Trade secretary Liz Truss has admitted that the UK sold arms to Saudi Arabia unlawfully on at least three occasions. The sales are in violation of a court order banning arms trade with Saudi Arabia due to human rights concerns.
Lack of communication
Earlier in September, Truss confirmed that the government breached the court order ban on two separate occasions. Her recent admission confirms a third instance, and she’s suggested that other cases could still come to light. Responding to an urgent question in the House of Commons, Truss said:
We have identified one further licence that has been granted in breach of the undertaking.
Truss went on to offer “an unreserved apology” and placed the blame on a lack of internal communication between departments. She also claimed the license wasn’t used and “has now been revoked”.
The Ministry of Defence recommended that the license to which Truss referred receive approval, which was then signed off by the Department of International Trade (DIT). Following Truss’s remarks, DIT issued a statement which admits:
Given that RSLF [Royal Saudi Land Force] troops were being deployed in Yemen at the time… this licence should not have been granted.
Calls to resign
Truss’s latest admission met with criticism from the opposition. In response, Labour MP Keith Vaz said:
The apology is welcome but the narrative is shameful … Last week a bomb fell on a mosque and on a family eating their dinner. What do they put on the death certificates? Is it death by administrative error?
Does she take full responsibility for her department’s unlawful award of arms export licences in contravention of the court of appeal and therefore will she do the right thing and resign?
Law has also said:
The Tory government is either completely incompetent or it is deliberately breaking the law with impunity.
Featured image via YouTube/ Sky News
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?