More Tory nonsense, this time over period poverty
The Tory’s latest grand pledge about poverty has not washed with many people. Rightly so, as its new measures to tackle period poverty fall way short of the mark. Moreover, it’s really just sticking plasters on broken legs.
Another day, more lip service?
As ITV News reported, next week the Department for Education (DfE) will roll out free sanitary products for schools. The policy’s not new. It was announced by former chancellor Philip Hammond in 2019. But it’s only just got off the ground.
Under the scheme, primary and secondary schools will be able to order sanitary products. The government will fund these. Girls and young women will be able to access these products when they need them.
Children and families minister Michelle Donelan bigged the project up. She told ITV News:
We know that it is not easy for everyone to access period products where and when they need them.
This scheme will deal with those problems so young people can go about their daily lives without getting caught out if they have come on their period unexpectedly, [have] forgotten to bring products with them or if they can’t afford the products they need.
Girls and women not being able to afford sanitary products is a major problem. As the website Global Women Connected noted, in the UK:
Read on...
- “1 in 10 girls aged 14 to 21 can’t afford menstrual products”
- “Half of all schoolgirls miss a full day of school because of their period”
- “The average UK woman will spend more than £18,000 on periods over her lifetime”
Period Power speaks
Linda Allbutt from campaign group Period Power was less than impressed. She told The Canary:
It’s an opt in service so I feel some schools may miss this. There are certain restrictions on quantities allowed set against the numbers of menstruating girls. We deliver whatever is asked and whenever it’s asked.
We feel that this is only addressing a small number of menstruaters. Many many women are isolated each month as they cannot afford the correct sanitary protection. This is absolutely a result of austerity measures and this still needs addressing. We are campaigning now to get products in all workplace toilets. [We’ve] already had some success. Toilet paper and soap are expected so why not sanitary products?
Twitter does its thing
The Tory policy also left much of Twitter unimpressed. Melanie Harvey noted that period poverty isn’t exclusive to schools:
Free sanitary products for girls in school is welcome but long long overdue. Now make them free for ALL females. Periods aren’t a choice. Tampax aren’t a luxury, they’re a human right. End #periodpoverty
— melanie harvey (@melharvey72) January 18, 2020
One user raised a good point about health conditions and illnesses:
For everyone moaning about free sanitary products in schools, please bare in mind all the teens like me who had endometriosis or PCOS having a place to go and get extra spare when you've already gone through the 8 tampons/pads in your bag that day will be a relief #periodpoverty
— Saving up to move to Scotland 🏴 (@SomeRachael) January 18, 2020
Some real talk, right here:
Have you ever had a heavy period and used an own brand cheap sanitary towel? You leak within the hour therefore having to change it more. There's this myth that women only bleed a tiny bit. I used to have to change my pad every hour & that was with decent ones. #periodpoverty
— Cayleigh is ainm dom 💫 🖤 (@cinnamxnwitch) January 18, 2020
And, in response to some people asserting that period poverty isn’t a ‘thing’, Alex summed it up quite well:
Going through the #periodpoverty tag is great. It's lots of people being supporting of the UKs decision to make sanitary products available for free in schools.
Then there's a bunch of boomer types like "They can't afford sanitary products, BuT SoMe KiDs HaVe IphOneS".
Bruh
— Alex – Fold Up Toy Designer (@PaperFolderMan) January 18, 2020
The root of the issue
As Allbutt alluded to, the policy doesn’t really get to the heart of the issue. Because it isn’t addressing why some people are so poor they can’t afford the products in the first place. To do that, the Tories would have to deal with the following:
- 30% of children living in poverty.
- 70% of children in poverty in a household where one person works.
- 8 million people living in working households but in relative poverty.
If men bled…
Tackling the root causes of period poverty is probably too much to ask of the Tories. But never mind. As Matt neatly summed up:
If men bled once a month out of their cocks, #periodpoverty would have been eroded half a century ago. Sanitary products are a basic necessity, that society should provide free for women; period!
— Matt (@MATTxLAW) January 18, 2020
Of course, if you’re a man you can still get free condoms. C21st equality, hey?
Featured image via EU2017EE Estonian Presidency – Wikimedia and Sarah Naqvi – Creative Commons
Get involved
- Follow Period Power on Twitter.
- Join in the conversation using the hashtags #FreePeriods, #PeriodPoverty, and #PeriodPower.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Such an important subject, and yes, any person connected to this Tory Government should feel nothing but shame that they preside over a situation where females in this country are unable to afford sanitary products. The end of this article is however a disgrace. Both women and men have access to free condoms on the basis that contraception is the responsibility of both sexes. There is however no connection between contraceptives and period poverty. Furthermore I am afraid “MATT”, with his emotive language of men bleeding “out of their cocks” has completely missed the point. If men bled every month, then I can assure you tha,t the poorest men in society would be left to their own devices, in the same way as the poorest women are now. Not all men have the power and privilege to change such things. If they did then all men would be wealthy and no men would die in the streets of homelessness and want.
In fact, the majority of rough sleepers are men. I get a bit sick of being told how privileged I am, especially while trying to fill out a DWP form.