Defence minister launches propaganda blitz ahead of Commons war crime debate

Soldiers in Afghanistan
Support us and go ad-free

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has launched a propaganda blitz ahead of a Commons debate on a controversial war crimes bill. Critics say the bill could decriminalise torture, damage human rights, and help authoritarian regimes. 

Due to be debated by MPs on 23 September, the overseas operations bill aims to introduce radical new limitations on prosecution for allegations of abuse by troops during wartime. 

The Tories have been trying to loosen the laws which govern war throughout their time in power, framing the issue of so-called legacy allegations from Iraq and Afghanistan as a patriotic defence of the troops against “left-wing activist lawyers” and ‘devious Iraqis and Afghans’ eager to cash in.

This is despite the military already paying out millions in compensation over abuse allegations, as the army’s one-time top lawyer in Iraq has noted, and the fact that many allegations were reported by serving military personnel and veterans. 


Following an MOD tweet about the bill on 16 September, there was an immediate backlash on social media. Defence minister Johnny Mercer then posted a panicked response on Twitter in which he tried, once again, to frame the bill as being in the interests of military personnel while attacking those who questioned the potential impact as “ludicrous” and framing their arguments as “misleading.” 

Mercer told his followers that he was ready to field questions on the issue.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Critics include the NGO Freedom from Torture, which asked about a section of the bill which includes a presumption against prosecution in some cases.

Mercer is yet to respond as promised. 

Decriminalising torture

The proposals have drawn criticism from a number of individual experts and legal and human rights organisations in recent years.

Freedom from Torture claim that the legislation will “effectively decriminalise torture”

Meanwhile, Reprieve highlighted that the:

legislation which would create a presumption against prosecution for any acts of torture undertaken by UK personnel which took place more than five years ago.


And Warwick University law professor Andrew Williams, who has written extensively on the topic, warned that the proposed legislation is an attack on lawyers and the rule of law. 

Far from being a bid to save the troops from legal issue down the line, the Tory war crimes bill looks more and more like an attempt to skirt the rule of law and shore up the UK’s aggressive foreign policy aims.

Featured image via Elite Forces

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. My MP (Fabian Hamilton) pointed out that “A less publicised element of the Bill is that it breaches the Armed Forces Covenant by preventing British Armed Forces personnel from holding the Ministry of Defence to account when it fails to properly equip troops, or when it makes serious errors that lead to death or injury of British forces overseas. This protects the MoD rather than our troops.”

    2. Mercer has weasel worded his offer so as to ensure he does not answer any questions from organisations which have expertise and inside knowledge ie know the right questions to ask. His offer was to answer “any question INDIVIDUALS may have” (my emphasis)

      Either Mercer is a fool and knows nothing of what the bill obviously includes OR he does know and he is happy to cover up torture etc and ensure that those who rightfully have complaints against serving members or the MoD can’t do so. He is ex services so this is somewhat of a betrayal of his former comrades covered up as some kind of blanket immunity for them. He is truly a disgusting individual..

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.