A BBC host’s jaw-dropping response to a bombshell from Boris Johnson’s sister

Rachel Johnson
Support us and go ad-free

During an appearance on BBC Radio 4‘s World at One show on 26 September, Rachel Johnson dropped a bombshell about her brother. And the BBC host’s reaction was absolutely jaw-dropping too.

It could be…

During the interview, Johnson spoke about what she thought was behind the PM’s “strongman gambit” in getting the UK out of the EU. After noting her brother’s role, and the role of his chief adviser Dominic Cummings, she said:

It also could be from, who knows, people who have invested billions in shorting the pound or shorting the country in the expectation of a no-deal Brexit. We don’t know.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

To be clear, that’s the PM’s sister raising the prospect that billionaires set to make a mint off the UK leaving the EU without a deal ‘could be’ playing a role in Johnson’s determination to leave by 31 October. That’s a bombshell and a half.

This is, however, how host Sarah Montague responded to it:

But you obviously think those are factors. Umm, do you think your brother is enjoying this?

He’s loving it

That’s right. The BBC host just moved swiftly on to a subject as inane as ‘is he enjoying it?’. The PM’s sister responded by saying “I think he’s loving it”.

I don’t imagine the chaos is the only thing he’s loving, either. Because the BBC host’s choice to essentially run away from the explosive subject of whether financiers play a role in his Brexit strategy probably came as a delight too.

Featured image via Sky News/YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This has been obvious since the very beginning – it’s a disaster capitalists wet dream in the making.

      Byline Media published this report weeks ago, yet no-one has challenged Johnson on it. https://bylinetimes.com/2019/09/11/brexit-disaster-capitalism-8-billion-bet-on-no-deal-crash-out-by-boris-johnsons-leave-backers/

      This should be Cobyn’s sole line of attack in every single session of Parliament until it is answered. Hammer this point relentlessly for the next month and the fuckers will have to answer.

      1. Yes, that is the point Mr Corbyn ought keep raising.

        Johnson’s odious nature and capacity for making gratuitously hurtful remarks speak for themselves. The Opposition need do little more than act as if dealing with an obnoxious child.

        What requires stressing within and without Parliament is the nature of that which Johnson and his co-conspirators, some ostensibly unconnected with politics but skilled at buying influence, seek to achieve. They want to consolidate neo-liberalism and make it irreversible.

        A substantial proportion o

        1. … of the electorate have experienced nothing other than the ‘Thatcher legacy’. Also, it’s doubtful many understand the implications of the term. The word ‘liberal’ has good connotations as well as bad: derived meanings include ‘tolerant’ and ‘libertine’ (the latter oddly apt in this context).

          The message to put across is that neo-liberal doctrine led to the 2008/9 financial crash, that ‘bailing out’ (and ‘in’) are responses consistent with dogma, and ‘austerity’ imposed upon others is a natural measure for avaricious narcissists to take.

          Few voters have any idea of what goes on in the City of London. ‘Deregulation’ and ‘financialisation’ pass over people’s heads. Endemic corruption in, and of, markets is barely mentioned by mainstream media. Yet, all these and other factors too, touch on ordinary people through ‘austerity’, wage stagnation, rising house prices, barely controlled rentals, inadequate public services, and the perilous position of some pension schemes.

          Virtues flowing from re-introduction of regulation, from stamping on corruption, from reducing wealth disparity, from accepting that public utilities and health services should not be run solely on a for-profit basis, along with other reforms, need explanation in simple terms.

          Mr Corbyn and many of his immediate circle are well able to give the lie to neo-liberalism and to expose the venal nature of people seeking to exploit Brexit for personal gain.

      1. On the contrary the siblings are said to be unusually close. Both Rachel and brother Jo were there supporting Boris Johnson when the result making him Tory leader was announced. This makes their recent actions very significant.

        I listened to the broadcast and was also badly disappointed (though not surprised) when Sarah Montague simply ignored Rachel’s bombshell.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.