More Tory nonsense, this time over period poverty

Boris Johnson and a decorative tampon
Support us and go ad-free

The Tory’s latest grand pledge about poverty has not washed with many people. Rightly so, as its new measures to tackle period poverty fall way short of the mark. Moreover, it’s really just sticking plasters on broken legs.

Another day, more lip service?

As ITV News reported, next week the Department for Education (DfE) will roll out free sanitary products for schools. The policy’s not new. It was announced by former chancellor Philip Hammond in 2019. But it’s only just got off the ground.

Under the scheme, primary and secondary schools will be able to order sanitary products. The government will fund these. Girls and young women will be able to access these products when they need them.

Children and families minister Michelle Donelan bigged the project up. She told ITV News:

We know that it is not easy for everyone to access period products where and when they need them.

This scheme will deal with those problems so young people can go about their daily lives without getting caught out if they have come on their period unexpectedly, [have] forgotten to bring products with them or if they can’t afford the products they need.

Girls and women not being able to afford sanitary products is a major problem. As the website Global Women Connected noted, in the UK:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
  • “1 in 10 girls aged 14 to 21 can’t afford menstrual products”
  • “Half of all schoolgirls miss a full day of school because of their period”
  • “The average UK woman will spend more than £18,000 on periods over her lifetime”
Period Power speaks

Linda Allbutt from campaign group Period Power was less than impressed. She told The Canary:

It’s an opt in service so I feel some schools may miss this. There are certain restrictions on quantities allowed set against the numbers of menstruating girls. We deliver whatever is asked and whenever it’s asked.

We feel that this is only addressing a small number of menstruaters. Many many women are isolated each month as they cannot afford the correct sanitary protection. This is absolutely a result of austerity measures and this still needs addressing. We are campaigning now to get products in all workplace toilets. [We’ve] already had some success. Toilet paper and soap are expected so why not sanitary products?

Twitter does its thing

The Tory policy also left much of Twitter unimpressed. Melanie Harvey noted that period poverty isn’t exclusive to schools:

One user raised a good point about health conditions and illnesses:

Some real talk, right here:

And, in response to some people asserting that period poverty isn’t a ‘thing’, Alex summed it up quite well:

The root of the issue

As Allbutt alluded to, the policy doesn’t really get to the heart of the issue. Because it isn’t addressing why some people are so poor they can’t afford the products in the first place. To do that, the Tories would have to deal with the following:

  • 30% of children living in poverty.
  • 70% of children in poverty in a household where one person works.
  • 8 million people living in working households but in relative poverty.
If men bled…

Tackling the root causes of period poverty is probably too much to ask of the Tories. But never mind. As Matt neatly summed up:

Of course, if you’re a man you can still get free condoms. C21st equality, hey?

Featured image via EU2017EE Estonian Presidency – Wikimedia and Sarah Naqvi – Creative Commons

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

  • Follow Period Power on Twitter.
  • Join in the conversation using the hashtags #FreePeriods, #PeriodPoverty, and #PeriodPower.


We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Such an important subject, and yes, any person connected to this Tory Government should feel nothing but shame that they preside over a situation where females in this country are unable to afford sanitary products. The end of this article is however a disgrace. Both women and men have access to free condoms on the basis that contraception is the responsibility of both sexes. There is however no connection between contraceptives and period poverty. Furthermore I am afraid “MATT”, with his emotive language of men bleeding “out of their cocks” has completely missed the point. If men bled every month, then I can assure you tha,t the poorest men in society would be left to their own devices, in the same way as the poorest women are now. Not all men have the power and privilege to change such things. If they did then all men would be wealthy and no men would die in the streets of homelessness and want.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.