The US House of Representatives has approved a sweeping police reform bill in the wake of protests over the police killing of George Floyd.
The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act passed largely along party lines but stands little chance of becoming law. It requires a majority vote in the Republican-controlled senate.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gathered with members of the Congressional Black Caucus on the Capitol steps. She challenged opponents not to allow the deaths of Black Americans to have been in vain or the outpouring of public support for changes to go unmatched. Pelosi said:
Exactly one month ago, George Floyd spoke his final words — ‘I can’t breathe’ — and changed the course of history.
She said the Senate faces a choice “to honour George Floyd’s life or to do nothing”.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
On the eve of the vote on 25 June, Donald Trump’s administration said he would veto the bill. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has also said it would not pass.
Republicans are proposing their own bill, and Trump said of the Democratic proposal:
If nothing happens with it, it’s one of those things. We have different philosophies.
In the stalemate over the policing overhaul, the parties are settled into their political zones, almost ensuring no legislation will become law. While there may be apparent outrage over Floyd’s killing, politicians remain far apart on the broader debate over racism in policing and other institutions.
Not far enough
Both Democrat and Republican bills share common elements that could be grounds for a compromise. Central to both would be the creation of a national database of use-of-force incidents, which is viewed as a way to provide transparency on officers’ records if they transfer from one agency to another. Both bills would restrict police chokeholds and set up new training procedures, including increasing the use of body cameras.
The Democratic bill goes further, mandating many of those changes, while also revising the federal statute for police misconduct and holding officers personally liable for damages in lawsuits. It would also halt the practice of sending military equipment to local law enforcement agencies.
Neither bill goes as far as activists want, with calls to defund the police becoming central to the Black Lives Matter movement.Support us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.