• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Author explains how ‘corporate America is pushing back against Sanders’

Slava Zilber by Slava Zilber
16 March 2020
in Feature, Global
Reading Time: 6 mins read
170 4
A A
0
Home Other News & Features Feature
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The Canary recently spoke to the Intercept‘s Ryan Grim about his new book – We’ve Got People: From Jesse Jackson to AOC, the End of Big Money and the Rise of a Movement. And he explained how “corporate America is pushing back” against progressive presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders because of the threat he represents to their power.

Alternative political funding is essential

Grim described how, in his book, he looks at “conflicting approaches toward building a political movement withinside a political party”. He highlighted how money is essential to doing this in the US. “In the late 1970s, early 1980s, the Democratic Party turned toward big money”, he said, in an attempt to compete with the Republicans. But this resulted in the party becoming “much more friendly to the corporations that it was now hitting up for money”.

There’s also an alternative to raising money, however. And it has fuelled Sanders’s election campaign. As Grim stressed:

The counter-movement… is small dollars from individual people who are giving five to 10 dollars a month to keep campaigns going. And they, in turn, produce entirely different politics.

Grim elaborated by talking about ActBlue – a “platform that almost exclusively serves as a vehicle through which small donors give their money to Democratic campaigns”. He said:

it took ActBlue, which was founded in the early 2000s, maybe 15 years to raise their first billion dollars. And then it took just one more year after that to raise its second billion dollars. So the numbers are climbing exponentially to the point where they are now able to not just counter / balance out big money, but in fact – in this presidential race – to beat it.

This, he highlighted, has made the grassroots-focused Sanders competitive in a race where other candidates have relied on billionaires for funding.

The current media environment, however, is “highly dangerous”

Grim also addressed Sanders’s criticism of the media, saying:

I think it’s fair as criticism. I think it’s not fair as complaint. Sanders wants to overthrow the reigning political establisment and its alliance with corporate America. You can’t expect the political establishment and corporate America to just roll over and allow that to happen. So I think, for very good reasons, corporate America is pushing back against Sanders. He is a threat to them. And I don’t see his criticism as remotely really controversial.

He then emphasised that:

The media situation in the United States is a disaster. … We’re at a place where a significant amount of the news outlets today are funded and owned by billionaires…

It’s highly dangerous, long-term, for the country – no doubt about it.

Imagine if the media wasn’t against Sanders…

The Canary also spoke previously to Katie Halper, co-host of the podcasts The Katie Halper Show and Useful Idiots. She has documented the media bias towards Sanders, and she said:

It’s really incredible that, given how biased the media is, that Bernie has any support. Imagine how well he’d be doing if the media weren’t dedicated to totally smearing him.

[Sanders] calls out the media… narratives like when he says he won’t apologise for opposing the Iraq war. … I think that the more people are aware of media bias, the more they support Sanders.

She stressed in particular that:

The thing about the Post and Politico and the New York Times is they are so shameless in their hatred of Sanders they don’t even hide it … The Washington Post famously had 16 negative Sanders stories within 16 hours. Jennifer Rubin writes, I think, two pieces, one day apart, slamming Bernie. It is like they are addicts. They don’t even know how to cover it up anymore.

And she argued:

The guy [Sanders] can do nothing right. He is either cheap or he spends too much money. He is either too fringe or he is unnecessary because now his ideas are too popular.

Two massive issues

Media bias and political funding are two giant issues in US politics. And they will continue to be a major obstacle for Sanders (and all progressives) for the foreseeable future. But the fightback has already begun.

https://soundcloud.com/conversationswithslava/weve-got-people-an-interview-with-ryan-grim

https://soundcloud.com/conversationswithslava/sen-sanders-and-the-corporate-media

Featured image via Gage Skidmore

Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Amid increasing hostility, a new film exposes US regime-change efforts in Nicaragua

Next Post

Hospitality industry facing ruin as leaders demand state help

Next Post
Hospitality industry facing ruin as leaders demand state help

Hospitality industry facing ruin as leaders demand state help

Covid-19: Teachers’ union accuses Government of creating ‘chaos and confusion’

Red squirrel population in Scotland remains stable – report

Red squirrel population in Scotland remains stable – report

Boris Johnson and Salvador Illa

The UK and Spain make coronavirus plans to use private healthcare, with one glaring difference

Pauline Latham

A Tory MP showed her true colours over coronavirus. Her excuse isn't fooling anyone.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

trump
Analysis

US House votes to restrict Trump’s power trip over Iran

by HG
4 June 2026
Robert Jenrick and Nigel Farage of Reform, and Kemi Badenoch
Trending

Jenrick struggles to defend Reform’s latest smear campaign

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026
Gaming and misogyny
Analysis

I’m a female gamer — I’m done with the industry’s misogyny

by Antifabot
4 June 2026
west bank
Analysis

Israel destroys vital fruit and veg market in West Bank

by Charlie Jaay
4 June 2026
Darren Jones
Skwawkbox

Starmeroid would-be leader Darren Jones cosied up to Mandelson

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart