Civil liberties group warns rise in Taser use due to ‘social control rather than personal protection’

Support us and go ad-free

The use of Taser stun guns by police forces in England and Wales reached a record high last year, new figures show.

The weapons were fired on 2,500 occasions between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019, which is thought to be the highest number recorded.

Tasers – which deliver a high-voltage electric shock – were deployed in 23,000 incidents in the 12 months to the end of March, according to the Home Office. But police monitoring group Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) warned that it suspects tasers are used  “unlawfully, as a tool of social control rather than a last resort for personal protection”.

In most cases, the devices were aimed at a suspect without being fired.

The deployment figure is up by more than a third on the year to March 2018 and double the 2016 total.

The Home Office is providing funding to allow an extra 10,000 police officers to carry Tasers.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The weapons were first trialled in UK police forces in 2003, and a roll-out to all forces was completed in 2013.

Kevin Blowe, the coordinator of Netpol, told The Canary:

The escalation of Taser use is an inevitable consequence of giving these weapons to more and more officers, rather than simply because of any direct link to increasing violent crime. It is significant that they are often used to demonstrate officers’ capacity to use force. We suspect Tasers are drawn in many instances, unlawfully, as a tool of social control rather than a last resort for personal protection.

Police unions have largely succeeded in lobbying for every officer to have a Taser and this is matched by an increase in the routine deployment of armed officers on Britain’s streets. Regrettably, this is another small step closer to all officers carrying a firearm.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The headline “Civil liberties group warns rise in Taser use due to ‘social control rather than personal protection’” is specifically misleading. What the article says is that this is simply a suspicion, for which they present no evidence whatsoever.
      Furthermore, the description of “Netpol” as a “Civil liberties group” is also misleading, as they are in fact a campaigning group, set up to challenge policing strategies, like carrying a means of self-protection such as tasers or guns. They appear to care more for the civil liberties of youths carrying knives or terrorists carrying guns, knives or bombs, than they do for the welfare of those brave Police Officers who have to deal with them, and who regularly place themselves in harms way on our behalf.
      Maybe they favour the Corbyn approach of trying to arrest suicide terrorists, rather than shoot them dead before they can kill any more of us. I would like to see the Netpol crew look death in the face on London Bridge or Borough Market.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.