A letter sent by the Conservative homelessness minister to councils has caused outrage. Because it shows that either the Tories are wilfully ignorant to the causes of rough sleeping, or they really don’t care either way.
An appalling record
The Conservative government’s response to the historical and ongoing homelessness crisis during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic has been appalling at best. As The Canary previously reported, in March, the government said it was giving £3.2m to councils to get every rough sleeper off the streets. At first, it appeared to work. But then the Tories ended the fund, lumping support for homeless people and rough sleepers in with other council funding.
to advise councils on plans to support rough sleepers into long-term, safe accommodation once lockdown is lifted – preventing the vulnerable from returning to the streets
Now, the homelessness minister has expanded on that ‘advice’ to councils. But in the process he’s managed to insult every rough sleeper in the country.
Inside Housing revealed that homelessness minister Luke Hall wrote to every council in England last week. It reported that he:
asked that when considering move-on accommodation options, councils should “seek to encourage people, where appropriate and possible, to return to friends and family”.
Inside Housing also noted that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) told it that:
it was asking councils to carry out individual assessments and consider a range of options to ensure people’s needs are met, which could involve returning to friends and family in some cases.
It’s important to note that the MHCLG said that councils need to assess rough sleepers on an “individual” basis. But people were shocked by the Tories’ idea of sending rough sleepers back to their families and friends:
— 🌻❤️Lara Oyedele 👠🏠 (@LaraOyedele) June 3, 2020
Brilliant. What's next?
Solve poverty by getting more money, councils urge.
End drug dependency by no longer taking drugs, councils urge.
— DLKeatis (@DLKeatis) June 3, 2020
But Jamie Jones perhaps made the most important point:
Why do they think a lot of people are homeless in the first place?
— JamieJones77🕷 (@JamieJones77) June 3, 2020
The Tories’ plans miss this crucial point: that many rough sleepers are in that position in the first place due to family problems, domestic abuse and breakdowns of relationships.
For example, charity Centre Point noted that 59% of the young people it sees are homeless because of family breakdowns. But it said that these situations can often:
be the result of individual problems and support needs, interpersonal difficulties, manifestations of childhood trauma or structural factors such as poverty
Meanwhile, Women’s Aid said, of 309 women it supported to escape domestic abuse:
136 (44%) of these women sofa-surfed, 42 (14%) stayed in local authority emergency accommodation, 22 (7%) slept rough and 12 (4%) stayed in a B&B, hostel or hotel.
Even tabling the idea of sending some rough sleepers to family and friends is shocking. But it could also create chaos for the people involved. Councils should rightly ignore the Tories’ advice. It’s an insult to every homeless person and rough sleeper in England.
Featured image via Geograph – Evelyn Simak
We’re a thorn in the side of the establishment, but we can’t do it without your help
Your fight is our fight. But as many of you will know, speaking truth to power has never been easy, especially for a small, independent media outlet such as the Canary. We have weathered many attempts to silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media. Now more than ever, we need your support.
We don’t have fancy offices, and our entire staff works remotely. Almost all of our income is spent on paying the people who make the Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our team and enables us to continue to do what we do: disrupt power, and amplify people.
But we can’t do this without you. So please, if you appreciate our work, can you help us continue the fight?