Theresa May nearly lied to the country about Brexit. Again.

Theresa May
Fréa Lockley

On 14 January, Theresa May gave a major speech ahead of the crucial Brexit vote on 15 January. It was May’s final chance to unite a divided party and sell her deal. But a key part of her original speech was based on a complete lie – a fact that she, and the mainstream media, ‘conveniently’ forgot.

“When the people of Wales voted…”

Many people shared extracts of May’s speech ahead of delivery:

When she actually delivered the speech in Stoke, May amended this slightly and said:

When the people of Wales voted by a margin of 0.3%, on a turnout of just over 50%, to endorse the creation of the Welsh Assembly, that result was accepted by parliament.

She omitted the original line in the pre-shared text that the result was “accepted by both sides and the popular legitimacy of that institution has never seriously been questioned”. But there’s still watertight and valid ground to challenge May’s position.


Even in the speech that she gave, May totally failed to acknowledge that she – and many other Tories – actively tried to block the results of the 1997 Welsh referendum.

As Left Foot Forward reported:

In fact, Theresa May and 30 other current Tory MPs voted against the creation of the Welsh Assembly in December 1997 despite the new body being approved by a referendum just three months earlier.

As late as 2005, the Conservative Party offered a second referendum on the Welsh Assembly in its election manifesto.

May trying to use Welsh devolution to encourage people to support her botched Brexit deal wasn’t a clever move. Her edited claim that it was “accepted” clearly doesn’t reflect the full picture.

The New Statesman‘s political editor was one of the first to point this out on social media:

It didn’t take long for Hansard parliamentary records – showing May’s voting record – to appear on social media. As Dr Craig Dalzell, the head of policy & research for Scottish thinktank Common Weal, noted:

Ahead of her speech, many political journalists commented on May’s track record. Even the BBC‘s Laura Kuenssberg called it “awkward”:

Yet not a single journalist – Kuenssberg included – asked May about this in press questions following the speech:

Following May’s speech, Bush said:

Dalzell told The Canary:

The statements made in advance of May’s speech and their subsequent redaction when they were found to be false shows the desperate position that the PM finds herself in. She is obviously still not in command of her own party and clearly knew ahead of time that the mutual letter exchange with the EU wouldn’t materially change anything – the “backstop” remains, as it always has been, the baseline position until and unless another agreement is made.

“Mislead, bluff, bluster, fudge, capitulate and then move on to the next error”

This is not the first time May misled people over Brexit. She’s continued to bend parliamentary rules for her own purposes. In December 2018, MPs “passed a historic motion to hold the government in contempt” in order to force May to publish the Brexit legal advice in full. Labour’s Keir Starmer said, after reading the documents, that it was “unthinkable” May’s government tried to hide them:

Then only days later, May delayed the ‘meaningful vote’ on Brexit until January, because she knew she’d lose.

Dalzell said that, “even in desperate times”, it’s “concerning” that May would even “attempt to mislead people to this degree as if the Internet and other permanent records did not exist and statements could not be checked in real time”. He continued:

It is not, however, surprising. In this single event is an encapsulation of the UK’s entire approach to Brexit from the start. Mislead, bluff, bluster, fudge, capitulate and then move on to the next error. This does not bode well for the next stage of Brexit and the trade negotiations to come.

And he’s quite right. May nearly lied. Yet she, and most establishment media outlets, simply pretended it hadn’t happened, as though a quick edit could fix it all. This is the same woman ‘negotiating’ and (allegedly) leading the UK through one of its most important political moments in history.

Featured image via screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us