Theresa May nearly lied to the country about Brexit. Again.

Theresa May
Support us and go ad-free

On 14 January, Theresa May gave a major speech ahead of the crucial Brexit vote on 15 January. It was May’s final chance to unite a divided party and sell her deal. But a key part of her original speech was based on a complete lie – a fact that she, and the mainstream media, ‘conveniently’ forgot.

“When the people of Wales voted…”

Many people shared extracts of May’s speech ahead of delivery:

When she actually delivered the speech in Stoke, May amended this slightly and said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

When the people of Wales voted by a margin of 0.3%, on a turnout of just over 50%, to endorse the creation of the Welsh Assembly, that result was accepted by parliament.

She omitted the original line in the pre-shared text that the result was “accepted by both sides and the popular legitimacy of that institution has never seriously been questioned”. But there’s still watertight and valid ground to challenge May’s position.


Even in the speech that she gave, May totally failed to acknowledge that she – and many other Tories – actively tried to block the results of the 1997 Welsh referendum.

As Left Foot Forward reported:

In fact, Theresa May and 30 other current Tory MPs voted against the creation of the Welsh Assembly in December 1997 despite the new body being approved by a referendum just three months earlier.

As late as 2005, the Conservative Party offered a second referendum on the Welsh Assembly in its election manifesto.

May trying to use Welsh devolution to encourage people to support her botched Brexit deal wasn’t a clever move. Her edited claim that it was “accepted” clearly doesn’t reflect the full picture.

The New Statesman‘s political editor was one of the first to point this out on social media:

It didn’t take long for Hansard parliamentary records – showing May’s voting record – to appear on social media. As Dr Craig Dalzell, the head of policy & research for Scottish thinktank Common Weal, noted:

Ahead of her speech, many political journalists commented on May’s track record. Even the BBC‘s Laura Kuenssberg called it “awkward”:

Yet not a single journalist – Kuenssberg included – asked May about this in press questions following the speech:

Following May’s speech, Bush said:

Dalzell told The Canary:

The statements made in advance of May’s speech and their subsequent redaction when they were found to be false shows the desperate position that the PM finds herself in. She is obviously still not in command of her own party and clearly knew ahead of time that the mutual letter exchange with the EU wouldn’t materially change anything – the “backstop” remains, as it always has been, the baseline position until and unless another agreement is made.

“Mislead, bluff, bluster, fudge, capitulate and then move on to the next error”

This is not the first time May misled people over Brexit. She’s continued to bend parliamentary rules for her own purposes. In December 2018, MPs “passed a historic motion to hold the government in contempt” in order to force May to publish the Brexit legal advice in full. Labour’s Keir Starmer said, after reading the documents, that it was “unthinkable” May’s government tried to hide them:

Then only days later, May delayed the ‘meaningful vote’ on Brexit until January, because she knew she’d lose.

Dalzell said that, “even in desperate times”, it’s “concerning” that May would even “attempt to mislead people to this degree as if the Internet and other permanent records did not exist and statements could not be checked in real time”. He continued:

It is not, however, surprising. In this single event is an encapsulation of the UK’s entire approach to Brexit from the start. Mislead, bluff, bluster, fudge, capitulate and then move on to the next error. This does not bode well for the next stage of Brexit and the trade negotiations to come.

And he’s quite right. May nearly lied. Yet she, and most establishment media outlets, simply pretended it hadn’t happened, as though a quick edit could fix it all. This is the same woman ‘negotiating’ and (allegedly) leading the UK through one of its most important political moments in history.

Featured image via screengrab

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us