Marcus Rashford and other food poverty campaigners have called out inadequate free school meal parcels.
Several members of the public said the hampers did not contain enough food, and they would rather have vouchers.
The Department for Education has since promised to investigate the parcels, saying they:
should be nutritious and contain a varied range of food.
Then imagine we expect the children to engage in learning from home. Not to mention the parents who, at times, have to teach them who probably haven’t eaten at all so their children can…
We MUST do better. This is 2021 https://t.co/mEZ6rCA1LE
— Marcus Rashford (@MarcusRashford) January 11, 2021
Free school meals timeline
During last year’s term-time lockdown, the government provided families with a £15 voucher every week per pupil to spend on food.
According to the Food Foundation, 1.4 million children reported feeling food insecure over the summer holidays.
After MPs voted against continuing to provide free school meals during the October half-term, Rashford campaigned for a U-turn. He was partially successful, with the government extending free school meal provision.
The government promised free school meals would be available for eligible children during the current lockdown. Meals can be made available through:
- providing food parcels through the school catering team or food provider
- providing vouchers for a local shop or supermarket
- using the Department for Education’s national voucher scheme, which will reopen shortly
https://twitter.com/BootstrapCook/status/1348692385782444033
There is no dignity or respect here. The best way to loosen the grip of #FoodPoverty is to boost incomes directly through #UniversalCredit and Child Tax Credit. #FreeSchoolMeals https://t.co/oM9Iz6OB4R
— Joseph Rowntree Foundation (@jrf_uk) January 12, 2021
Accusations of profiteering
Some people have complained that food providers are profiting from the food hampers:
#FreeSchoolMeals On the left £30 of food. On the right what private company Chartwells have supplied having been awarded a government contract to supply for £30 free school meals.
Utterly shameful profiteering off some of the country's most disadvantaged kids! pic.twitter.com/XcmUm8qM1h
— MunchBunch (@Munchbunch87) January 11, 2021
https://twitter.com/RoadsideMum/status/1348651751759609859
One such company is Chartwells, a part of Compass Group. A Bristol headteacher previously criticised the company in March for its “shameful” food parcels.
Until December, Compass Group was chaired by Paul Walsh, former member of David Cameron’s business advisory group.
Children left hungry
Once again, this leaves many food insecure children without access to a healthy diet. This will only contribute further to the disproportionate effects of coronavirus (Covid-19) on disadvantaged children.
Rashford’s campaign includes thousands of supporters around the country offering food and drink to children in need. However, his real aim is to review food poverty at its roots, with all under-16s receiving free school meals if their parents receive benefits.
Featured image via YouTube/BBC News








This isn’t just profiteering. This is Tory Party profiteering.
p.s. What do you think SIR Keir Starmer?
Bread 89p
Beans 85p
Carrots 15p
Apples 42p
Potatoes 22p
Tomato 11p
Cheese £1.45
Frubes 33p
Pasta 10p
Soreen 40p
Bananas 30p
Starving children to make a quick buck – PRICELESS!
It appears this same company also provides meals for private schools which are so much different to what poor kids get. And they say there’s no class war?
https://twitter.com/genericshitname/status/1348795539152908294
I also heard more than twenty years ago that the meals for private schools are heavily subsidised by us taxpayers. One reason given was they have to provide three meals a day.
It’s nice to see one of the so-called ‘Thatcher kid’s’ (MunchBunch87) represents the moral silver lining that shines through despite the grey clouds of the nineteenth century Establishmentarian Poor Law charity notion that dominates our money hungry elite. It’s sad that as they got richer and richer the privateers became an insatiable cancer of the modern world. Not sure but I think there were a couple of people who warned about this sort of thing less than two hundred years ago. (Apolgies to MunchBunch87 if she wasn’t born in 1987.)
The Thatcherite myth that “the private sector do it better” once again debunked. They do it better for their directors and shareholders maybe, but not for those in receipt of their “services” (I use the term reservedly).