We are through the looking glass. Criticising Tom Watson is now antisemitic.

Tom Watson

It looks like we are through the looking glass. The Guardian‘s coverage is now suggesting that criticising Tom Watson is antisemitic.

Criticising the Labour Right is now racist?

Covering a new report from the Community Security Trust (CST), the Guardian echoed the report’s suggestion that criticising certain celebrities and MPs, including Watson, could be antisemitic. The Guardian writes that the pro-Labour Twitter accounts within the report:

were connected to Twitter networks that have used hashtag campaigns to attack MPs or public figures who have raised concerns about antisemitism and Labour. These include #BoycottRachelRiley, which targeted the Countdown presenter who has spoken out on the issue, and #SackTomWatson, which focuses on the party’s deputy leader.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

For reasons such as these, the Twitter accounts are apparently “behind the Labour party’s antisemitism crisis”, according to the CST.

The latest article is a continuation of a trend in the Guardian‘s coverage of Labour and antisemitism. Academics at the Media Reform Coalition (MRC) previously found the Guardian giving “an entirely unchallenged platform” to those attacking Corbyn on the topic of antisemitism to be a consistent problem. The Guardian‘s reporting on the matter has also seen:

  • The paper refuse to publish a letter from over 200 Jewish women disputing the narrative that Labour is antisemitic.
  • Six Jewish Labour members accuse the Guardian of ‘selectively editing’ antisemitism allegations.
  • The outlet censor cartoons poking fun at Tom Watson from its resident illustrator Steve Bell.

Disciplinary cases relating to antisemitism among Labour members since September 2015, meanwhile, relate to 0.06% of the party’s 540,000-strong membership. Labour says:

This represents a tiny minority, but one antisemite is one too many, and we will continue to act against this repugnant form of racism.

Members question Watson’s agenda

Watson constantly attacks the Labour leadership over issues including antisemitism in a way that makes many Labour members question his motives. Darren Williams, a member of Labour’s ruling body, said in July:

What is particularly frustrating, I think, is the way that certain key figures in the party – including obviously Tom Watson – have undermined, in my view, the way the party has tried to deal with the issue in a serious and consistent fashion.

He is not the only person to speak frankly on the matter. When Watson was hosting his LBC show in March, a Labour supporter phoned in to give his views:

You are, right now, sitting… on a revolution that could transform this country for the better. And people like yourself all you do is spend your time killing the Labour party from within. How dare you?

Referring to academic reports is now racist?

The CST is a charity which aims to protect British Jews. Its report, titled Engine of Hate: the online networks behind Labour’s antisemitism crisis, blames an array of pro-Labour Twitter accounts for what it called “antisemitic narratives”. These seem to include:

  • Criticising MPs and public figures through Twitter hashtags such as “#BoycottRachelRiley, #SackTomWatson and #ResignTomWatson”.
  • Referring to corporate media coverage of Labour and antisemitism as a “smear campaign”.

That’s despite the MRC concluding that corporate media coverage of Labour and antisemitism has been a “disinformation paradigm”. The academics at Birkbeck university wrote:

Following extensive case study research, we identified myriad inaccuracies and distortions in online and television news including marked skews in sourcing, omission of essential context or right of reply, misquotation, and false assertions made either by journalists themselves or sources whose contentious claims were neither challenged nor countered.

The report found that the Guardian, BBC TV, the Daily Mail, and the Sun had the “least balanced sourcing” and “highest proportion of reporting failures”.

Yet, according to the Guardian and CST, referring to such academic reports seems to count as fuelling antisemitism; as does criticising deputy leader Watson. This type of nonsense only obscures the struggle against racism.

The Guardian declined The Canary‘s offer to comment and the CST did not respond.

Featured image via YouTube – Sky News / YouTube – Guardian News

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Ironically, people seeking to remedy dire circumstances consequent on three decades of unbridled avarice are being attacked by weapons they crafted themselves. Their ruthless enemy has identified a particular weakness of the ‘wishy washy’ naive element of the ‘left’ and exploited it well.

      We have been regaled for years by earnest persons with admonitions concerning ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, and scores of other purportedly illiberal utterances and behaviour critical of especially cherished minorities; oddly these don’t include children and adults endowed with rare talent in danger of being swamped by mediocrity.

      Fear, sometimes exacerbated by menace, has been instilled in folk who might otherwise voice criticism of minorities in walled gardens who now are (insultingly) deemed too sensitive to respond robustly to vicissitudes of life. In the USA the term ‘snowflake’ has been coined for the class of pathetic individual unable to progress beyond group-think of ignorant peers.

      Accusation of ‘racism’, a widely misunderstood statistical solecism, has for some years been wielded to silence reasonable comment. Those thus accused allow themselves to be pushed into a corner from which they must defend themselves against calumny rather than pursue their original point and establish that it is legitimate. From this, and from a plethora of other issues regarded by guardians of rectitude as off limits, has arisen a culture of apology for offence towards those for whom taking offence has developed into a fine art.

      Antisemitism, the genuine variety promoting hatred and harm, is particularly directed manifestation of crude racism. The latter is a flexible concept deployed nowadays to encompass not only indisputably ignorant and vicious sentiments but also remarks within compass of humour e.g. calling the French ‘frogs’, Germans krauts, and Saudi Arabians rag heads. Only the brave may nowadays quote Kipling’s choicer words about ‘lesser breeds”.

      Cleverly, people seeking to destroy credibility of the reincarnated Labour party, have latched onto sensitivities now inherent to those, in a manner of speaking, born into socialism but fortunately absent among partial converts, such as I, perceiving deep economic and social malaise affecting the population at large.

      Traditionally, ‘properly thinking’ socialists within Labour, plus Blairites pretending to be thus, fear being branded as intolerant bigots by those to whom the adjectives properly fit.

      Hence, the Labour party is particularly over sensitive to accusation of antisemitism arising from dissidents within it and from external malign forces determined upon smashing it by any means. Labour is in need of less empty ideology and more pragmatism.

    2. Some weeks ago I made a flippant comment somewhere saying that as I despise the Zionist Tony Blair, and criticism of Zionism is conflated with anti-Semitism, that it must be anti-Semitic to despite Tony Blair. But hell, they actually went there, albeit with TWatson! This stuff now parody’s itself, it’s that nonsensical.

    3. Look on this as positive feedback. Anything that is working in squashing the smear campaign will be attacked. Deselection of Blairite MPs gets a response? Good, they’re obviously panicking. Claims that criticising Watson is anti semitic? Good, they’re scared he’s going to booted from the deputies job. The biggie though is mentioning “The Lobby” documentary. This one must be really causing an itch as it’s near impossible to argue back against, unlike Panorama’s hatchet job on Labour.

      So, the louder their ridiculous claim becomes, the louder we need to point out how ridiculous that claim is.


      1. Vlad, I love your name by the way. You are right of course. What is a stark actual fact is that these campaigns by the BoD, CST and whoever in the Labour Friends of Israel are intensified now at a time when the Equalities Commission is allegedly undertaking a ‘thoroughly impartial’ investigation into complaints they received. Unfortunately, the head of the Commission and its Deputy are both Jewish, something applauded by the BoD. But you are right, it seems this is all they have got left to throw at Corbyn and quite frankly, I don’t think the British people give a damn about these allegations; there are more important things to worry about such as the gross mismanagement of the economy by two Successive Tory Governments.

        I do think though, Corbyn now needs to make a definitive statement saying enough is enough. Norman Finklestein’s statement is brilliant and included the thought that the Labour Party, in trying to deal with these (I am going to call them totally fabricated allegations about anti-Semitism because they are) are just putting mostly innocent people through a thorough investigative process.

        As the claims are so seriously ridiculous I don’t think we need to shout loudly, they the BoD, the CST, The Jewish Chronicle et al are largely condemning themselves from their own mouths. Personally, I think all these Friends of Israel in Parliament – the whole thing should be scrapped. MPs are there to represent our, the citizens of the UK s interests.

    4. How ironic this is when you consider that the right of the party including Campbell and Ellman had no issue with Campbell’s clearly antisemitic election campaign against Michael Howard – as pointed out by the 2018 issue of Nye Bevan News.co.uk


      Alastair Campbell’s New Labour campaign against the Welsh Jew Micheal Howard proves he’s in no position to point the finger on antisemitism.”

    5. The antisemitism issue is clearly being used as a weapon to attack opponents both within Labour and those in other political groups who have latched on to this well developed program to further their own ends. Defending Jews and the Jewish faith is often not the prime motivation of the attackers and leaves the attackees fighting the shadow monsters.

      In this issue: Watch Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein take down the smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn is excellent. Also the infiltration by the israeli government can be seen: https://www.redressonline.com/2017/01/watch-israels-penetration-of-the-uks-political-system-exposed/

      Labour is guilty of allowing internal problems and power struggles interfere with the important issues if the day which is to unite and defeat the Tories and keep the UK in the EU.

    6. Tom Watson doesn’t know the difference between antisemitism, and speaking up for civil rights in Isreal.
      Who he working for then?? Or being used by? I can’t imagine anyone of his social position having such a low intelligence not to discern the difference. Trump uses the smear campaign to get what he wants so why not Tom Watson?
      The Soviets used the smear campaign against writers or any one who didin’t agree with their indocrination when they invaded the Czech Republic in 1968. A smear campaign to used to oppress.
      This is what is happening to quell the Labour Vision for the right to enact a different, and decent world.
      The trouble with Tom!

      1. Tom Watson is morally and intellectually unfit to be Deputy of the Labour Party let alone be an MP. His sole intention appears to be to do his chosen Government’s bidding (I.e that being the Israeli Government) and that is to bring down Jeremy Corbyn. No more no less. I haven’t heard him in any interviews promote the brilliant Labour Party Manifesto, support Labour Policy or defend Jeremy Corbyn. I am sincerely hoping George Galloway is true to his word and stands as a Labour Supporting MP in order to oust Watson.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.