Child commissioner says vulnerable children are at ‘heightened risk’ during lockdown

The Canary

Vulnerable children are being hidden from sight during the coronavirus (Covid-19) lockdown, the children’s commissioner Anne Longfield has warned. She says this means measures implemented to curb the spread of coronavirus mean youngsters have been cut off from sources of support, such as teachers and health visitors.

Data published for England on 25 April aims to show the true number of children at risk in every local authority during the coronavirus emergency. Local area profiles will also highlight vulnerable groups – such as those in overcrowded or inadequate accommodation, young carers, or those without internet access.

Small numbers

Longfield welcomed the decision to keep schools open for the most vulnerable, but said more needs to be done to safeguard youngsters who aren’t attending.

It comes after official figures showed only a small percentage of vulnerable children in England are attending schools which have been kept open for them. Data published by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC) is being used to inform a government dashboard monitoring the safety and care of children and young people during the crisis.

Although most of the figures have been published nationally, it’s the first time vulnerability amongst children has been broken down by local authority.

“The coronavirus emergency has put hundreds of thousands of vulnerable children in England at heightened risk”, Longfield said. She added:

While the Government’s decision to keep schools open for the most vulnerable children is welcome, sadly most of them are just not showing up.

They are most likely at home, often exposed to a cocktail of secondary risks – a lack of food in the house, sofa-surfing or cramped living conditions, neglect, or experiencing acute difficulties due to parental domestic violence, substance abuse and mental health problems.

Real-time data

Longfield is asking for real-time data from police, the NHS, and government departments to be provided to local services, so they know which families may not be coping and may need help. Analysis by the OCC identifies a number of vulnerabilities, such as children at risk of homelessness, those with parents with mental ill-health and young people involved in criminal exploitation.

For those who are known to social services, the OCC says there is a risk that many more could become “invisible” by being assessed as lower risk by social workers and so deemed not in need of home visits.

Longfield said:

Our figures on local need lay bare the extent and nature of child vulnerability in each area, and the extraordinary pressures on some councils to try and protect them all.

I believe that with the right will, government – local and national – could ensure that all vulnerable children are seen and contact is maintained, harnessing if necessary the efforts of suitable volunteers, those from services which are currently closed or who are recently retired from child-facing work.

It is essential that children who need help are identified and given the help they need.

Sleepless nights

The National Education Union welcomed the OCC data and said local authority coordination is “really important” – but argued that children are not “hidden” from schools.

Joint general secretary Kevin Courtney said: “Schools know their students really well and care deeply about children who face challenges”. He added:

The Covid-19 crisis weighs heavily on teachers’ minds, causing sleepless nights, anxiety and ongoing worry – they know going to school is such a vital part of life for children in usual times.

Courtney added that expecting all vulnerable children to attend on-site “isn’t realistic or necessarily the safest option”, as some are not attending due to a lack of transport, self-isolating, or shielding family members.

Councillor Judith Blake, chair of the Local Government Association’s Children and Young People Board, said:

Understandably, many families are concerned for the health of their children and other family members if they attend school.

Councils are working with schools and families to provide reassurance, and to make sure that where children aren’t in school, they are still being spoken with regularly.

Schools, colleges, and nurseries across the UK closed their doors to the majority of pupils, apart from the children of key workers and vulnerable youngsters, from Monday 23 March.

Data from the Department for Education (DfE) revealed that of the children in school on 17 April, 24,000 were classed as vulnerable – down from 61,000 on 23 March.

This represents around 5% of all children with a social worker or an education, health and care plan in England, according to the government’s analysis.

Government response

In response to the OCC analysis, a DfE spokeswoman said:

Schools and early years settings remain open for vulnerable children, who are encouraged to attend where it is appropriate for them to do so.

We thank social workers and everyone involved in keeping these children safe at this time for their hard work, including continuing to conduct risk assessments and home visits where needed.

Local authorities are receiving additional funding of £3.2 billion to cope with pressures, including in children’s social care and we have set up new teams working around the country to improve the information we hold about the risks facing these children.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us