In less than three minutes, Labour shows how to fix the economy

Labour economy video
Fréa Lockley

In less than three minutes, a new video from the Labour Party shows just how simple it is to fix the economy.

“It’s just common sense”

The video shows a scenario. It positions five people against one billionaire, asking the question: [0.00]

who’s better for the economy. Ordinary people, or billionaires?

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

In this scenario, the billionaire gets a £20,000 tax break. He pockets the cheque. Meanwhile, five people “who all lost money because of cuts and austerity” get “that money back”. A nurse gets a pay rise; a pensioner receives more pension. A woman in a wheelchair gains disability support as a student is given a grant, and another woman receives a small business loan. Each individual reflects a different aspect of the harsh austerity cuts in place since Conservative-led governments came to power in 2010.

The video shows how these people spend that money in their local community. As they hand money over to local businesses, the “people who get that money, go on to spend it too”. From here, government revenue increases to pay for vital local services such as “roads, hospitals and schools”. It also employs more public sector workers.

Continue reading below...

It’s a fictitious scenario, but it shows how easy it could be to regenerate the economy in local communities.

In contrast, the billionaire hasn’t spent a penny of his tax break. So none of that £20,000 goes back into the local economy.

As the video says, this simple model is “just common sense”.

Change is possible

The video is a simple way to foreground Labour’s economic policy under Jeremy Corbyn. As the 2017 manifesto states, economic success won’t be measured by the “number of billionaires, but by the ability of… people to live richer lives”.

Since Margaret Thatcher was in power, UK economics has been driven by the ‘trickle down’ theory. This insists that helping those with the most money – through tax breaks etc – means money ‘trickles’ back into the local economy. It’s now known that this simply doesn’t work; not just in the UK, but globally. Around the world, 1% of adults hold more than 47% “of household wealth globally”.

When Labour came to power under Tony Blair, there was some hope that economic policy could change. But Blair and Bill Clinton in the US pushed forward neoliberal policies that:

abandoned the left’s traditional commitments, especially to workers, in favour of a global financial elite and the self-serving policies that enriched them; and in doing so… enabled a sickening rise in inequality.

Wealth inequality in the UK has soared. In 2018, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) established that:

44% of the UK’s wealth [is] owned by just 10% of the population, five times the total wealth held by the poorest half.

Without radical change to economic policy, rich people will continue to get richer while poor people get poorer. This video shows just how simple such radical change actually is.

Featured image via YouTube – Labour Party

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Pathetic. This video shows that parts of the Labour party are still talking about economic growth as desirable, consumer spending and building more roads as good. Not one mention of the Green New Deal or the climate crisis.

      I’m a Labour party supporter but this video makes me sick. I moved from the Greens to Labour because I thought Labour believed that business as usual, i.e. supporting road transport and economic growth, was just not viable any more.

      How wrong I was.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.