HS2 legacy left in tatters as the government considers scrapping its northern leg

Tree cut down to build HS2 in Chiltern


Support us and go ad-free

The government is reportedly discussing scrapping phase two of HS2, which would connect Birmingham to Manchester. However, work already started on phase one of the rail line, which connects London to Birmingham. As a result, one of the country’s most expensive public projects will benefit the south and forego the north.

Billions wasted

The Independent revealed on 14 September that prime minister Rishi Sunak and chancellor Jeremy Hunt have discussed scrapping HS2’s second stage. Phase two would connect Birmingham to Manchester. The government has already spent ÂŁ2.3bn on pre-construction work for phase two. However, the Independent reported that this money is now ” not recoverable even if it is cancelled”.

Scrapping further work on HS2 phase two will save up to ÂŁ34bn, the government estimated. However, Royal Assent was given to part one of phase 2a – between Birmingham and Crewe – in February 2021. That will make it “hard to cancel it outright”, according to the Independent.

HS2 is supposedly the largest infrastructure project in Europe. In 2010, the proposed costs for HS2 were between ÂŁ30.9bn and ÂŁ36bn. By 2019, an independent review estimated the project would cost ÂŁ106.4bn. Then, in October 2022, another estimate placed the final cost at more than ÂŁ150bn, accounting for inflation.

Amid ballooning costs, the project has also faced setbacks and changes including scrapping the line to Leeds.

Prising wide the North/South divide

News that the government could scrap phase two led to outrage amongst political figures and the public in the North of England. Andy Burnham, mayor of Greater Manchester, said the news showed the government saw northern passengers as “second-class citizens”, adding:

The result? The southern half of England gets a modern rail system and the North left with Victorian infrastructure. Levelling up? My arse.

Related articles

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Some people on social media echoed the sentiment that it reinforces problems of the traditional North/South divide:

One person even provided an updated HS2 map showing what the line will look like if phase two is scrapped:

Meanwhile, actor Robert Lindsay pointed out how HS2’s money could have been better spent:

Ecological and social destruction

HS2’s waste of public money and reinforcement of social divides has occurred against a backdrop of massive ecological and cultural destruction. A report by the Wildlife Trusts in January 2020 showed the line’s full route would destroy or severely harm:

  • 108 ancient woodlands
  • Five wildlife refuges of international importance
  • 33 Sites of Special Scientific Interest
  • 21 local nature reserves

It would also do the same to hundreds of homes and listed buildings. In one case, an entire community was uprooted in South Yorkshire to facilitate the now-scrapped Leeds line

As a result, some people welcomed the news that the government might scrap phase two of the rail line. Chris Green of Friends of the Earth told ITV News that:

I think this is really, really brilliant news for all of the communities living to the north of the West Midlands… who are blighted every day and every night by the prospect of this particular scheme. We could be spending this money on really, really investing in our current rail network, making it fit for purpose, we could be investing in our bus network.

A government watchdog branded HS2 as “unachievable” in July.

Smash and grab

HS2 represents the worst of both worlds. On the one hand, it is ecologically and socially destructive; on the other, it’s failing to deliver on the meagre transport benefits it originally touted. At an estimated ÂŁ307m per mile of track, there are also huge question marks over the economic benefits it will bring to the country. On the other hand, its economic benefit to private profits isn’t in question.

Once again, the Tories have presided over a project that funnels massive amounts of public money into private hands. This has happened multiple times in the last few months alone, such as with the redundant Bibby Stockholm and cover pay for striking doctors that could have resolved the strikes in the first place. All of this is money that could have gone towards actual problems such as crumbling schools and hospitals.

There is a silver lining though: at least this time animals and the landscape might benefit from the government’s incompetence and malice.

Featured image via djim/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Related articles