Minister forced to backtrack on care homes policy claims

Support us and go ad-free

A minister has become embroiled in a row after apparently saying that policies blamed for the high rate of Covid-19 deaths in care homes were based on scientific advice.

The movement of elderly patients into residential care without testing them for coronavirus in order to free up hospital beds has been blamed for the high death toll in care homes – accounting for around 57% of all fatalities.

Care minister Helen Whately was forced to backtrack on Sky News on Tuesday morning after appearing to claim this decision was guided by science.

When quizzed by Kay Burley over the policy, Whately said: “As we have learned more about the virus we have updated those infection control guidance, we have taken more steps, we have done the social care action plan.

“At all points in this we have followed the scientific guidance.”

Burley replied: “And then you make the policy – you take (scientists’) advice and then you make the policy – you can’t stick this on the scientists.

The MP responded: “But I can, because…”

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Burley said: “You can stick it on the scientists?”

“No, no, no – that is not what I mean to say,” Whatley replied.

Burley said: “You just said you can stick this on the scientists – either you can or you can’t.”

“To be clear, that is your words,” Whatley responded.

Burley said: “I said ‘You can’t stick this on the scientists’ and you said you can – I didn’t put those words in your mouth.”

Whatley responded: “What I mean to say is that we have taken the scientific advice at every stage of this process – we have taken the scientific advice and then judgment is made about what is the right decision to take.”

She continued: “We have been trying to do everything we can for those in care homes because we know that they are at greater risk.”

Data published by NHS England in early June revealed an increase in the number of patients discharged to care homes in March.

It showed that the number of patients transferred to homes – as a proportion of all hospital discharges – rose from 2.2% at the start of March to 3.5% by the end of the month.

It had dropped back to 2.3% by April 16.

The government has defended its track record on care homes, with health secretary Matt Hancock insisting in the Commons last month that a “ring of protection” had been thrown around them from the very start of the crisis.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said previously: “We have been working tirelessly with the care sector to reduce transmission and save lives, and have based all our decisions on the latest scientific and clinical advice – as a result nearly two-thirds of care homes have had no outbreak at all.”

Last month, work and pensions secretary Thérèse Coffey was also accused of trying to deflect criticism from government policy by laying the blame at scientists’ door.

Speaking to Sky News on 19 May, she said: “If the science was wrong, advice at the time was wrong, I’m not surprised if people then think we made a wrong decision.”

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Of course they’re going to blame scietists or any one they can. The Tories let CV19 in & did nothing to stop it & they’re now thrashing about looking for someone to blame………………
      Boris was hoping for a smooth run to Brexit & re-election but a little virus upset his apple cart & now doen’t know what to do & has surrounded himself with like-minded clowns so we race to a Tory made catastrophe…….but it’s our fault for not keeping 2 mtrs apart & wanting to get back to work too soon, etc. You see! That noise you hear is the whitewash being mixed………….

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.