‘NATO is a threat to the very survival of life on earth’, says peace campaigner Medea Benjamin
Medea Benjamin, of the US-based peace group CODEPINK, joined hundreds of people in bitterly cold London on 3 December to denounce US president Donald Trump and the western military alliance of NATO. The demonstration and speeches began in Trafalgar Square and then slowly moved to Buckingham Palace where leaders of NATO countries, including president Trump, were reportedly having dinner.
‘NATO always needs an enemy’
Benjamin, a veteran peace activist, told The Canary she came to the UK to ‘Say No to NATO’ because:
NATO is all about militarism and it [always] needs an enemy. Right now it is bogged down for 20 years in Afghanistan. NATO decided to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi and destroyed Libya and now won’t take responsibility for it or for the refugees fleeing from there. And NATO is looking for a new enemy. It might be Russia, it might be China, it might be some vague continuation of the ‘War on Terror’, but NATO needs an enemy because it’s a military alliance and part of the push is for countries to spend more money on the military.
Spending on militarism detracts from other priorities such as health care
Many of the signs and placards called for defending the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), opposition to austerity, and any trade with the US which would sell off parts of the NHS to profiteers. The NHS has been subject to forty years of privatisation by stealth, according to the new documentaries The Great NHS Heist and John Pilger’s The Dirty War on the NHS. And it’s in the final stages of privatisation, according to activist GP and …Heist producer Dr Bob Gill.
Benjamin said that Trump’s administration has “exacerbated” the problem of shifting money towards militarism and away from social programmes. Trump has been “obsessed with pushing countries to spend 2% of their GDP on the military” she said.
The result is that the money for increased military spending will come from “health care budgets” and “education”, Benjamin explained.
NATO is an ‘existential threat’
She said that increased military spending ‘robs’ the areas “where we really need to spend our money”, such as on a “Green New Deal to save the planet”.
Read on...
“So I think NATO is a threat to the very survival of life on earth because it sucks up billions of dollars that we need to address the climate crisis”, Benjamin said, “and because it pushes an arms race including a nuclear arms race, that is an existential threat to life on this planet”.
Featured image via Mohamed Elmaazi
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Medea Benjamin doesn’t grasp on which side her bread is buttered. Without NATO we would be overrun by hordes of fierce Russians. Survivors of invasion (i.e. NATO officials) would crawl out of their bunkers to be confronted by a life style akin to that of the Middle Ages. US culture, the glory embodied by Hollywood, would forever be denied to mankind. Also, don’t imagine Russians, inbred to embody meanness, would share natural gas during long hard winters.
Gosh! Your sarcasm puts Felicity Smoak to shame.
Isn’t sarcasm frequently operated as a smokescreen for ‘something else’ goin’ on – e.g. as an indicator of a disgruntled, insecure character?
NATO needs reminding it wasn’t Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela or Bolivia that set the Middle East on fire. It was us. WE ARE the bad guys.
If Nato enshrined what it was created to protect in the first place. Liberty of the individual, freedom for public discourse, the social psychosis of evil we’d be fine, but in my observations no one can be that human for so long.
Nato has been taken over by the military industrial complex as forewarned by President Eisenhower who was the American Allied General calling the final shots in WW2. This was a real and perceived danger after the war,
That was 60 years ago.
Now you have incompetent leaders for the 21st century with lots of weapons to use at their discretion to solve any ” problems” of social incompatibility.
This viewpoint now enshrined is a threat to the survival of earth as we would of liked it to be.
A nice place.
I think this mindscape will conquer the planet not realizing the planet doesn’t have a social adgenda.
It doesn’t have weapons for one thing.
It’s that simple these warrior people aren’t bright enough to see it.
This evil social psyhcosis of our leadership is the one to be worried about as it was after WW2 and seeing what happened with the Jews, the Georgians, and the other holocosts since then.
Ideology has no favorite people it plays with.
Its deadly and needs no financing.