Nicola Sturgeon raises a crucial question about the Syria airstrikes

Nicola Sturgeon at anti-nuke rally

A coalition of the US, UK and France launched airstrikes in Syria on 14 April. The intervention was a response to an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma. The UK Government claims the strikes were directed at targets that would limit the chemical weapon capacity of president Assad’s regime in the country.

Sturgeon condemns intervention

In response, however, Nicola Sturgeon, raised a crucial point. She said that Theresa May hasn’t answered the question of how the military intervention is going to bring “long term peace” to Syria. She also criticised the government’s decision to not consult parliament on the issue:

Sturgeon’s view was supported by other SNP figures. Speaking to the Today programme, Ian Blackford, the SNP’s leader in the UK parliament said:

Read on...

I’m bitterly disappointed that the government seems to have danced to the tune of President Trump, rather than actually waiting to come to parliament to have an informed debate about where we are, and to consider what would be an appropriate response.

He went on to question both the ethics and the effectiveness of the military action:

An individual bombing raid is not going to deal with the issue. It’s not going to deliver peace for Syria. It’s not going to give humanitarian aid to the people in that country. And that’s what we need to focus on. And yes, of course we have to hold people to account. But doing this on a one off basis like this, I’m afraid, really isn’t going to take us much further forward, it’s about making a sure we can make a fundamental difference in Syria. And that’s where we need to get that political consensus both at home and internationally. Because I don’t believe for one minute that the people of the United Kingdom will subscribe to the action that has been taken.

More condemnation

The Labour Party also joined condemnation of the UK government’s action. A statement from Jeremy Corbyn’s Facebook page stated:

This legally questionable action risks escalating further, as US defence secretary James Mattis has admitted, an already devastating conflict and therefore makes real accountability for war crimes and use of chemical weapons less, not more likely.

Similar sentiments have since been shared by other members of the Labour shadow cabinet. Diane Abbott tweeted:

And shadow education secretary Angela Rayner questioned whether airstrikes would act as a deterrent against chemical weapons:

Cross party opposition

Criticism of the military action has been strong among other parties too. Green Party member of the House of Lords Jenny Jones said:

Green Party London assembly member Caroline Russell also commented:

These responses from Green Party figures come after their co-leader, Caroline Lucas, condemned the hypocrisy of western foreign policy on 13 April. Speaking on Radio 4‘s Any Questions, she said:

If we are as concerned as people say we are about the state in Syria, then why is this Government not accepting far more refugees? Why are we not actually having a coherent and consistent foreign policy? Why are we still selling arms to Saudi Arabia, when we know they are going to be used in Yemen?

Plaid Cymru were among those who condemned the action. And the Liberal Democrats criticised prime minister Theresa May for not allowing parliament to vote:

Public opposition

Opposition hasn’t only come from parliament and political parties. A Yougov poll earlier this week found that just one in five people support airstrikes in Syria. There was also a wave of protests in the run up to May launching airstrikes last night.

It’s clear that the Government doesn’t have the support of the public, nor of parliament. This action has been taken without popular consent.

Get Involved!

– Read more articles on Syria.

– Take action against military intervention with Stop the War Coalition.

Featured Image via Garry Knight/Flickr

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed