Small predators like spiders and ladybirds are the most likely to be lost when natural habitats are converted for human use, research suggests. These are creatures that play a crucial role in ecosystems.
A global study on the impact of human land use on different groups of animals found that predators, especially small invertebrates, are the most likely to suffer when natural habitats are transformed to agricultural land or towns and cities.
Also disproportionately affected were small ectotherms – cold-blooded animals such as invertebrates, reptiles and amphibians; large endotherms – mammals and birds; and fungivores – animals that eat fungi.
There were reductions in abundance of 25%-50% compared with surviving natural habitats.
Researchers looked at more than a million records of animal abundance at sites ranging from primary forest to intensively managed farmland and cities.
The data represented more than 25,000 species across 80 countries, which were grouped by size, whether they were warm or cold-blooded and what they eat.
Species ranged from the tiny oribatid mite to an African elephant weighing 3,825kg.
Tim Newbold at University College London, the lead author of the research, said: “Normally when we think of predators, we think of big animals like lions or tigers.
“These large predators did not decline as much as we expected with habitat loss, which we think may be because they have already declined because of human actions in the past (such as hunting).
“We find small predators – such as spiders and ladybirds – to show the biggest declines.”
According to the study, published in the British Ecological Society journal Functional Ecology, the results indicate the world’s ecosystems are being restructured with disproportionate losses at the top of the food chain.
Dr Newbold added: “We know that different types of animals play important roles within the environment – for example, predators control populations of other animals.
“If some types of animals decline a lot when we lose natural habitats, then they will no longer fulfil these important roles.”
The conversion of land to human use is associated with the removal of large amounts of natural plant biomass – usually to make space for livestock and crops.
The study is part of the Predicts project which explores how biodiversity responds to human pressures.
Researchers analysed 1,184,543 records of animal abundance in the Predicts database, gathered from 460 published scientific studies.
The type of land use at each of the 13,676 sample sites was classified from the description of the habitat in the source publication.
The six broad categories were primary vegetation, secondary vegetation, plantation forest, cropland, pasture and urban.
Three levels of human use intensity were also recorded – minimal, light and intense.
Dr Newbold said: “As with all global studies, we are limited in the information that is available to us about where animals are found and what they eat.
“We were able to get information for more animals than ever before, but this was still only around one out of every 100 animals known to science.”
The researchers are interested in exploring how groups of animals that play particularly important roles for agriculture, such as pollinating or controlling crop pests, are affected by habitat loss.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?