Prince Andrew’s been stripped of his military titles. But maybe the military is the right place for him.

Andrew in military regalia
Support us and go ad-free

If I was to say prince Andrew Windsor is something of an oddity, you’d probably look at his family and say “so… like the rest of them then?”. And you wouldn’t exactly be wrong. But what I mean specifically is that unlike most of his military-cosplaying family, he actually did serve in a conflict. In his case, it was the Falklands/Malvinas War as a helicopter pilot.

It was there, he told the BBC (during a now infamous interview meant to offset the impact of abuse allegations), that he suffered an overload of adrenalin which left him allegedly unable to sweat. That unusual claim has since been challenged by his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. Giuffre claims to have been sex trafficked by the now-convicted Ghislaine Maxwell at the direction of the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. She claims she was subsequently sexually abused by the prince – charges he denies.

The latest turn in Windsor’s ongoing scandal of alleged sexual abuse shows something important. That is, like the monarchy, we place the military on a pedestal it does not deserve. As if it’s an institution which represents the very highest moral standards.


It must have stung the duke to lose his titles by order of the queen this week. The duke’s ‘His Royal Highness’ (HRH) title was also rescinded. As a result, he was told he would have to face the coming civil action as a private citizen.

The move followed an open letter to the queen from a group of 150 ex-military members. It asked that the prince be removed from the various honorary military roles he had occupied. So, no more LARPing as a colonel in the Grenadier Guards for Windsor.

Other roles removed include, according to the Guardian:  

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

honorary air commodore of RAF Lossiemouth; colonel-in-chief of the Royal Irish Regiment; colonel-in-chief of the Small Arms School Corps; commodore-in-chief of the Fleet Air Arm; royal colonel of the Royal Highland Fusiliers; deputy colonel-in-chief of the Royal Lancers (Queen Elizabeths’ Own); and royal colonel of the Royal Regiment of Scotland.


150 former military personnel published their open letter on 13 January. The letter was formulated with the anti-monarchist campaign group Republic. In it, the veterans say Windsor’s position was “untenable”:

We are therefore asking that you take immediate steps to strip Prince Andrew of all his military ranks and titles and, if necessary, that he be dishonourably discharged.

Republic’s Graham Smith added:

It is clear for all to see that Prince Andrew has been proven unfit to wear the uniform of any of Britain’s armed forces. That he is able to continue in numerous roles within the military is a disgrace, and an insult to those who continue to serve with distinction.

Martial fantasy

But there’s a problem with these claims. And it isn’t just that it shows how limited and centrist republicanism is in this country. More importantly, there’s no basis whatsoever for the suggestion that the military is adverse to a culture of misogyny, rape, or sexual abuse. If current reports are anything to go by, these issues are endemic.

In 2021, a landmark parliamentary report showed that two-thirds of women service personnel had faced sexual harassment or abuse. As the Guardian had reported, it:

 …features evidence of gang rape, sex for career advancement and trophies to ‘bag the woman’

This was the real face of military culture around women.

Under the rug

MP, veteran, and subcommittee chair for women in the armed forces Sarah Atherton said at the time:

The stories we heard paint a difficult picture for women. A woman raped in the military often has to live and work with the accused perpetrator, with fears that speaking out would damage her career.

She added that:

We heard accusations of senior officers sweeping complaints under the rug to protect their own reputations and careers. While many commanding officers want to do the right thing, it is clear that, too often, female service personnel are being let down by the chain of command.


In October 2021, the Child Rights International Network published figures on sexual violence against young women and girls in the military. These showed a spike in such offences in recent years.

Then in December 2021, measures were proposed as amendments to the Armed Forces Bill 2021. The aim was to make the military a safer place for women. But in the end, key proposals were voted down. And Atherton, who rebelled in the final Commons vote, resigned from her government role.

No moral institution

There’s a problem in the way we look at our major institutions in this country. The truth? Well, neither the monarchy nor the military set a moral example for us. And the notion that the military is too upstanding to have an accused abuser associated with it is wrong. Ultimately, this kind of poorly thought out claim does a disservice to us all.

Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Thorne1983, cropped to 770 x 403, licenced under CC BY-SA 3.0

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. YES, YES, YES in The Military Corrective Training Centre (MCTC) in Colchester, Essex for at least five years! And on the same food that offending soldiers are eating with NO privileges. This slimy piece of work has for years lived off the state in luxury and it is about time he learnt a little about REAL life! The BBC UK page has an article – “Prince Andrew’s lawyers say accuser may have false memories”. Yet it is obvious to me an expert in body language that this is Prince Andrew who has false memories. Many, many years ago, a report was made to me by a member of his staff, that shortly after his divorce from the Duchess, he was found in bed with his ex-valet. Together with quite a number of the members of the Royal family, past and present morality is something they know little about. Being related to both the last real Russian Czar, Pyotr Alekséyevich,7 May 1682 – 8th February 1725 on one side of my family and on the other having a Royal heritage older than Elizabeth Regina’s, which commenced with an unnamed Roman proconsul of Lyon in 206 and in the situation where every king of France was hypothetically related to myself and a cousin of Henry VIII’s was the first Anglican minister, member of my family to be sent to Ireland with vast estates and loads of treasure! So you can see that I am not left-wing, nor ever will be. In my teenage years as a student, (at the age of 13), I was a Communist and atheist and could argue about dialectical materialism with intellectuals of any calibre! It was when I had an experience with the God I did not believe in, and many of you still do not, but I can state categorically with an IQ apparently of 180+++, (according to my school records” that the experience I had with Ruach HaKodesh, (the third person of the Trinity), was, is and will be FACT! If you do not believe you all are full, the Bible says, “the fool has said in his heart, there is no God”! Back to the matter in hand, the intellectually deprived idiot, Andrew, no longer Prince, is arrogant enough to believe he can con people more intelligent than he is. Within minutes of watching him on television during the interview some years ago, it was immediately obvious that he was lying, and he was not very good at it! Is obviously totally ignorant of the fact that everybody sweats, if he did not sweat he would be dead in hours. The shame is that while serving in the Falklands War that the Argentinians did not get hold of him! Personally, I would strip him of his assets and leave him in The Military Corrective Training Centre (MCTC) until he repented!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.