Defence minister launches propaganda blitz ahead of Commons war crime debate

Soldiers in Afghanistan
Joe Glenton

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has launched a propaganda blitz ahead of a Commons debate on a controversial war crimes bill. Critics say the bill could decriminalise torture, damage human rights, and help authoritarian regimes. 

Due to be debated by MPs on 23 September, the overseas operations bill aims to introduce radical new limitations on prosecution for allegations of abuse by troops during wartime. 

The Tories have been trying to loosen the laws which govern war throughout their time in power, framing the issue of so-called legacy allegations from Iraq and Afghanistan as a patriotic defence of the troops against “left-wing activist lawyers” and ‘devious Iraqis and Afghans’ eager to cash in.

This is despite the military already paying out millions in compensation over abuse allegations, as the army’s one-time top lawyer in Iraq has noted, and the fact that many allegations were reported by serving military personnel and veterans. 

Backlash  

Following an MOD tweet about the bill on 16 September, there was an immediate backlash on social media. Defence minister Johnny Mercer then posted a panicked response on Twitter in which he tried, once again, to frame the bill as being in the interests of military personnel while attacking those who questioned the potential impact as “ludicrous” and framing their arguments as “misleading.” 

Mercer told his followers that he was ready to field questions on the issue.

Critics include the NGO Freedom from Torture, which asked about a section of the bill which includes a presumption against prosecution in some cases.

Mercer is yet to respond as promised. 

Decriminalising torture

The proposals have drawn criticism from a number of individual experts and legal and human rights organisations in recent years.

Freedom from Torture claim that the legislation will “effectively decriminalise torture”

Meanwhile, Reprieve highlighted that the:

legislation which would create a presumption against prosecution for any acts of torture undertaken by UK personnel which took place more than five years ago.

 

And Warwick University law professor Andrew Williams, who has written extensively on the topic, warned that the proposed legislation is an attack on lawyers and the rule of law. 

Far from being a bid to save the troops from legal issue down the line, the Tory war crimes bill looks more and more like an attempt to skirt the rule of law and shore up the UK’s aggressive foreign policy aims.

Featured image via Elite Forces

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. My MP (Fabian Hamilton) pointed out that “A less publicised element of the Bill is that it breaches the Armed Forces Covenant by preventing British Armed Forces personnel from holding the Ministry of Defence to account when it fails to properly equip troops, or when it makes serious errors that lead to death or injury of British forces overseas. This protects the MoD rather than our troops.”

    2. Mercer has weasel worded his offer so as to ensure he does not answer any questions from organisations which have expertise and inside knowledge ie know the right questions to ask. His offer was to answer “any question INDIVIDUALS may have” (my emphasis)

      Either Mercer is a fool and knows nothing of what the bill obviously includes OR he does know and he is happy to cover up torture etc and ensure that those who rightfully have complaints against serving members or the MoD can’t do so. He is ex services so this is somewhat of a betrayal of his former comrades covered up as some kind of blanket immunity for them. He is truly a disgusting individual..

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.