• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

The latest government scandal threatens the rule of law, and something even more important [OPINION]

Sam Woolfe by Sam Woolfe
20 October 2016
in Science, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
161 12
A A
0
Home Other News & Features Science
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) has found that UK spy agencies have illegally invaded our personal lives for the past 17 years.

The illegal programmes in question have innocent enough sounding names: Bulk Communications Data (BCD) and Bulk Personal Datasets (BPD). But this linguistic trick diverts us from the scarier, and more accurate, name attached to such activity: blanket mass surveillance.

And if the charity that brought this case to the IPT hadn’t done so, we would have little idea how much our lives were being monitored and analysed.

The Snowden leaks revealed some of the very worst of the state’s surveillance activities. But thanks to this case, we now know they’ve been watching us, illegally, for much longer than we thought.

Business to carry on as usual

The Canary has previously highlighted how this case shows that our government is free to break the rules, or change them to avoid punishment. And this abuse of power means that business will very much carry on as usual.

GCHQ (the Government Communications Headquarters, pictured above) has not been told to delete the personal information it seized through the programmes, or to stop using it. And according to Privacy International, bulk data collection still requires no judicial or independent authorisation. So UK spy agencies are generally free to collect whatever data they want.

In addition, the Investigatory Powers Bill – currently in its final stages before being passed by Parliament – will hand over unprecedented powers to the same spying organisations criticised in the ruling.

The charity also warns that agencies can continue to share databases of collected bulk data with foreign intelligence agencies, contractors, and other local law enforcement agencies.

GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 attach little or no value to our privacy. Yet it’s a crucial right. And it’s essential to our freedom – to what makes us human.

Privacy matters, a lot

The saying goes that you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide. So we shouldn’t care if our personal information is collected and analysed in bulk. But Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who helped to publish Edward Snowden’s leaked documents, has illustrated perfectly why privacy matters to all of us.

First of all, he asserts, we can tell that privacy is incredibly important to us based on the fact that we would rarely give away our passwords to others. So how can we trust spies when we know that they abused their powers to spy on friends and family?

Everyone has something to hide. Not for nefarious reasons, necessarily, but to keep certain information away from the judgmental eyes of others. Having private lives defines us as people as much as having social lives does.

Psychological studies have also pointed to the importance of privacy, and the negative effects of mass surveillance. Most importantly, mass surveillance fosters distrust and conformity, and limits creativity and dissent.

A lack of privacy creates a kind of mental prison. Being monitored changes how you behave. It makes you more anxious about what you say to others, and what content you search for online. In a nutshell, it limits your freedom. It is a pernicious form of censorship, precisely because it is subtle and we don’t notice it. But if we sit back and accept the mentality of ‘I have nothing to hide’, then we only make it easier for the government to take away this integral freedom.

Get Involved!

– Support Privacy International, and the Open Rights Group.

Featured image via Flickr

Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Winter is hotting up for the Tories, as strike action by these courageous workers is announced

Next Post

The Sun has just been told it can be as racist as it wants, and no one will stop it [IMAGES]

Next Post
The Sun has just been told it can be as racist as it wants, and no one will stop it [IMAGES]

The Sun has just been told it can be as racist as it wants, and no one will stop it [IMAGES]

Right-wing media outlets to apologise in advance for lying

Right-wing media outlets to apologise in advance for lying

This decision by Norway makes a mockery of its green role model status

This decision by Norway makes a mockery of its green role model status

An extraordinary plot against the Wikileaks founder is foiled, as new evidence comes to light

This one image proves Jeremy Hunt has massacred our NHS in just two years (IMAGE, TWEETS)

If you're desperate to see a GP, Hunt's new scheme will make you pay

A man looks at photos of the children lost in the Minab tragedy in Iran
Global

Documentary on US bombing of Iran school to air in July

by Joe Glenton
16 June 2026
algeria
Analysis

Algerian national team introduces Kansas to football – and they love it.

by Joe Glenton
16 June 2026
A man with a prosthetic limb has legs crossed. The DWP is subjecting amputees to PIP reassessments.
Analysis

DWP wastes money by reassessing amputees for PIP

by Rachel Charlton-Dailey
16 June 2026
military ai
Analysis

Hundreds of human rights orgs demand end to military AI use of kill chains

by Joe Glenton
16 June 2026
Mike Tapp and Zack Polanski
Trending

A Labour minister is trying to get Zack Polanski arrested

by Willem Moore
16 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart