The director general of Universal Credit is facing a massive backlash for his defence of the DWP’s flagship policy

A split screen of the DWP and Universal Credit logos
Support us and go ad-free

The director general of Universal Credit – the flagship policy of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) – is facing a monumental backlash for his defence of the policy.

No comparison

The DWP appointed Neil Couling as the director general of Universal Credit in 2014. Since then, he has overseen the policy’s implementation. On 8 August, he tweeted:

Couling refers to paragraph 2.11 of the National Audit Office’s (NAO) highly critical report on Universal Credit. The paragraph concludes [pdf, p35]:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

in its survey of full service claimants, published on 8 June 2018, the Department found that four in ten claimants that were surveyed stated they were experiencing financial difficulties.

Yet, as there is no analysis of the experiences of people claiming ‘legacy’ benefits, Couling states it’s wrong to infer that “UC [Universal Credit] is causing hardship”. This is because there’s nothing to compare it to.

But people were quick to give Couling the comparisons he seems to have missed. Universal Credit claimant and blogger Alex Tiffin gave Couling some “context”:

And another claimant stated Universal Credit had pushed him into rent arrears:

This is not an isolated issue. In September 2017, the Observer reported that:

rent arrears among tenants receiving universal credit are running at three, four or even five times the level of those on the old system.

What about food banks?

Meanwhile, some referred to the correlation between the rollout of Universal Credit and the rise in food-bank use to conclude that Couling was talking “utter tripe”:

Research by the UK’s biggest food-bank charity – the Trussell Trust – found:

Analysis of foodbanks that have been in full UC rollout areas for a year or more shows that these projects experienced an average increase of 52% in the twelve months after the full rollout date in their area.

And research by Homeless Link found that Universal Credit is contributing to an increase in homelessness among young people.

Yet the fact that Couling is seemingly dismissive of evidence regarding Universal Credit’s effects shouldn’t surprise people. As the Independent reported, he previously:

dismissed a whistleblower’s first-hand account of claimants’ “daily suffering” under the system as “anecdote and opinion”.

And he was accused of “insensitivity” after tweeting multiple pictures of cakes despite Universal Credit claimants going hungry.

Bleak outlook

The Guardian‘s social policy editor, Patrick Butler, retweeted Couling to facilitate discussion around his claim:

The discussion that ensued highlights Couling’s pessimistic understanding of the role of the welfare state:

Revolutionary Nobel prize-winning economist Amartya Sen once pointed [pdf, p9] out that:

Benefits meant exclusively for the poor often end up being poor benefits.

Couling’s comments encapsulate this rather bleak perception of welfare. His argument that Universal Credit shouldn’t be criticised for causing hardship because the last system did too suggests a lack of compassion for those forced to rely on the DWP to live.

Delusional

Welfare campaigner and blogger Charlotte Hughes labelled Couling “delusional”:

Yet many would argue that she’s being kind. The evidence – both anecdotal and from reputable organisations – of Universal Credit causing hardship is plentiful. And Couling’s defence of the benefit in the face of such evidence speaks volumes about the government’s agenda.

Get Involved!

Follow Alex Tiffin’s blog Universal Credit Sufferer.

Read Charlotte Hughes’s blog The Poor Side of Life.

Featured image via UK government – Wikimedia and UK government – Wikimedia 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed