Social services association chief says under-resourcing caused thousands of lives to be lost ‘prematurely in social care’

The Canary

Some 27% of social services directors said patients were discharged to providers where there wasn’t sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE), a survey has found.

The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (Adass), which asked its members about the rapid discharge of patients to the community in March to free up hospital beds, also found that 24% said patients had been taken to settings where they couldn’t self-isolate amid the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic.

“Ill-equipped and under-resourced”

Adass president James Bullion said thousands of people “lost their lives prematurely in social care” because the sector was “ill-equipped and under-resourced” to deal with the pandemic.

Directors also believe a lack of testing during this period could have accelerated the speed of coronavirus spreading in care settings. The report said:

Given what we know about the spread of Covid-19 in care home settings in particular, it is obviously greatly concerning that untested individuals were potentially discharged to settings that had insufficient PPE and also to where a suspected Covid-19 positive individual could not isolate safely.

Concerns remain about the availability and frequency of testing for people receiving social care, unpaid carers and personal assistants, Adass said.

Bullion said a key lesson was that “emptying acute hospital beds without considering the impact on social care can have huge consequences”. He also added that there had been no “wilful intention” to take the infection to care homes. He continued:

A focus on rapid discharge when there were shortages of PPE, questions about testing and the ability to isolate people in social care meant that some people ended up in the wrong place to meet their needs and with insufficient community support or reablement to help them get home. We must change our approach.

Coronavirus
Directors were surveyed about the rapid discharge of patients to the community in March to free up hospital beds (Victoria Jones/PA)

A report by NHS Providers in May said suggestions that NHS trusts knowingly and systematically discharged coronavirus patients into care homes to free up beds were “damaging and mistaken”. Trust leaders told the membership body they consistently followed government guidance and only discharged known or suspected coronavirus patients if care homes had capacity to safely care for them.

Increase in unmet needs and lack of mental health services

Some 146 out of 151 directors of social services in England responded to the Adass survey between 1-22 May. Directors estimated nearly a quarter (22%) of those discharged during the rapid discharge period did not go to the most appropriate setting for their needs. It comes as the number of people needing help from social services has risen, which Adass said was due to the temporary closure of some services and “understandable” concerns from providers about accepting new people.

Almost a quarter of directors said that unmet needs in their area had increased by 1% to 5%. Some 40% believe there are not sufficient mental health services in their area, while 30% believe this to be the case for local substance misuse services. Bullion said services need more government funding “if we are not to face a tsunami of need and an imbalance of resources going forwards”.

There’s also been a “concerning decline” reported by 35% of local authorities in people coming forward for help for domestic abuse and safeguarding issues. The report said:

There is little reason to assume that these needs would have reduced in those areas, rather that people are more reluctant to approach councils, or issues are occurring within domestic settings.

Ultimately it means that some people are not getting the help and support they need.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us