Nicola Sturgeon raises a crucial question about the Syria airstrikes

Nicola Sturgeon at anti-nuke rally
Support us and go ad-free

A coalition of the US, UK and France launched airstrikes in Syria on 14 April. The intervention was a response to an alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma. The UK Government claims the strikes were directed at targets that would limit the chemical weapon capacity of president Assad’s regime in the country.

Sturgeon condemns intervention

In response, however, Nicola Sturgeon, raised a crucial point. She said that Theresa May hasn’t answered the question of how the military intervention is going to bring “long term peace” to Syria. She also criticised the government’s decision to not consult parliament on the issue:

Sturgeon’s view was supported by other SNP figures. Speaking to the Today programme, Ian Blackford, the SNP’s leader in the UK parliament said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

I’m bitterly disappointed that the government seems to have danced to the tune of President Trump, rather than actually waiting to come to parliament to have an informed debate about where we are, and to consider what would be an appropriate response.

He went on to question both the ethics and the effectiveness of the military action:

An individual bombing raid is not going to deal with the issue. It’s not going to deliver peace for Syria. It’s not going to give humanitarian aid to the people in that country. And that’s what we need to focus on. And yes, of course we have to hold people to account. But doing this on a one off basis like this, I’m afraid, really isn’t going to take us much further forward, it’s about making a sure we can make a fundamental difference in Syria. And that’s where we need to get that political consensus both at home and internationally. Because I don’t believe for one minute that the people of the United Kingdom will subscribe to the action that has been taken.

More condemnation

The Labour Party also joined condemnation of the UK government’s action. A statement from Jeremy Corbyn’s Facebook page stated:

This legally questionable action risks escalating further, as US defence secretary James Mattis has admitted, an already devastating conflict and therefore makes real accountability for war crimes and use of chemical weapons less, not more likely.

Similar sentiments have since been shared by other members of the Labour shadow cabinet. Diane Abbott tweeted:

And shadow education secretary Angela Rayner questioned whether airstrikes would act as a deterrent against chemical weapons:

Cross party opposition

Criticism of the military action has been strong among other parties too. Green Party member of the House of Lords Jenny Jones said:

Green Party London assembly member Caroline Russell also commented:

These responses from Green Party figures come after their co-leader, Caroline Lucas, condemned the hypocrisy of western foreign policy on 13 April. Speaking on Radio 4‘s Any Questions, she said:

If we are as concerned as people say we are about the state in Syria, then why is this Government not accepting far more refugees? Why are we not actually having a coherent and consistent foreign policy? Why are we still selling arms to Saudi Arabia, when we know they are going to be used in Yemen?

Plaid Cymru were among those who condemned the action. And the Liberal Democrats criticised prime minister Theresa May for not allowing parliament to vote:

Public opposition

Opposition hasn’t only come from parliament and political parties. A Yougov poll earlier this week found that just one in five people support airstrikes in Syria. There was also a wave of protests in the run up to May launching airstrikes last night.

It’s clear that the Government doesn’t have the support of the public, nor of parliament. This action has been taken without popular consent.

Get Involved!

– Read more articles on Syria.

– Take action against military intervention with Stop the War Coalition.

Featured Image via Garry Knight/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed