The US has re-joined the Paris Agreement. But it’s not enough to save our climate.

Joe Biden climate change
Support us and go ad-free

The US has re-joined the Paris Agreement and committed to climate action. But experts and activists warn challenges remain.

On the first day of his presidency, Joe Biden signed an executive order taking the US back into the Paris Accords. This order undid his predecessor’s rejection of the agreement, and leaders across the world hailed the order as a positive.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Despite this, as researchers continue to document the increasing consequences of global warming, some experts and activists say climate action must go further.

The Paris Agreement

In 2015, 196 countries undertook the Paris Agreement, a treaty with the aim of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

The agreement required national governments to submit plans setting out how they would reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement also said richer countries should assist lower-income countries in adapting and reducing emissions.

In 2017, Donald Trump announced the US would leave the Paris Agreement, a withdrawal that was formally completed on 4 November 2020. The US represented 15% of all global emissions as of 2020, leading many climate experts to criticise the withdrawal decision.

‘We have not done enough’

Even as the US brings some hope to climate goals, experts warn current policies are lacking. According to organisations Climate Analytics and New Climate Institute, continuing on current policies would not achieve the 1.5°C goal.

The organisations predict that current policies have a likelihood greater than 97% of putting us on a pathway to a temperature increase of more than 2°C.

Speaking to the Guardian, former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said:

We have lost a lot of time. Five years after the agreement in Paris was adopted with huge expectations and commitment by world leaders, we have not done enough.

Continuing emissions

Regardless of their participation in the agreement, countries across the world remain involved in fossil fuel production.

The UN Environment Programme reported in December that many countries plan to increase fossil fuel production in the coming years. One of the authors of the report warned that moving beyond fossil fuel-driven economies was essential during recovery from coronavirus (Covid-19).

Despite this, many countries are continuing with actions detrimental to the climate. Norway recently gave rights to oil and gas exploration to 30 companies, including Shell. Brazil, whose Paris Agreement target requires them to stop illegal deforestation by 2030, cut down more than 11 thousand sq km of rainforest in 2019-2020.

Catastrophic effects

Meanwhile, the effects of continuing climate change have become ever-more salient over the past year. Scientists warned that 2020 was one of the top three warmest years on record, warning of a “catastrophic” temperature rise.

A new study has found that the rate of ice loss on earth is increasing, raising sea levels and increasing flooding risk.

Extreme weather events have risen significantly since 2000, causing more than a million deaths and huge economic losses. The Global Climate Risk Index 2021 said that extreme weather events hit the poorest countries hardest.

A way forward

While the Paris Agreement holds national governments to account, climate action from organisations outside of it is just as important.

In the US, more than 600 local governments have created plans for climate action, outlining targets for emission reduction.

Cities across the world have joined the Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance, pledging to achieve carbon neutrality in the next 10-20 years.

The support for climate action is ever-growing. But to make any meaningful difference, bottom-up and grassroots action must be supported by more aggressive emission cuts on a national scale. And while the US rejoining the Paris Agreement is welcomed, it’s clear that it needs to go much further if we want to have any chance of saving our planet.

Featured image via Flickr/Gage Skidmore & Pixabay/Medi2Go

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Nothing is ever good enough for some campaigners. They do not want a solution because having something to complain about is an end in itself; their status as pundits depend on it. I am not criticising the many worth campaigners, but those who generate ‘soundbites’ and adopt extreme positions because the media – and, it seems, this site as part of the media does so, too – likes polarised debate, not reasonable discourse, that seeks solutions.

      This kind of thing aids the climate deniers because some people simply shrug and think, ‘why bother, since it’s all a waste of time?’

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.