There’s more than a whiff of corruption hinted at in the ISC report on Russia. It stinks.

ten pound notes hanging on a washing line
Support us and go ad-free

The Russia report published by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of Parliament briefly mentions money laundering by Russians and donations made by oligarchs to unnamed persons in the UK. It also refers to failure by government to investigate possible threats to UK democracy by Russia. However, what the ISC report fails to do is make the connection between those donations and how certain politicians have actively turned a blind eye to the alleged Russian threats.

In any other country this would be regarded as corruption.

Government “actively” ignored threat

In the preface to the press release that accompanied the report, the ISC states:

[The] Intelligence and Security Committee questions whether government took its eye off the ball on Russia, finds that they underestimated the response required to the Russian threat and are still playing catch up

ISC member Stewart Hosie MP (SNP) was damning of government failure to investigate possible threats to UK democracy by Russia:

The UK government have actively avoided looking for evidence that Russia interfered. We were told that they hadn’t seen any evidence, but that is meaningless if they hadn’t looked for it.

The ISC committee added:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The written evidence provided to us appeared to suggest that HMG [the government] had not seen or sought evidence of successful interference in UK democratic processes or any activity that has had a material impact on an election, for example influencing results

EU referendum threats

The committee refers to “credible open source commentary” by Russia to influence the 2014 Scottish referendum on independence. But it adds that, had:

the relevant parts of the intelligence community conducted a similar threat assessment prior to the [EU} referendum, it is inconceivable that they would not have reached the same conclusion as to Russian intent, which might then have led them to take action to protect the process.

As to cyber interference in the EU referendum, the ISC committee claims:

Open source studies have pointed to the…the use of ‘bots’ and ‘trolls’ as evidence of Russian attempts to influence the process.

Though no details were provided, plentiful evidence is provided by a number of sources, as reported by The Canary.

The London “laundromat”

The committee also refers to Russian business money ending up in the pockets of (unnamed) members of the House of Lords:

It is notable that a number of members of the House of Lords have business interests linked to Russia, or work directly for major Russian companies linked to the Russian state

The BBC’s Frank Gardner observed that the report claims illicit Russian money was welcomed with open arms.

His tweet produced some interesting comments, including allegations of corruption:

Money, money, money

The ISC committee did get a little more specific about donations when it stated:

Several members of the Russian elite who are closely linked to Putin are identified as being involved with charitable and / or political organisations in the UK, having donated to political parties, with a public profile which positions them to assist Russian influence operations.


But it failed to name, let alone mention, the money paid by Russian or Putin-linked oligarchs to the Conservative Party. Or the friendship of certain oligarchs with the current prime minister. Or that the Russian ambassador hosted the launch of the Conservative Friends of Russia (later renamed the Westminster Russia Forum). Sergey Nalobin, who arranged the launch and whose father worked as a KGB general, was subsequently ‘expelled‘ as a spy from the UK.

Late last year, The Canary conducted a search of the UK Electoral Commission database, specifically on donations by just four Russia-linked oligarchs, and found that the:

total donations came to a whopping £2,578,909.38 (or £2,768.909.38 if including what appear to be additional payments by Lubov Chernukhin). Nearly all the donations went to the Conservative Party or individual Tory MPs.

But these payments were no aberration: openDemocracy claims that since 2010 the Tories received at least £3.5m from Russian ‘ex-pats’.


Add all this up and there is only one conclusion that can be reasonably made. Namely, that the Conservative government has over the years courted Russians and received substantial donations, possibly from laundered money. In return, Conservative politicians turned a blind eye to likely interference in UK politics, including the EU referendum, by Russian or Russia-linked sources.

There is more than a whiff of corruption. Much more.

Featured image via Flickr – Images Money

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Knock Knock.
      Who’s There?
      McCarthy Who?
      Do You Know Any Russians?

      Seriously. Billionaires (from any country), tend to like the low tax, low regulation, ‘feed the Rich’ parties. I hope you were sitting down for that revelation.
      Thatcherite Tories would sell off the Queen Herself if they could pocket some cash later for it. All of them are globalists for the Corporates, oligarchs, and whichever foreign countries fund their ambitions. I’m sure that was another great shock. 😉
      MANY country’s wealthy have their hooks into the UK political class – and very few billionaires actually care 2p for the living conditions of the British People(s). Something they have in common with the abovementioned politicians.

      What would you find if you went looking for Gulf money? Or Israeli? Or American?

      Do you think you would find that those pockets have bought the BEST politicians, the most moral, decent and honourable? Do you think the policies that have been promoted in this way are for the benefit of the poorest in the UK?

      Right, now you are thinking objectively.

      Stop just looking for ways to ‘tar’ objectionable Tories with links to “Russia”.

      There is NOTHING special about Russian billionaires. Except for the psy-op “Russiagate”. Don’t play into this.

      Look equally into ALL the dirty money flowing in. (I promise you this, when the Establishment read these words to you, they will feel far more threatened now then when you just focus upon “enemy” Russia. Do you think Wahhabi money from the Al Sauds is going to improve UK social welfare policies?).

      I look forward to reading your bigger scoops, Tom. Ponder this – you’d never get a story like that into the corporate media!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.