• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, June 6, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Laura Kuenssberg is eerily quiet about the major attack on the Tories

Fréa Lockley by Fréa Lockley
26 November 2019
in Trending, UK
Reading Time: 2 mins read
166 7
A A
3
Home Trending
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Michael Heseltine has launched a scathing attack on the Conservative Party. The former deputy leader told voters to back the Liberal Democrats instead of voting Tory. You’d think this would be huge news. But Laura Kuenssberg seems eerily quiet on the matter.

Tory voters shouldn’t vote Tory

The BBC did report that Heseltine told Conservative voters to vote for former Conservatives standing as independents or Lib Dem candidates.

On 26 November, Heseltine told BBC Radio 4‘s Today show that it’s a “complete nonsense” that Brexit “can be done by Christmas”. He continued:

I cannot vote or support people who are going to make the country poorer and less influential, full stop, end of story.

Yet the BBC‘s political editor has hardly said a word about this. She did send out one tweet on 25 November, when ITV first reported on Heseltine’s Tory takedown:

Another moment in this 2019 campaign that would have seemed totally bonkers a few years ago https://t.co/BLlpS9rqme

— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) November 25, 2019

But since then, silence.

In contrast…

Her comments about an attack on Jeremy Corbyn by chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis followed immediately after her tweet about Heseltine. But her language is a total contrast.

According to Kuenssberg, this is “unprecedented” and came “blasting” into Labour’s campaign:

Unprecedented for the leader of a major religious group in UK to make this kind of statement in a General Election campaign – and to feel the need to do so – Labour says they have worked extremely hard to combat the problem and Corbyn has fought racism all his life

— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) November 25, 2019

And since then, her Twitter feed contains continual references to attacks on the Labour leader. She did note that Lord Dubs was on BBC Radio 4, but not a whisper or mention of Heseltine. Also, she gave no indication of Dubs’ position:

Perhaps tell your followers what Lord Dubs actually said? As you did with the Chief Rabbi and Archbishop’s comments? Or is it only anti-Corbyn statements that get quoted/amplified? https://t.co/FBokankkG0

— Hicham Yezza (@HichamYezza) November 26, 2019

And, as many people also noticed, the BBC itself downplayed Heseltine’s “anti Tory intervention”, choosing to criticise Corbyn instead:

https://twitter.com/mcquillan_ruth/status/1199226164071587840

https://twitter.com/CollisTim/status/1199229889964134400

In 30 minutes of #r4today this morning, I heard 4 attacks on Jeremy Corbyn – from a rabbi, from Heseltine, from a DUP bigot, and from reading the tabloid headlines. After two recent instances of editing in favour of Johnson, it's clear this is another example of #BBCBiasAndLies. pic.twitter.com/MLkOlEM8KH

— Ivan White (@ivanwhite48) November 26, 2019

During a general election, the media is bound by special rules on political reporting. As Channel 4 notes in its guidance for producers:

These rules are designed to ensure one party or candidate does not get an advantage over the others and exist in addition to the general rules concerning impartiality.

Clearly the BBC’s blatantly disregarding these rules. It’s already been forced to apologise after editing out audience members laughing at Boris Johnson during the leaders’ debate. And Kuenssberg went all out to back Johnson’s manifesto.

When pro-Tory media bias is this blatant, it becomes even more vital how much we need to vote for change on 12 December.

Featured image via YouTube – BBC News

Tags: BBCConservative PartyJeremy Corbyn
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Just one in 20 Black Friday ‘deals’ are cheaper than rest of year, says Which?

Next Post

There’s one crucial sentence missing from the mainstream media’s coverage of the Chief Rabbi’s comments

Next Post
Chief Rabbi and Boris Johnson

There's one crucial sentence missing from the mainstream media's coverage of the Chief Rabbi's comments

Bulldozer brought to PM’s constituency for Johnson to fulfil his Heathrow vow

Jeremy Corbyn and Stormzy

As the voter registration deadline looms, Stormzy nails why so many people are backing Corbyn

Jeremy Corbyn

The figures are in. Corbyn's nationalisation plans would save us billions.

Jeremy Corbyn and the door of Number 10

Despite the Tory lies, leading economists say Labour should 'form the next government'

Comments 3

  1. nobodylicksme says:
    7 years ago

    “I cannot vote for people who are going to take away my £95K EU landowners grand and leave me 95 grand a year poorer, full stop, end of.” Michael Heseltine, who demands his welfare for the rich but doesn’t give one flying fuck for millions of people left destitute, homeless and starving by his own vile government.

    Reply
  2. Smythe-Mogg says:
    7 years ago

    Unfortunately, news media have embraced culture of personality wherein persons hired to present and analyse news become a ‘medium’ obfuscating the ‘message’. The people-funded BBC must change the contractual terms of presenters on its payroll. Setting aside often grossly excessive emoluments arising from a pseudo-market for ‘talent’ within entertainment industries, there is the matter of clearly defined professional responsibilities. This particularly during election campaigns.

    Behind the scenes editors decide what is news. Household-name presenters and analysts carry the BBC’s imprimatur of competence, diligence, and general respectability: they are the BBC so far as viewers and listeners are concerned. We inhabit a world immersed in social media. Every twit with a mind to is free to twitter endlessly. Within that maelstrom of inanity well known figures carry vicarious authority regardless of the content of their contributions.

    Thus, during contentious public discourse household-name people ‘fronting’ BBC programmes ought be forbidden from engaging in social media conversation pertaining to the disputed issue.

    Reply
  3. themagicmancunian100 says:
    7 years ago

    Why was this never a headline: WORLD’S GREATEST LINGUISITIC PHILOSOPHER SAYS HE WOULD VOTE FOR CORBYN. ?
    Is Rabbi Mirvis a more important figure than Noam Chomsky? Won’t he be soon forgotten while Chomsky’s work will endure? Why should a rabbi’s intervention be treated by the BBC and other media as so important? Because he’s a rabbi? Because he’s the Chief Rabbi? Well, haven’t leading members of the Catholic Church engaged in child abuse? Should we be deferential to religious leaders because they’re religious leaders? Surely there is far more reason to respect and listen to Chomsky. He is one the greatest intellectuals of modern times. Doesn’t that make him more significant than a time-serving cleric?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Orientalism
Explainer

Orientalism — What Edward Said can teach us about the US-Israeli war against Iran

by Tchanguize Mahmoodzadeh
6 June 2026
Palestine
Global

Palestine — Ministry of Health in financial crisis because of ‘Israel’

by Charlie Jaay
6 June 2026
Oxford Union
Skwawkbox

OU debate proceeds tonight with banned anti-genocide speakers attending virtually

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
DUP
Analysis

Series of hate displays in north of Ireland tacitly condoned by DUP

by Robert Freeman
6 June 2026
World Cup
Global

World Cup history — Streaks and attacking records

by Alaa Shamali
6 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart