• Donate
  • Login
Friday, June 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Once again UCU leadership has screwed over its members and left them in a weakened position

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
11 September 2023
in Trending, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
172 2
A A
0
Home Trending
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The University and College Union (UCU) has angered some of its members after its higher-ups called off a marking boycott. However, the news also comes as the trade union announced five days of strikes. So, people have been rightly left bemused at best – and furious at worst.

The UCU’s protracted dispute

The Canary has been documenting the protracted dispute between the UCU, workers, and higher education bosses. At first, it was over pay, conditions, and pensions – resulting in nationwide strikes. The union and the organisation responsible for pensions came to an agreement in April. However, members also voted to reject the Universities and Colleges Employers Association (UCEA) pay offer of derisory increases of 5-8%.

So, UCU members began a marking boycott in April, known as ‘action short of a strike’. It had the desired effect of disrupting universities. However, now the union has decreed the boycott will end:

🚨IMPORTANT UPDATE:

Members have voted to end the marking and assessment boycott.

We have immediately served universities with notice of 5 more days of strike action.

More info can be found in your member email and in the thread below.

— UCU (@ucu) September 6, 2023

The UCU announced this at the same time it said there would be five days of strikes:

Staff at 140 universities across the UK will strike for five days later this month in a long-running dispute over pay and working conditions.

At 136 of the 140 universities, UCU members will strike for five consecutive days from Monday 25 to Friday 29 September. Strikes will hit four Scottish universities on slightly different dates to coincide with local action by other unions.

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said:

We are left with no option but to strike during the start of term because our members refuse to stand by while pay is eroded and staff are shunted onto gig-economy contracts.

An ‘utter shambles’

However, some UCU members were unimpressed by its decisions. This is because:

  • The UCU has left its members with no indefinite industrial action.
  • Communications around this were poor.
  • Workers will now have to mark while starting the new academic year.
  • Members will now have to wait for another ballot before any more industrial action can happen – when the UCU could have balloted them over the summer.
  • The marking boycott didn’t actually achieve anything.

Moreover, hardly any members actually voted to end the marking boycott. As the website UCU Left wrote:

The results of the e-ballot over the continuation of the Marking and Assessment Boycott (MAB) will be a surprise to many. Although overall 60% of members voted to end the MAB early (on a 27% turnout), HEC members were told that 62.7% of members who said they were participating in the MAB voted to keep it on!

So, not only did hardly any members actually vote, but the ones who were actually participating in the boycott wanted it to continue.

On X (formerly Twitter), people called out the union over its actions:

https://twitter.com/katemdavo/status/1699445775313338817

So basically my employer docked half my wages for a couple of months and now I'll be expected to do all that marking right as I'm in the middle of prepping content for new lectures. This has been disastrous for staff and our students. UCU leadership need to resign. https://t.co/Hf4jeZnY2S

— Brian Carey (@CareyBrian) September 6, 2023

This seems really bad for UCU lecs. By ending the marking boycott prematurely, UK lecturers will now have to return to work without having achieved concessions. If I understand correctly, they have to mark outstanding work – for which they were not paid – in the next two weeks. https://t.co/pFk6j92eQ1

— katkin (@la_Luchona_) September 6, 2023

There were also quite a few people calling on Grady to resign:

https://twitter.com/squ2023/status/1699465103291076786

Looking forward to @ucu members saying bye-bye to @DrJoGrady as UCU General Secretary soon, after tolerating so much HQ betrayal and incompetence over the past couple of years.#ucuRISING #OneOfUsAllOfUs https://t.co/oRQGzRrK84

— Ioana Cerasella Chis (@CerasellaChis) September 6, 2023

Jo Grady needs to resign. https://t.co/nrr3hrubc6

— Philip Proudfoot (@PhilipProudfoot) September 6, 2023

Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time the UCU has displayed its shambolic decision-making.

What a shitshow

As the Canary previously reported in February:

UCU members were set to walk out again on 21, 22, 23, 27 and 28 February, and 1 and 2 March. However, late on Friday 17 February, the union announced it had “paused” those strikes. UCU general secretary Jo Grady said in a video message that this was due to “significant progress” in talks over pay and pensions with university bosses. She further said the pause in strikes was to:

“enable us to hold intensive negotiations with the aim of delivering a final agreement”

At the time, some members were furious. Their anger ended up being rightly placed. The UCU only really delivered on the pensions side of the dispute, as opposed to the issues with pay and conditions. For example, the union claimed that it had secured a “commitment” from bosses to “end all involuntary zero hours contracts”. What this actually meant was that the UCEA was consulting with its boss-members on this.

Fast forward to June, and universities were still employing workers on zero-hours contracts:

UCEA says they will negotiate (not on pay) if we stop the MAB.
If we do it, we lose every leverage we have UCEA does not give a single **** about ACAS, if that wasn't clear. Remember the commitment to "end zero hours contracts" in Feb? Have you seen this? https://t.co/wYkLFYcqbE

— ShareAnt (@ShareAnt1) June 23, 2023

So, at a time when the UCEA isn’t budging on anything, UCU bosses decide to scale back their members’ actions. It would seem preposterous – if the union hadn’t done this kind of thing before. Now, members are once again left waiting for the UCU to cobble something together that makes it look like a functioning trade union.

Featured image via the National Education Union – YouTube

Tags: educationstrikestrade unionsUCUuniversities
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Former PM Liz Truss has written an entire book about her 15 minutes in office

Next Post

As opposition to the DSEI arms fair intensifies, over 40 Israeli arms companies have set up shop

Next Post
DSEI arms fair police surround a lock on Israeli

As opposition to the DSEI arms fair intensifies, over 40 Israeli arms companies have set up shop

Prime minister Rishi Sunak boards an RAF jet

Closing rail ticket offices is the 'right thing for the British public', says Sunak

Polling station sign

Parliamentary report finds photo voter ID requirement is systemically flawed

Virunga National Park, where the DRC is opening up new oil and gas blocks.

Major insurance companies shun new oil and gas in the biodiverse Congo Basin - it could be a death knell for big oil in the DRC

Laura Kuenssberg State of Chaos

Kuenssberg's 'State of Chaos' was little more than centre-right political porn for the middle classes

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Composite image from individual portraits of the Heathrow Five
News

Heathrow Five lose appeal against convictions for planning protest that never happened

by The Canary
5 June 2026
FIFA World Cup 2022 — Joel Campbell cools off
Analysis

FIFA water ban sparks fan backlash ahead of 2026 World Cup

by Alaa Shamali
5 June 2026
home office
Analysis

Belfast human rights activist could be deported due to Home Office incompetence

by Robert Freeman
5 June 2026
the new internationalist
UK

New Internationalist launches £150k survival appeal

by The Canary
5 June 2026
de-banking
Skwawkbox

Jewish anti-genocide activist Greenstein suffers second ‘de-banking’ attack

by Skwawkbox
5 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart