The SNP has been called out over its ‘contradictions’ when it comes to the Gaza genocide
Where does it stand?
Campaign group Palestine Action had highlighted a stark hypocrisy at the heart of the SNP over Palestine. On the one hand, one of its MPs has been calling for the UK to stop arms sales to Israel – while on the other. the Scottish ‘justice’ system is charging three protesters who tried to do exactly that.
Palestine Action: SNP-led state prosecuting them
On 21 February 2023, SNP MP Anum Qaisar spoke in Parliament to demand the UK stop arms exports to Israel, highlighting the use of British weaponry including laser targeting systems in Israel’s F-35 fighter jets. Simultaneously, Scotland are pursuing charges against three activists from Palestine Action for occupying Leonardo’s Edinburgh factory, manufacturers of the targeting systems mentioned.
On January 19 2023, three activists occupied and dismantled the roof of Leonardo’s weapons factory in Edinburgh. By doing so, they forced the factory closed and caused severe disruption to the production of laser targeting systems. The factory is touted by Leonardo as a specialist in ‘high-energy military lasers’, which are rigged to F-35 fighter jets, regularly used before and October 7th on deliberate attacks on Palestinian civilians.
For doing so, the three face an array of charges including malicious mischief and breach of the people. They will be on trial from April 2-5 at Edinburgh Sheriff Court.
Just where does the SNP stand?
Since 7 October, Israel’s F-35 fighter jets have been a staple in their genocidal campaign against the Palestinian people. In response, MP Anum Qaisar spoke in parliament to say:
Gaza is under siege from the air and the F-35 steal bomber often referred to as the most lethal fighter jet in the world, is being used. Parts for this fighter jet, the laser targeting system and the weapons release system are made in British factories…
Politics is all about choices. The UK government has a choice to stop or suspend arms export licenses to Israel, and there’s precedent far less… It’s morally corrupt, outrageous and sickens me to my core that the UK continues to sell arms to Israel.
In a previous case against activists from Palestine Action who occupied Thales’ weapons factory in Glasgow, three were found guilty of ‘malicious mischief’ after being disallowed to defend their actions as justified as they were done to save lives – a long established law. During the ongoing genocide in Gaza, Scotland remains complicit by allowing these factories to continue operating and criminalising those who act to stop them.
Practice what you preach
A Palestine Action spokesperson said:
Palestine Action are ready and willing to put our liberty on the line to shut down weapons companies such as Leonardo, in solidarity with the Palestinian people. However, it can not go unnoticed when political statements made contradict the prosecutions being pursued against those who are acting to stop the genocide in Gaza.
The SNP should practice what they preach and call for the charges to be dropped.
Featured image via Martin Pope/Palestine Action
Comments 3
Leave a Reply
The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX
Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.
For guest posting, contact [email protected]
For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]
© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings
The argument in the article is the same one made by Lee Anderson against Sadiq Khan ie that politicians control the police’s actions and that of the judiciary and should act in a certain way that they have failed to do.
The rebuttal is the same in both cases. The politicians do not exert day to day control over who is or is not prosecuted and for what offences nor how the judicial process against them is carried out.
In the case of Sadiq Khan it is alleged by Lee Anderson (and others on the far right) that the marchers are illegal but tolerated because they are “his mates” In this case the SNP stand accused of doing the opposite of what they would want to do and should interfere to prevent prosecution.
Whilst I agree with the reasons behind the protest and I agree that they should have the right to present the defence they choose I do not accept that politicians should interfere in the day to day running of policing and judiciary. We’ve seen throughout the world what happens when politicians do this. It’s fine when they’re doing something we agree with, something ‘righteous’ but this would not and is not always the case – in fact it rarely is.
If this weren’t coming from ‘The Canary’ then I would assume it was a cheap shot from the Labour Party to try and widen a perceived crack in the SNP vote for the forthcoming GE..
My thoughts entirely! It’s not the SNP’s place to comment on or try to influence the due legal process in a specific case, even if the party supports the sentiments that led to these protesters being arrested. I completely support Palestine Action’s aims, but encouraging politicians to weigh in to support a legal exception for a particular political cause, is a dangerous precedent. One always has to think about how a precedent like that might manifest if it was a far right politician agitating for a legal exception for a political cause close to their own heart. Like ElDee, I’m also wondering why The Canary is so keen to bash the SNP over something that they have little control over.
I agree with the above. As a party who have called for a ceasefire right from the start, this feels like a cheap shot at them. How much control do they have over these companies anyway? SNP appear to be hobbled by Westminster on many fronts.