Explosive exposé reveals ‘unacceptable’ web between the Tory party, billionaire brothers, and our NHS

Boris Johnson
Support us and go ad-free

This article was updated on 9 February 2021 to include a response from Health Assured Limited regarding the extent to which users with gambling issues accessed their service.

The Guardian published an explosive exposé on 16 January, revealing an ugly web that links the Conservative Party, two billionaire brothers, and our NHS.

Addiction is a lucrative business

Brothers Fred and Peter Done own the bookmaker Betfred. The last Sunday Times rich list put the joint value of their investments at over £1.25bn. But the brothers haven’t made all of that from their bookmaking or – more precisely – people’s gambling habits. Because they also control Peninsula Business Services. This company provides support to businesses on issues such as employment law and wellbeing at work.

Health Assured is one part of Peninsula’s offerings. It provides an Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) to businesses for their employees. Health Assured’s EAP includes counselling, advice, and assessments for employees whose bosses sign them up for it.

As the Guardian reports, though, among Health Assured’s offering to employees is:

counselling for issues such as “reckless behaviour”, including excessive drinking or gambling.

Over the last three years, the Done brothers have pocketed dividends of £5.2m from the company. So their fortune comes from both a gambling company and a business that counsels people who develop gambling problems.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

A spokesperson for Health Assured said that “calls relating to gambling amounted to less than 0.1% of all calls received throughout 2019.” However, the total income from this work remains unclear.

It’s a small world

Health Assured also has “dozens” of government contracts, according to the Guardian. For example, it provides its services to “multiple NHS trusts”. Of course, NHS staff treat gambling addicts. As mental health chief of the NHS Claire Murdoch noted when she wrote to the gambling firms this week:

As the head of England’s mental health services and a nurse of more than 30 years’ experience, I have seen first-hand the devastating impact on mental wellbeing of addiction and am concerned that the prevalence of gambling in our society is causing harm.

So even if NHS workers aren’t raising any personal gambling issues with Health Assured during counselling, the fact remains that the NHS itself is trying to help fix a problem created in no small part by the “tactics” of the gambling industry. And the government is splurging taxpayers’ cash on a business whose owners are a major player in that industry.

It gets worse. Since 2016, the brothers have themselves splurged £375,000 on the Conservative Party in donations. They made these donations through their holding company Rainy City Investments.

Due diligence

Health Assured and the government have responded to the Guardian‘s revelations. The former said:

Due to the sensitive nature of the employee counselling service that Health Assured offer, we are unable to provide confidential details concerning clients.

All public sector contracts we have been awarded have thorough due diligence carried out before are they issued, including looking for conflicts of interest.

A government spokesperson commented:

All public sector contracts have due diligence carried out before frameworks are issued, and even when a company is on a framework it does not mean they will receive a contract.

But shadow health secretary Jon Ashworth isn’t buying it. He responded:

Addiction, whether from gambling, drinks or drugs, is a growing mental and public health emergency in society.

Of course all NHS staff should have access to mental and wellbeing support but this looks like an unacceptable conflict of interest. Corporate gambling interests should be nowhere near our health services like this.

Winners, losers and suckers

As is clear, the Done brothers are winning big in this scenario. Not only do they financially benefit from people gambling, but they are also majority-owners of a business that offers counselling for people who become addicted to it. The Conservative Party isn’t doing too badly either, with the hefty donations the pair are sending its way.

The losers in the scenario, of course, are those struggling with gambling addiction. And, frankly, we’re all suckers if we accept that what the Guardian has revealed is acceptable in our society.

Featured image via Guardian News/YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
        1. People who suffer “self-imposed injury” through economic circumstance, ignorance, or sheer stupidity, are unworthy of assistance for recovering from their plight? That is consistent with the ‘may the Devil take the hindmost’ ethic of neo-liberalism. Put differently, it represents the barren outlook encapsulated by ‘I am all right Jack, so push off’. It is stuff of the dystopia promulgated by Ayn Rand.

          Better to help people not get into harm’s way in the first place. That may necessitate restricting ‘enterprise’ geared to taking money off suckers.

          1. People don’t take up gambling through “economic circumstance”: if they don’t have enough money to live on, they don’t have any to gamble with! As for “ignorance, or sheer stupidity”: people are responsible for their own actions and should suffer the consequences. As for “‘I am all right Jack…”, perhaps that is because I choose not to gamble or take drugs. A choice, like the rest of life is, and the idea that society is responsible for the ignorant, or sheer stupid actions of individuals is ridiculous!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.