action for the greater good. It’s because we’ve wanted to control the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic that the majority of us have followed the rules. Because the majority of us can work out that it’s not about what’s right for us, it’s about what’s right for society as a whole.

Cummings might deny that he’s done anything wrong or broken any laws. He might not have any regrets. He may think that he took the steps any reasonable parent would – well any reasonable parent who had a whole separate house to travel to on a family estate might take (yep – hands up who that applies to!). However, outside of cabinet members and Daily Mail commentator Dan Hodges, it’s hard to find anyone who agrees with that analysis.

But while Cummings was taking his jaunt to Durham, let’s take a look at what police across the UK were doing on those days. Because they clearly show that there’s one rule for the elite and another rule for the rest of us

Policing the coronavirus

When the new coronavirus powers were introduced, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) and the Undercover Research Group (URG) set up an online diary to:

monitor the everyday impact of the new policing powers and whether they are used proportionately.

And policing has been extreme, and in some cases distressing and horrific. For example, a Black man was tasered in front of his young child at a petrol station in Manchester. As the Guardian reported:

Shortly after he puts the child, who can be heard screaming “Daddy” throughout the footage, on the ground, the man is Tasered by one of the policemen.

Meanwhile in London, the Met police used the pandemic as a reason to increase its number of stop and searches despite this being irrelevant to coronavirus law. In some London boroughs, the number of stop and searches was twice as high in April as it was in March.

27 – 30 March

On 27 March, despite his wife having symptoms of coronavirus, and government instructions that the whole household should self-isolate, Cummings drove hundreds of miles to Durham. The following morning, Cummings woke up with symptoms of coronavirus. Durham police confirm that they were made aware that he had travelled there on 30 March.

Here are some examples from the Policing the Coronavirus blog of actions the police took against individuals during those dates. And it’s important to remember that these actions weren’t even taken against symptomatic people or those from symptomatic households as Cummings was. Some were even taken against key workers:

In West Yorkshire, Netpol reported that it had been informed police officers had yesterday stopped two care workers, both in their uniforms, who were sharing a car on the way to work a 12-hour shift together at an old people’s home. The driver was fined £60. The two-metre social distancing rule cannot apply to them, as many residents they support require two carers.

Meanwhile, in Lancashire, during the weekend of 28-29 March, police issued 123 fines, and police in Warrington:

fined six people over the weekend, including for being ‘out for a drive due to boredom’ and ‘multiple people from the same household going to the shops for non-essential items’.

And in Manchester:

man with a history of mental health problems [has] been ordered to pay a £500 fine, £85 prosecution costs and a £50 victim surcharge after he refused to obey coronavirus lockdown restrictions.

Easter weekend

Police were out in force to ensure the rules weren’t broken during a sunny bank holiday weekend. And while Cummings took a drive to test his eyesight (and really, this ludicrous and dangerous excuse is beyond words) this is how the police were enforcing the lockdown.

In Manchester, a man was violently arrested for the crime of “taking a tree from his mum’s house”:

And the day before Cummings sat on a bench in Barnard Castle, in Glasgow:

a disabled woman returning home very heavy groceries was threatened with a fine for sitting down to rest because she “wasn’t exercising”.

While Johnson claims that Cummings was following his “instincts” as a father, this is allegedly what happened to a woman feeding her baby. Sussex police deny this incident took place:

Other police enforcement taking place included forcing people to move on:

 in Hampshire while resting during a cycle ride, using a gated communal garden outside their block or driving to a park with a baby.

And in Chesterfield:

 police had to issue an apology to a disabled man for [a] ‘misunderstanding’ over gardening after his friend was threatened with a fine for helping him, despite the government advice specifically listing support for vulnerable people as a reason to leave home.

One law for them. One law for us.

The letter of the law is often wrong, misguided, or misleading, whether it’s coronavirus or any other aspect of the legal system. This isn’t a piece arguing that we should all always follow the rules or that there was any justification in the police’s actions. In most of the cases in this piece, their actions were at worst unlawful, and at best misguided and overreaching. And in the case of coronavirus, most of us follow the rules because, however difficult, it’s the right thing to do, not because we’ve been coerced by the state to do it.

But that’s not the point. The point is this is how ordinary citizens, those of us not part of the ruling elite, have been and are being treated. Cummings showed pure arrogance in taking the trip. And in not even apologising, let alone resigning, he’s displayed breathtaking contempt for every single person who has acted not in their own best interests but in the interests of society as a whole.

However, we shouldn’t be surprised. It’s a clear manifestation of the contempt Conservative-led governments have treated us with for over ten years. After all, this is a party that punished the poorest people in society to bail out the richest. It’s a government that instituted a policy of austerity that a report found caused at least 130,000 deaths.

Self-interest is at the heart of Conservative government policy. This has always been clear. Cummings’ actions are just the latest in a long line of government actions that benefit the elite while giving a giant fuck-you to ordinary working people.

The Tories have been fighting a class war against poor and vulnerable people for years. This latest incident is just a stark reminder of exactly how ruthless they are. The question for the rest of us remains the same – what are we going to do about it?

Featured image via Twitter – Netpol / YouTube – The Independent

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. We have always known that the rich and powerful do as they like and more often than not get away with it but Cummings has literally added insult to injury by expecting us to believe his ludicrous explanations which fly in the face of any logic. Who on believing they may be too ill to look after their child makes the decision to put that child in a car and drive 250 miles adding the jeopardy of driving putting his family and other road users at risk. Who goes to a second home prohibited even to those without symptoms simply to have groceries delivered which with his wealth he could have arranged easily in London or failing that the council would have arranged. Who tests their eyesight by driving a 2 ton lethal weapon and quite by accident ending up at a beauty spot. If he’d told the truth he would more than likely have got away with it. Just look at Boris’s record for evidence of that but he chooses to treat us as idiots as well.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.