Far-right figures have threatened action – including street riots – after the UK government threatened to ban Twitter/X over potential images of undressed children. At the same time, US politicians have threatened to sanction the whole UK if the ban were implemented.
We will ‘fight X ban on the streets’
Owner Elon Musk didn’t want to change the platform’s ‘Grok’ AI to prevent users asking it to remove clothes from images. Keir Starmer said he wanted regulator Ofcom to use “use all its powers – up to and including an effective ban” if X did not agree to the change, citing the risk of the AI being used to create child abuse images.
Starmer’s threat prompted far-right MP Rupert Lowe to vow to fight the ban in Parliament. Extremist Tommy Robinson said he and his followers would “fight it on the streets”. Neither, of course, mentioned that the proposed ban was to protect children:

Not to be outdone, Trumpian far-righter Anna Paulina Luna threatened to sanction the whole UK if the ban is imposed:

Apparently, while the US regime thought banning TikTok to protect Israel was perfectly fair, anyone considering banning a US platform is beyond the pale, even when the reason given is to protect children. Luna describes herself as a ‘right to life extremist‘, but like many Republicans perhaps her concern for children ends once they’re born.
Of course, it would be foolish to think that ‘kid-starver’ Starmer gives a four-x for protecting children. However, he never saw an opportunity for censorship that he didn’t like and he is perfectly to exploit the idea of protecting children to push through political censorship like his so-called ‘Online Safety Act’.
Will it come to that?
In the end, X appears to have tried to settle the issue before any ban. Not be preventing people from AI-stripping women and kids, but by making them pay for the privilege. Victims’ groups have described the move as ‘insulting’.
We are left then with an ugly spectacle all round. Starmer pretends to care about children to take down a platform he doesn’t like; the far-right threatens violence and sanctions to protect a platform that was prepared to put kids at risk; while X simply moves its child-porn-enabled AI behind a paywall.
If nothing else, it’s a unique way of showing the awfulness of all stripes of fascist – red, blue, teal or orange.













I think you need to be more nuanced i ykud critique of all involved. The real villains in this are first Musk, then the far right & the Nazi T. Robinson and the US Rightwing govt.
X is a blatantly fascist media op with Musk calling Grok Machine Hitler.
For once Starmer is doing the right thing and the main problem is if he has the balls to stand up to US Tech fascists and their govt which act on their behalf.
So Tommy Robinsons mob are go to riot to defend their right to create and swop pictures of naked children on X. Sort of seems to fit their logic Next they will be defending child abuse itself as an human right Their campaign was never againgst child abuse itself but against Muslims
The high number of convicted child sex offenders among Tommy’s old mates in the EDL is legendary.
Starmer has been cosying up to the criminal in the White House since January 2025 so why all of a sudden is he risking sanctions and tariffs? The new trade agreement with the US is not worth the paper of the verbal agreements because the criminal in chief will never uphold any agreement if he deems it unfavourable to his wealth generation.
Good question, why.
He appears to be placing dislike of child pornography a b o v e his adoration of the USA and all its wiles (and especially proxy states). To me, this seems extremely unlikely. So, lets just see what happens next. Nothing looks most likely.