Secret wars and grey zones: defence minister explains UK’s military future

A soldier in camouflage holding a rifle
Support us and go ad-free

Defence secretary Ben Wallace has been touring the US to explain Britain’s military plans. He hinted that UK troops will fight secret wars and engage in new types of warfare. He also said the UK military was ready to deal with the effects of climate change, population growth, and migration. This will be the future of UK military strategy.

Wallace told his audience he hadn’t to been the US for 18 months. But he made it clear that the UK is still eager to be close to American power.

His keynote speech was at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) in Washington, a top neo-conservative thinktank. The ExxonMobil-backed thinktank has links to climate change denial and 2003 Iraq War figures like Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush, and Dick Cheney.

He told those gathered he agreed with another former AEI member, US president Gerald Ford, that only strength could deliver peace:

President Ford saw his fair share of turbulence too and his approach was to always return to first principles of shared values. Setting out his National Security policy forty-five years ago, he summed it up in three words: “peace through strength”.

He said that this meant military strength, but also cooperation.


Ranger battalions, newly formed from old regiments, will be a key part of UK military policy going forward, Wallace said.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

On land the Army will be more mobile, protected and lethal, with a new Ranger Regiment, able to train, advise and – when needed – to operate alongside our partners in complex, high-threat environments. Their formation was influenced, in part, by your famous Green Berets and I’ll be visiting them in Fort Bragg tomorrow to see what more we can learn.

The new ranger units will also likely be protected from Freedom of Information requests like other special forces units. As The Canary has argued, this could present a new danger to democracy.

East Africa

Speaking at Fort Bragg, Wallace said that the new regiments would likely deploy to East Africa first. He said that the security in Kenya and Somalia was a major concern.

The Telegraph reported:

Warning of the danger from the Islamist al-Shabaab group, Ben Wallace said: “We have to help Somalia [and] we have to help Kenya be resistant.”

Recent history of intervention ahead of a crisis showed “an awful lot of ‘going in at the last minute’”, he said.

Deploying special operations forces to global trouble spots before state failure would “help avoid catastrophic failure” in the future.

The prospect of yet more secret operations in unstable regions of the world carries the danger of more Iraq and Afghanistan-type situations.

Work with the Taliban?

Earlier in his trip, Wallace told reporters that Whitehall would consider working with the Taliban in future. The UK and US have just pulled out of Afghanistan after 20 years. The Taliban already control large swathes of the country.

Whatever the government of the day is, provided it adheres to certain international norms, the UK government will engage with it

He added:

Just like other governments around the world, if they behave in a way that is seriously against human rights, we will review that relationship.

This is a major shift from the position of the last two decades. The UK spent that time fighting a vicious insurgency alongside the US. Many will take this change as a sign of resignation or defeat.

New threats

Wallace used his speech to hype non-traditional threats:

as well as all the wider pressures on governments, like climate change, global health, population growth, urbanisation and migration – all with their associated human security implications, the threats pile up.

The UK defence approach to climate change was spelt out in March 2021 by another defence minister: James Heappey. Heappey said:

Above all, it means influencing the mindset of all the ranks of our military and all the members of our Whole Force to regard protection of the environment and protection of the UK as one and the same thing.

The UK’s response seems set to be militarised. Climate change and national defence will be one and the same. And Heappey predicted resource conflicts with rivals like China.

Grey zone

The ‘grey zone’ or ‘sub-threshold’ wars were another topic. The terms refers to warfare below the threshold of open conflicts – a more secretive and less accountable form of war.

‘Modern deterrence’ has to get smarter and become as much about competing below the threshold of open conflict as above it. I am pleased to say that this is precisely the direction of our doctrinal development.


Wallace has spoken a lot about values in his tour. And while the kind of warfare the UK engages in will change, one of those values remains a commitment to clinging to US power.

Nowhere is this better demonstrated than with a keynote speech delivered at a neo-con thinktank linked to climate change denial and the people who helped destroy Iraq and plunge Afghanistan into even more chaos.

Featured image via Elite Forces UK/PO(Phot) Wheelie A’Barrow

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. We will not only be ‘working with’ the Taliban, we will be financing, supporting and facilitating the Taliban to destablise the countries to the North – Tajikistan (where the UK has been working with ‘terrorists’ for a decade or more), Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. The purpose – to pressure Xinjiang further and to undermine the Belt and Road iniative. Biden’s recent visit to Putin will have been ‘you’re either on our side or against us’. Expect a Syrian-sized conflict. China and Russia supporting the governments and the West supporting the terrorists.

      So we are still sticking with America. Today, China is the richest and most powerful country in the world. In 15 years time, it could have an economy twice that of the USA if it continues with the same trajectory.

      Something tells me we might just be on the losing side, yet again.

    2. Well, the Butcher of Britain & the Tory Party of Death are in control & they’ll do whatever they think will puff them up……the populace will be ignored & told to pay up as usual………….the folks who voted for them are to blame for inflicting them on UKania,

    3. “Just like other governments around the world, if they behave in a way that is seriously against human rights, we will review that relationship.”

      ‘Review’ it, and then continue it just the same as before, no doubt.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.