Met refers itself to police watchdog over sprinter search

Support us and go ad-free

The Metropolitan Police has voluntarily referred itself to the police watchdog following a stop and search involving athlete Bianca Williams.

A video of the incident, which saw the Team GB sprinter and her partner Ricardo dos Santos pulled from their car in a London street, was posted online.

Williams has said she believes officers racially profiled her and dos Santos – a Portuguese 400-metre runner – when they were handcuffed and separated from their three-month-old son.

In a statement issued on Tuesday evening the Met said that following a vehicle stop on Lanhill Road in west London on Saturday it had made “a voluntary referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct”.

The force added: “We have now recorded this incident as a public complaint.

“The decision to refer to the IOPC has been taken due to the complaint being recorded and the significant public interest in this matter and we welcome independent scrutiny of the facts.

“Two reviews of the circumstances by the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards have not identified misconduct for any officer involved.”

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The referral follows comments from 68-year-old Pretenders singer Chrissie Hynde, who accused the Met Police of being “out of touch” and described the incident as “disturbing and shocking”.

The Met previously said on Monday that its Directorate of Professional Standards had revisited body-worn camera footage and social media videos of Saturday’s incident and found no misconduct issues.

Bianca Williams
Bianca Williams (Aaron Chown/PA)

But Hynde, who lives in Maida Vale, west London, where Williams and her partner were stopped, said the incident “illustrates how out of touch the police in London have become”.

In a letter published by the Guardian, she wrote: “The incident was disturbing and aggressive, and the police van remained parked there for over an hour.

“The couple were innocent of whatever charges they were suspected of and were eventually let go.

“There has been a surge of violence in this area over the past five years. The son of a friend of mine was stabbed eight times last year in broad daylight on the same street as Saturday’s incident.

“Nobody will press charges against local gangs for fear of the inevitable payback.

“I watched gang members smash the windows and rob the shop downstairs from me recently and could not get the police on the phone – I was held in a queue long after the smash-and-grabbers had left.

“For years there has been no protection at all on the streets and now hordes of police are pulling over innocent citizens and causing real distress for no reason.

“Can the police get their house in order and start patrolling the gangs, and leave parents to do their shopping?”

Footage of the search was shared widely on Twitter after being posted by former Olympic medallist Linford Christie, who asked why the vehicle had been stopped.

Shadow justice secretary David Lammy described the video as “shocking footage that anyone in their right mind would be alarmed about”.

Nothing was found in the search, which the Met said was carried out by officers patrolling the area in response to an increase in violence involving weapons.

The force also said the vehicle was seen driving suspiciously, including on the wrong side of the road, and that the driver sped off when asked to stop.

But this account was rejected by Williams, who has said she is considering legal action against the Met.

“I feel very hurt by their actions, and to witness my partner being taken away and for me to be taken away from my son, my heart hurts,” she said.

In a statement on Monday, Met Commander for Central West Helen Harper said that while no misconduct issues had been found, “that does not mean there isn’t something to be learnt from every interaction we have with the public”.

She added: “Myself and Chief Superintendent Karen Findlay, who is in charge of the Territorial Support Group, are really keen to speak personally to the occupants of the vehicle to discuss what happened and the concerns they have.”

David Lammy
David Lammy (Joe Giddens/PA)

Lammy, the Labour MP for Tottenham, told the PA news agency such incidents are “diminishing trust among black populations in the criminal justice system”.

Speaking on Tuesday at the launch of a new public art display celebrating the work of artist Khadija Saye, who died in the Grenfell Tower fire, he said: “I’m afraid there has been far too much footage now of what feels like incredibly heavy-handed policing of black people, not just in London but across the country, and this is a moment I think to pause and ask ourselves deep questions that are coming up in relation to Black Lives Matter.

“Why is it that this is persistently happening? It’s diminishing trust among black populations in the criminal justice system.

“These are issues I raised in the review I was asked to do by David Cameron and it’s very, very concerning that here we are three years later and these issues remain perennial.”

Lammy’s intervention came after his boss, Labour leader Keir Starmer, a former director of public prosecutions, said on Monday that he could see no justification for the use of handcuffs during the incident and he would “feel uncomfortable” if he were a senior officer watching the footage.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan also said he takes allegations of racial profiling “extremely seriously” and that he has raised the case with the force.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. So what is racial profiling?
      Black man &/or woman in Mercedes = drug traffickers.
      White man &/or woman in Mercedes = successful entrepreneurs.
      Linford Christie, accused the Met of institutional racism. Who can argue with that?

    2. As drivers of whatever ethnicity or societal status we might be we need to ask ‘does one stop immediately when a police vehicle indicates for you as a driver on the road (any road or street in any town or place) to pull over?’ They didn’t. According to known statements (on a radio interview) they ignored the police and proceeded in their tinted-windowed smart car to weave into and out of left turns and right turns via varied meandering “shortcuts” to get home – whereupon the police (what were they thinking about driver’s behaviour ignoring police signalling to pull over?) followed then detained them when they eventually stopped at their home destination. Police action after that takes on the dimension being presently reviewed, argued, discoursed as acceptable procedure or not or, as we note, of a racist nature. It still remains – they didn’t stop at the request of a police vehicle wanting them to pull over. One further asks that had they pulled over immediately they would likely not have been the [avoidable] detaining unpleasantness that resulted, as it transpired, to the ‘black celebrity couple’ from their not stopping immediately at the request of the police. Of course, there’s all the ongoing statistical issues about black people being stopped in smart cars more than white people. In which case do we decide now that black drivers in smart cars (maybe any car) shouldn’t be stopped – ever?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.