Green party leader Zack Polanski delivered his first economic speech to the New Economics Foundation on 19 March. Polanski’s diagnosis of the issues with the UK were privatisation, deregulation and the excesses of the rentier class. His solutions included nationalisation of water, rent controls and wealth taxes.
Zack Polanski — End ‘rip off Britain’
He began by highlighting the ‘extreme economic inequality’ in the UK:
We live in Rip Off Britain. Sky high bills, stagnating wages – extreme inequality. It can’t go on like this. But we have a plan to change it.
He then spoke of how green energy not only addresses the climate crisis, but also delivers cheaper bills and shields the UK from volatile international oil markets:
Spain… has doubled its wind and solar capacities since 2019, taking it from having some of the highest energy bills in Europe to some of the lowest. Other countries have been able to learn the lessons from previous crises and prepare – why is our response so weak when disaster strikes? The answer, put simply, is that we live in rip-off Britain: an economy built to reward the few off the work of the many. A country where people work so hard and try to do the right thing but still struggle to afford the basics, and people find themselves constantly cutting back.
Polanski stopped short of offering a publicly owned Green New Deal in his speech, simply saying that we should speed up the transition to renewables. Currently the market is moving towards renewables, but it isn’t happening fast enough to avert the risk of climate catastrophe. It’s worth noting that the esssential of energy was once in public ownership and would deliver even cheaper running costs.
That said, he did state the problem:
A bonfire sale of our water, our energy, our railways – and so many other fundamental services – meant UK Public Wealth went from the Highest in the G7 to the Lowest… over… two decades.
End Right to Buy
Polanski began with an analysis of Right to Buy, but then concluded that it should be replaced with state landlordism:
Over two million houses have now been sold under right to buy since it was introduced. In the first place, those houses went to people who had worked hard and saved up to own the home they lived in and loved – but now they’re increasingly owned by private landlords, property developers and investment firms who treat those homes – and their tenants – as cash cows.
So we need to end right to buy completely.
Instead, why not replace the social homes that are bought up and make provisions against them being used for private rent?
Billionaire Britain
Polanski continued:
In 1990, when I was going through primary school, and there were 15 billionaires in the UK. By last year, that number had risen to 154. And let’s look at how those people are making their money: today, more than 1 in 4 billionaires draw some or all of their wealth from property and inheritance.
Unearned wealth is a huge issue because it undermines the economy. Inheritance tax should be progressive rather than flat.
Zack Polanski on public investment
The Green leader then spoke of an issue with government planning:
UK fiscal forecasting currently relies on rigid fiscal multiplier assumptions that constrain effective government policy. By assuming that spending multipliers expire after 5 years, the current model is prioritising short-term fiscal targets over the longer-term economic and social gains that targeted government spending could achieve. Right now we can’t plan major infrastructure projects. We can’t invest properly in a healthy, educated population. Right now, we can’t build our future.
To be sure, Polanski’s speech was an inspiring and accurate diagnosis of the issues with Britain.
Featured image via the Canary













Zac has it nailed on. Greens are go..
The old way is not on our side it’s on the side of the already have’s. The insatiable needs of corporations are running the country and we are blindly paying up ever more increasing their profits and our own impoverisation, which will only end with us fighting amongst ourselves for the priviledge of a subsistence paying job whilst warfare not welfare spending escalates
Wake up Britain
The great misfortune of present day life is that we have forgotten the purpose of work. We have become confused by the pseudo-science of economics. Work should lead us to prosperity by following the simple rule of only doing what advances prosperity and avoiding what does not. But politicians and economists have taken their eyes off what we do and become wrongly focused on how it is measured.
Money is a measure of what we do. It has no intrinsic worth of its own but is simply a means of exchange, unit of account, and store of value. Could it be that the system is valuing the things we do that hinder prosperity as equal to those that advance it? If so, would this not devalue the money we are using as the measure? Importantly, could this be a previously-obscured explanation for the increasing cost of living, or for the necessities that sustain us and provide shelter and comfort?
For example, the arms trade is a hugely wasteful use of vast resources, manufacturing harmful products. But the many manufacturers’ balance sheets, and the country’s GDP, state it is profitable. Measured in money, the value of adverse production is calculated to be equal to prosperous production. This is a problem of economics, deeming all production to be wealth creation and of positive value, even when contrary to the common good of all humanity.
The global arms trade is negative value production. It adversely impacts on international currencies, our living standards, the natural world, and, above all, life itself. This hypothesis questions the way economics is taught and practised.
No matter how many times you shill Zack Polanski as “the alternative” I won’t buy it.
He is at the end of the day *still* a zionist, regardless of what lies he espouses to win over voters.
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/greens-leader-polanski-embracing-outsider-status-on-gaza-debate/
And no I’m not voting for the other pro-zionist parties either.
Let me know when a genuine anti-zionist candidate that isn’t steeped directly in israel’s blood turns up.
(And for the record, I opposed Donald Trump for the exact same reason. Look at where we are…)
“To be sure, Polanski’s speech was an inspiring and accurate diagnosis of the issues with Britain. ”
It may not have occurred to The Canary, but Polanski’s great insights, applauded here, are a copy and paste version of what socialists have been pointing out for decades.
If the statement ‘It may not have occurred to The Canary, but Polanski’s great insights, applauded here, are a copy and paste version of what socialists have been pointing out for decades.’ is true, then surely you will be agreeing with Zack Polanski?
There is no higher praise than copying and pasting analysis, surely?
My point being that socialist groups have been making the same points since forever, but they go unreported.
Now nice safe ex-Lib Dem Zack copies and pastes and the like of The Canary react as if he’s a messiah or something.
If for one minute I thought Polanski was anything other than another opportunist there might be cause for celebration. But I dont.