Jewish anti-racist Jackie Walker speaks about resisting ‘a major witch hunt’
Jackie Walker is a Jewish supporter of Palestinian rights who has faced off allegations of antisemitism in recent years. And she recently spoke to me about her ordeal.
A ‘professional anti-racist’
She began by explaining her background, saying:
I’m not just an activist… I was also professionally an anti-racist. So I was an adviser/teacher on anti-racism as well as going on demonstrations etc about anti-racist practice, because the reason my parents were together was because of the civil rights movement. And in the 1950s, if you even think about America, which is where I was born at that point, which was at the height of McCarthyism, and you had a white man and a black woman having a long-term relationship which produced two children – they were obviously very conscious of the barriers they were crossing. And the reason my mother was deported from America was because of her political activities…
So I’ve got these two identities, both Ashkenazi Jewish and Black, from the African diaspora, from Jamaica. And the coincidence of those two things means that… I feel I have to speak up.
“A major witch hunt”
She continued by highlighting what she considers a “major” attack on left-wingers who support Palestinian rights:
We’re in the stranglehold of a major witch hunt in British politics. We’ve never seen anything like it. If you want to talk about existential threats, we are having the most dangerous existential threat to the left that there’s been in modern history, and I’m not exaggerating that.
[At] the Labour Party conference, there was a bomb threat where he said – whoever the person was said – that they were going to kill a lot of people. Now, of course, nobody in the media reported that. Extraordinary. I mean I just want you to consider what would have happened if this show was being put on by a Zionist group, a Jewish Zionist group. It would have been all over the papers.
Read on...
This show was being put on by a non-Zionist Jewish group, and it wasn’t mentioned, at all. At the same time, a member of a group that I’m… partly in…, Jewish Voice for Labour, was actually attacked on the streets. There, we have had threats of rape and murder. And again, the extraordinary thing is the fact that this has not been reported, at all, … in any media.
Media bias
Speaking about how media outlets have treated the allegations against her, she said:
They have no interest in balance. They have a total agenda. So for example, you take the Guardian, that used to be a liberal newspaper. We can see what their agenda is and has been right from the start. And they will write article after article after article, and certainly Jessica Elgot, who is the person – she was originally a reporter for the Jewish Chronicle, then was employed by the Guardian – and she has written, I don’t even know how many. Maybe 20 articles have referred to me, maybe more… Not once, not once has she come to me to check her story. Not once. And I wrote her a very, very polite invitation, maybe about six months ago, saying ‘perhaps it would be a good idea, as you seem to have focused so much of your work on me, for us to meet’. I didn’t even get a response. So… a decision has been made, somewhere, that normal practice does not apply against Jackie Walker.
Another example – Panorama. … I was sitting there, watching it… and up I came again. And all the kind of tricks of the documentary trade were used. So there was spooky music when I came on, there was a kind of sickle moon, and there was trembling of the beats, of the rhythm, that happened as well. So I find it quite extraordinary.
Blair’s legacy remains in the Labour Party…
Asked if she regrets no longer being in the Labour Party, Walker stressed:
I feel that actually I’m really freed up. I mean, I can say things about what’s happening in the party that I couldn’t possibly say as a Labour Party member. And that is difficult for a lot of members. I mean, I think the structures of the Labour Party are the leftovers of the… Blair structures that were put into place to silence members, and to keep them kind of on a particular track which included being Zionist, which included being neoconservative, you know, that whole sort of economic agenda. And I think a lot of us during those years sort of held our nose and voted Labour.
Speaking about the situation today, she said:
So what you’ve got is, you’ve got a left which has been under huge amounts of pressure, and not unified on this subject. There have been some groups and some individuals who decided that the witch hunt had a basis to it. Not in terms of any evidence, not in terms of any data. But they felt they had to respond to it in a very particular way. And that has meant that the response from the left has not been unified. …
You have the bulk of the members on one side, bulk of the activists on one side, and on the other side you have the parliamentary Labour Party. You have the leadership, who was so busy trying to keep the media and the parliamentary Labour Party happy – an impossible task, of course – … that they are not really taking account of what’s happening to the membership.
Featured image via screenshot
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
“[At] the Labour Party conference, there was a bomb threat where he said – whoever the person was said – that they were going to kill a lot of people. Now, of course, nobody in the media reported that. ”
That is, of course, not true.
Please clarify what it is you assert to be untrue. A bomb threat being made, the person making the threat saying words to the effect of those quoted, or news media not covering the ‘incident adequately?
Smythe-Mogg, it is untrue that “nobody in the media reported the bomb threat” and the intention “to kill a lot of people”. A few seconds of searching on the internet shows Walker’s assertion to be false. Interestingly, if you hover over the words “a bomb threat” in the article, the URL https://www.timesofisrael.com/bomb-threat-clears-out-jewish-sponsored-screening-at-labour-confab/ appears, but if you click on the link, it takes you to a Canary article about it at https://www.thecanary.co/uk/2018/09/25/breaking-bomb-threat-disrupts-screening-of-film-by-israel-critic-jackie-walker-2/. I wonder why that might be.
“The Board of Deputies has condemned an “antisemitic bomb threat” that was made at Labour Party conference against a meeting of a pro-Jeremy Corbyn fringe Jewish group.
Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) held a screening in Liverpool on Tuesday night of The Lynching, a film by Jackie Walker, a party activist, about her suspension from Labour over controversial comments about Jews.
But shortly after the film began, a bomb threat to the building was made by phone.
The Board tweeted: “We utterly condemn the antisemitic bomb threat made to those attending a fringe event at the Labour conference.
“We hope the perpetrators of this racist act will be found & prosecuted. This latest threat underscores the need for all parties to take antisemitism seriously.”
The Jewish Chronicle – https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jewish-voice-for-labour-forced-to-cancel-event-after-antisemitic-bomb-threat-1.470216
It would appear we need some understanding of what or who ‘the media’ is in this ‘failure of the media’ reporting a serious ‘potential terrorist bomb incident’ at the Labour Party Conference of 2018. If the The Jewish Chronicle, a London based newpaper of a readership stated for 2018 of just over 20,000 is considered ‘media’ that’s fine. In which case we might consider that weird print of the Fortean Times being a disseminator of wonderful hocus-pocus equally part of the media as well having a readership of almost 15,000 for 2018. In other words, how much in number of a readership constitutes ‘the media’? Is amount of readership the determinant as to what constitutes a certain periodical, magazine, newspaper whether hardcopy or digitally read as ‘the media’? The bomb incident occurred at a fringe Labour Party meeting and, it would appear, was reported, albeit by a fringe newspaper, by The Jewish Chronicle not readily observed on newsstands alongside more well known daily or weekly prints.
How about the Guardian, Microbe? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/25/jewish-event-at-labour-conference-abandoned-after-bomb-scare