The most dangerous law of our time continues to be pushed through parliament

the 'Police spies out of lives' logo being projected onto a building
Support us and go ad-free

While most of the public are still distracted by coronavirus (Covid-19) headlines, the disgraceful Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) Bill, also known as the spycops bill, is quietly being debated in the House of Lords. Most of the proposed amendments – which would have made this bill ever so slightly less dangerous – have been rejected so far.

The spycops bill authorises covert agents, such as police officers, MI5 agents, or military personnel, to legally carry out what would usually be considered criminal conduct.

Why is the bill so dangerous?

There’s no limit to what counts as criminal conduct in the bill, so there will be no law prohibiting undercover operatives from carrying out murder, torture, or sexual offences.

And, of course, the bill will legalise all activity done by undercover police officers. It will give them the green light to continue deceiving women into sexual relationships. Campaign groups, activists, and families have been targeted by undercover police for decades. Police even spied on the family of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence. On top of this, over 30 women were deceived into having relationships with undercover police officers. Some of these spies also fathered, then abandoned, children with the women they tricked.

Rosa was deceived into a nine-year relationship with undercover police officer Jim Boyling and had two children with him. She told The Canary:

I am struck watching the courteous proceedings of this Bill which legislates for rape, murder and torture of its own citizens.

Meanwhile, an excruciatingly slow Undercover Policing Inquiry is currently underway, to examine the actions of the police units that employed over 140 police spies.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Lisa, who was deceived into a six-year relationship with undercover officer Mark Kennedy, is one of the participants. She told The Canary:

It is reckless in the extreme to be pushing through a bill before the undercover policing inquiry has concluded. They want to extend the scope of what’s allowed as undercover work without considering any of the consequences of how they have conducted themselves up until now.

Tom Fowler is another participant in the inquiry. He said:

It’s so ridiculously obscene, that just describing it in plain terms sounds like reckless hyperbole. That something as extreme as giving state agents total legal immunity without caveat has received very little resistance speaks to the direction of what remains of the UK ‘democracy’.

Keir Starmer supports the bill

Back in October, Labour leader Keir Starmer ordered his MPs to abstain on the third reading of the bill. But 34 Labour politicians broke the party whip, voting against the bill in the House of Commons.

Starmer argued his support for the bill:

You’re not allowed to sign an authorisation if what you’re authorising will break the Human Rights Act. Under the Human Rights Act, torture is completely prohibited, murder is prohibited, rape is prohibited.

So this argument that you could sign off torture, murder and rape is just wrong.

But human rights organisations, including Reprieve, jointly argued:

There is no express prohibition on authorising crimes that would constitute human rights violations, including murder, torture (e.g. punishment shootings), kidnap, or sexual offences, or on conduct that would interfere with the course of justice;

The Bill relies on the Human Rights Act as a safeguard, despite the Government making clear that it does not believe that the Human Rights Act applies to abuses committed by its agents, even torture.

So, has the House of Lords changed the proposed bill much?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, most proposed amendments to the bill were defeated in the House of Lords. One proposed amendment, which would require a judge to approve authorisations to commit crimes under CHIS, was even voted against:

Kevin Blowe, coordinator of Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), told The Canary:

While some have tried to find ways to amend the bill, Netpol opposes it outright. It is dangerous and authoritarian and tinkering with it at the margins will never make it any less harmful. That is what has made the main opposition party’s refusal to oppose it, so as not to look “weak” on security issues, so deeply disappointing.

The bill will continue to be debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday 13 January. As it reaches its final stages, it’s important that we don’t let it slip under the radar. We need to oppose it at every single stage.

Featured image via Police Spies Out Of Lives

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. It’s worth noting that most police spies or agente provocoteurs spy on harmless organisations that either abhor cruelty to animals, environmental destruction or the notion of nuclear war, in other words pacifists, and lovers of life in general. One has to suspect any State that fear’s it’s most peaceful and sensitive citizens, whose only concern is the common weal, and be saddened that most of the general population appear to share that fear. Give the police the powers of the Gestapo and some South American state police and the crowds that fill our football stadiums will not be relieved fans who want to buy an ever changing array of new kits!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.