• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 25, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Rachel Reeves’ inheritance tax changes are pitiful. We need a system rethink.

James Wright by James Wright
30 October 2024
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
205 9
A A
1
Home UK News
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Labour Party chancellor Rachel Reeves announced at the Autumn Budget an increase in capital gains tax and has lowered the relief for investors on inheritance tax.

On both measures, the changes are welcome but ultimately pitiful. Indeed, Reeves boasted that:

The UK will still have the lowest capital gains tax rate of any European G7 economy

The lower rate of capital gains tax will increase from 10% to 18% and the rate for higher earners will increase from 20% to 24%. The changes would rebalance the economy away from passive income at a rate of £2.5bn.

But equalising capital gains tax with the income tax charged on working people would rebalance society by £15.2bn, according to Tax Justice UK. Research from Oxford University shows that this measure has the support of 62% of the public.

Additionally, ahead of the budget, Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, and all the Green MPs were among the 30 parliamentarians who demanded a wealth tax of 2% on “extreme wealth” of over £10m. This would be more potent than Reeves’s slight reforms, given 1% of the country holds a staggering 70% of the wealth. Around 75% of the public support such wealth taxes, according to YouGov.

The case for progressive inheritance tax

Another way to address the rampant, impossible to defend, scale of inequality in the UK is through reforming the inheritance tax system. In the budget, the chancellor froze the rate of inheritance tax until 2030 at the flat rate of 40% for estates worth more than £325,000. In this sense, estates are the value of the person’s property, savings, and possessions.

Instead, we could scale down nepotistic family dynasties and scale up first class public services through introducing a progressive tax system for inheritance. For example, there could be another higher rate of 50% for inherited wealth above the threshold of £800,000, 60% on estate value above the threshold of £5m, and 70% for those above £10m.

This would still mean a vast amount of wealth is inherited. But, at present, 60% of people’s wealth is inherited. That doesn’t make work pay.

Many countries have replaced flat inheritance tax systems with a progressive one. South Korea, Germany, France, and Japan all have a progressive, higher rate of inheritance tax at 50% or more.

One to ponder: a Job Guarantee

All of this could help balance the economy towards investment in a training and Job Guarantee package in support of the private and public sector. The optional Job Guarantee could deliver a basic universal standard of living for an attractive level of working hours. Then people could work, train or both for more time on top of that for a higher standard of living.

Obviously, the job a person can do depends on their preferences, capabilities, as well as the teaching skills of their mentors. Any training and Job Guarantee package would have to account for this.

Featured image via Channel 4 News – YouTube

Tags: economicsLabour Party
Share159Tweet99ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

DWP Universal Credit debt deductions is a half-baked half measure

Next Post

The zombie apocalypse FINALLY hit the City of London – and not a moment too soon

Next Post
The zombie apocalypse FINALLY hit the City of London – and not a moment too soon

The zombie apocalypse FINALLY hit the City of London - and not a moment too soon

Barclays Palestine Action Elbit

SUCCESS: Barclays DIVESTS from Elbit thanks to Palestine Action campaign

Cannabis legalisation budget NHS

Labour could have freed up £5 BILLION for the NHS - by legalising cannabis

Mpox London clade 1b

First case of new Mpox strain clade 1b detected in London

international aid budget

Rachel Reeves quietly CUTS the international aid budget MORE than the Tories

Comments 1

  1. David Willetts says:
    2 years ago

    Centralised govt is the problem. I wouldn’t let Rachel Reeves choose what colour socks I might wear, so it’s egregiously absurd to let one person decide the tax policy that affects 65 million in the UK, and others beyond our borders, it’s an insane way of conducting our lives. So many people have ideas about how to do this, the ideas in your article being a case in point, far better ideas than Reeves herself, and that find agreement by a majority. System change is necessary, Westminster needs to go, we need to trust the “mob”, which wants fully funded publicly owned and run healthcare for all (scary), free education for all, social care for all, good infrastructure, progressive taxation, much lower inequality. If decision-making was devolved to communities and regions, with spending powers, instead of just one person, that collective wisdom would be truly transformative. The sham democracy we live in prevents that directly, to favour the wealthy. Change necessitates bringing centralised govt to an end.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Yuan
Opinion

Blunted? Even the Wall Street Journal admits the US’s favourite weapon is rusting

by Nandita Lal
25 June 2026
Sexual harassment
Skwawkbox

Scousers gather Friday against workplace sexual harassment

by Skwawkbox
25 June 2026
Tommy Robinson and Karl Stefanovic
Trending

Tommy Robinson puff piece scoured from web following backlash

by Willem Moore
25 June 2026
Andy Burnham and James Purnell
Analysis

Burnham hands cruel ex-DWP Minister the keys to No. 10

by Rachel Charlton-Dailey
25 June 2026
Image from Palestine protests in London. A large crowd with many Palestinian flags and placards
Analysis

The system wants you to feel despair

by Yanar Alkayat
25 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart