The home secretary caused a legal storm with an “ill-advised” tweet about the deaths of 39 migrants while the people-smuggling trial was going on.
On 23 October, the anniversary of the tragedy, Priti Patel’s Twitter account posted:
One year ago today, 39 people lost their lives in horrific circumstances at the hands of ruthless criminals. My thoughts remain with everyone who was affected by that day, particularly the loved ones of the people who so tragically died.
The comments were made as the prosecution of four alleged people-smugglers linked to the deaths was continuing at the Old Bailey.
Commenting on the post, one man wrote:
Dear Home Secretary. There is an active criminal trial ongoing. Your comments are ill advised and in case you are not au fait with such things, in contempt of court.
The post was retweeted and liked more than 300 times before it came to the attention of a defence lawyer and the trial was halted.
In the absence of the jury, Alisdair Williamson QC complained about the description of “ruthless criminals”, especially as she was a senior government minister.
It is unhelpful to say the least and a lot worse could be said. l don’t know what course could be taken. I know I don’t tweet personally. If action could be taken before the jury gets home.
I don’t know whether the court can invite the Government to delete that tweet?
Prosecutor Bill Emlyn Jones said:
Contact was made with the Home Secretary’s office but I have not been updated on any response.
Before he sent jurors home for the weekend, Justice Sweeney warned them to ignore comments on social media from politicians. He said:
It is a year today since the bodies of the victims were found. No doubt the anniversary will be commented on whether in mainstream media or social media.
And whether by politicians, likewise journalists or others, inevitably there is a risk that such comments may assert or imply guilt of amongst others the men who are in your charge, two of whom are charged with the manslaughter of the victims.
You must ignore any such comments.
It’s a fundamental principle of our criminal justice system that those on trial are presumed to be innocent until proven to be guilty and it is you and you alone who are going to decide whether they are guilty or not guilty.
The tweet was live for more than an hour before it was deleted.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) October 23, 2020
The incident came amid growing tension between government and the legal profession. The home secretary and prime minister Boris Johnson have faced repeated calls to apologise for “hostile” comments about the profession.
On the same day as Patel’s tweet, Sweeney also presided over a preliminary hearing for a man charged with a terrorist plot to kill a solicitor over his role in representing immigrants.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?