“This is the last time you’ll hear my voice”, pleads refugee deported to notorious offshore gulag
Loghman Sawari is a young refugee who fled Iran after his cousin was executed by the regime and his brothers imprisoned. After being illegally renditioned by Australia to its offshore gulag on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea (PNG), Sawari suffered isolation and beatings. He also attempted suicide.
He spectacularly fled to Fiji from PNG, where he was held illegally at the behest of the Australian government.
On his arrival in Fiji, a local family sheltered him. He wished to claim asylum immediately. But his lawyer, Aman Ravindra-Singh, had an agreement with Fiji’s director of immigration that his client could lodge his application for asylum later, so that he could organise his paperwork. That agreement turned out to be a ruse.
Kidnapped again
It was on the way with his lawyer to the immigration minister’s office that Sawari was snatched, dragged to a waiting car and driven off at speed. He was taken to a waiting plane at Nadi Airport.
It could have proved very embarrassing to Australia had Sawari been allowed to lodge his asylum claim. Details of his kidnapping by Australia, his rendition and imprisonment would then have been fully revealed.
Fears for his life
Sawari is now back on PNG and fears for his life. Before he left Fijian soil, he made a final phone call to a friend. He said:
This is the last time you’ll hear my voice and I know they’ll kill me.
Read on...
UN condemnation
A UNHCR statement condemned the action of the Fijian authorities, saying that the deportation of Sawari, a bona fide refugee, was in breach of the 1951 Refugee Convention [pdf]. The statement added that the UNHCR is “profoundly concerned for his welfare”.
Human Rights Watch Australia director Elaine Pearson said Sawari’s deportation from Fiji was a blatant violation of the refugee convention:
Whether Loghman entered the country legally or not is irrelevant. So long as Australia keeps flouting its international obligations to asylum seekers and refugees, it will give a green light to other countries in the region to do the same.
Should Sawari be harmed (or worse, his life taken), then the person ultimately responsible for that would be Australia’s Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
Refugees and the Trump effect
Turnbull’s judgement has also been brought into question with regard to the fate of hundreds of other refugees held on Manus and on Nauru. The now infamous telephone conversation between him and US President Donald Trump has highlighted again the latter’s bullying nature. Trump followed up the call with a tweet in his usual style:
Do you believe it? The Obama Administration agreed to take thousands of illegal immigrants from Australia. Why? I will study this dumb deal!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2, 2017
Refugee deal in jeopardy
Turnbull hoped that Australia’s disastrous offshore refugee programme could be solved via a goodwill deal. That deal would see 1,250 refugees held on Nauru and Manus Island relocated to the US and other countries.
But that deal is now seriously in doubt. Given that Trump has made it clear that all the refugees President Obama agreed to resettle would be subject to ‘extreme vetting’. And given that the majority of refugees held on Nauru and Manus Island are from Iran and other countries banned under Trump’s executive order.
Turnbull must now either accept all the offshore-held refugees or relocate them to other safe countries. But if he has not got the political will to do so, the UN should intervene and organise the relocation.
Get Involved!
– Support the Refugee Council of Australia. Read more about the abuse of refugees in Australia here.
– Read The Canary‘s previous articles on Australia and refugees.
– Seen more international reporting from The Canary Global.
Feature image via Wikimedia Commons
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
