The best bits of PMQs were after Starmer stopped speaking

Keir Starmer at PMQs on 14 October
Steve Topple

Given previous weeks, you’d be forgiven for switching off Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) early. But sometimes it’s worth waiting a bit longer. As two of the more interesting points of Wednesday 14 October’s edition actually came from backbench Labour MPs – after Keir Starmer stopped speaking.

Seizing an opportunity

Ignoring Starmer and Boris Johnson’s playground-like spat, other Labour MPs actually made the most interesting points.

First up was Matt Western. He said:

The communities secretary has a habit of hitting the headlines. Not always for the right reasons. At the weekend we discovered that his constituency had been awarded £25m for a regeneration scheme. And that was approved by one of his own ministers. The secretary of state returned the favour by approving funding for that minister’s constituency.

In short, housing, communities and local government secretary Robert Jenrick signed off on money for one of his junior ministers, Jake Perry. It was for his constituency’s housing needs. Then, Perry returned the favour by signing off on £25m for Jenrick’s constituency. One good turn deserves another, hey?

Peak cronyism?

Western put it to the PM:

does he… think that the public might be right in thinking this all looks a bit grubby?

Johnson said these bungs had all been “independently approved”. Which is not really the point. There’s little more grubby than Tory ministers treating their departments like some Masonic Lodge: trading favours and scratching each other’s backs.

Speaking of grubby, the Tories’ habit of stopping MP’s scrutinising what they’re up to also came into the spotlight.

Remote participation

Labour MP Dawn Butler drew attention to the remote participation in House of Commons proceedings bill. It calls for parliament to make changes in light of the pandemic. The bill calls for MPs to be able to vote remotely. It also wants MPs to be able to participate fully and attend parliament and committees remotely.

Sounds perfectly reasonable, doesn’t it? Unless you’re the Tories who have actively tried to stop MPs debating things like the Coronavirus Act. Butler asked the speaker Lindsay Hoyle:

can you please advise me how best we can ensure that [the]… bill become a reality for this house?

Butler was asking this in response to something Hoyle said earlier. In short, Johnson had previously claimed that the issues surrounding virtual MP participation was the job of Hoyle and the House of Commons authorities to sort out. But Hoyle made a pointed take-down of this before PMQs. In short, it is the government’s responsibility. Hence Butler’s question:

And as Butler previously said:

The Government’s action to stifle parliamentary democracy is worrying… We cannot and we must not allow the Prime Minister’s – and his adviser’s – insatiable lust for power to threaten our fundamental British values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

The chances of Butler’s bill becoming law are slim. But at least she’s trying. And her and Western’s interventions today were probably the highlights of PMQs.

Featured image via the Telegraph – YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us