Defence minister launches propaganda blitz ahead of Commons war crime debate
The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has launched a propaganda blitz ahead of a Commons debate on a controversial war crimes bill. Critics say the bill could decriminalise torture, damage human rights, and help authoritarian regimes.
Due to be debated by MPs on 23 September, the overseas operations bill aims to introduce radical new limitations on prosecution for allegations of abuse by troops during wartime.
The Tories have been trying to loosen the laws which govern war throughout their time in power, framing the issue of so-called legacy allegations from Iraq and Afghanistan as a patriotic defence of the troops against “left-wing activist lawyers” and ‘devious Iraqis and Afghans’ eager to cash in.
This is despite the military already paying out millions in compensation over abuse allegations, as the army’s one-time top lawyer in Iraq has noted, and the fact that many allegations were reported by serving military personnel and veterans.
Backlash
Following an MOD tweet about the bill on 16 September, there was an immediate backlash on social media. Defence minister Johnny Mercer then posted a panicked response on Twitter in which he tried, once again, to frame the bill as being in the interests of military personnel while attacking those who questioned the potential impact as “ludicrous” and framing their arguments as “misleading.”
Mercer told his followers that he was ready to field questions on the issue.
Read on...
Thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. Can you explain why sexual violence is exempt from the presumption against prosecution and torture is not?
The torture survivors we work with are very interested in the answer.
— Freedom from Torture (@FreefromTorture) September 16, 2020
Critics include the NGO Freedom from Torture, which asked about a section of the bill which includes a presumption against prosecution in some cases.
Mercer is yet to respond as promised.
Decriminalising torture
The proposals have drawn criticism from a number of individual experts and legal and human rights organisations in recent years.
Freedom from Torture claim that the legislation will “effectively decriminalise torture”
Meanwhile, Reprieve highlighted that the:
legislation which would create a presumption against prosecution for any acts of torture undertaken by UK personnel which took place more than five years ago.
Do you really need more reasons than that the Overseas Operations Bill could decrimialise torture?
We didn't think so. But here's 5 anyway 👇🏽 pic.twitter.com/IMuIPMk6OA
— Reprieve (@Reprieve) September 13, 2020
And Warwick University law professor Andrew Williams, who has written extensively on the topic, warned that the proposed legislation is an attack on lawyers and the rule of law.
Far from being a bid to save the troops from legal issue down the line, the Tory war crimes bill looks more and more like an attempt to skirt the rule of law and shore up the UK’s aggressive foreign policy aims.
Featured image via Elite Forces
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
My MP (Fabian Hamilton) pointed out that “A less publicised element of the Bill is that it breaches the Armed Forces Covenant by preventing British Armed Forces personnel from holding the Ministry of Defence to account when it fails to properly equip troops, or when it makes serious errors that lead to death or injury of British forces overseas. This protects the MoD rather than our troops.”
Mercer has weasel worded his offer so as to ensure he does not answer any questions from organisations which have expertise and inside knowledge ie know the right questions to ask. His offer was to answer “any question INDIVIDUALS may have” (my emphasis)
Either Mercer is a fool and knows nothing of what the bill obviously includes OR he does know and he is happy to cover up torture etc and ensure that those who rightfully have complaints against serving members or the MoD can’t do so. He is ex services so this is somewhat of a betrayal of his former comrades covered up as some kind of blanket immunity for them. He is truly a disgusting individual..