Even the Labour right is scoffing at the Lib Dems after Corbyn plays a political masterstroke
Even Labour right-wingers are scoffing at the Lib Dems after Jeremy Corbyn pushed the party into a corner on preventing a no-deal Brexit. It looks like the cross-party centrists are split.
Corbyn’s plan
The Labour leader issued a plan to stop a no-deal Brexit. In the letter, Corbyn says that MPs should support a vote of no confidence in Boris Johnson, and then vote confidence in a temporary Labour government with the sole purpose of stopping a no-deal Brexit. The new minority Labour government would then extend the Brexit process to create time for a general election.
Lib Dems exposed
The thing is, Lib Dem leader thecanary.co/topics/Jo-Swinson/ rejected the plan on the spot, saying:
We are facing a national crisis, we may need an emergency government to resolve it.
But if Jeremy Corbyn truly wants that to succeed, surely even he can see that he cannot lead it.
There is no way he can unite rebel Conservatives and independents to stop Boris Johnson.
Given that Corbyn is the twice-elected leader of the opposition, however, Swinson’s response implied to many that she isn’t serious about stopping a no-deal Brexit. And even Labour right-wingers like Wes Streeting were unimpressed:
Read on...
As I told @CityAM, @jeremycorbyn’s letter should be treated seriously by everyone committed to stopping no deal. @joswinson and the @LibDems are wrong to reject it outright. It should be the basis for the start of serious talks about how we stop No Deal. https://t.co/1moNz5OVM4
— Wes Streeting MP (@wesstreeting) August 15, 2019
Tory Remainer rebels like Guto Bebb also called for the Lib Dems to rethink. He said:
I think there are other alternatives that are open to us, but I do think that those who have said that they will do anything necessary to stop the long term damage of a no-deal exit must take seriously this type of offer
MPs Dominic Grieve, Oliver Letwin, and Caroline Spelman, and former Conservative Nick Boles, have all said they would meet Corbyn to discuss the plan.
Green MP Caroline Lucas and SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, meanwhile, joined calls for Swinson to change her mind:
To be clear – @theSNP remains willing to work across party lines and explore all options to stop a no deal Brexit. Jeremy Corbyn’s suggestion is not the only possible option – but given the circumstances, nothing should be ruled out at this stage. @joswinson should rethink. https://t.co/n7npDMo0bu
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) August 15, 2019
With potential support from the SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens, Corbyn already has 287 votes to bring down Johnson. 322 is the threshold, meaning he needs another 37 votes.
Fib Dems?
The thing is, the Lib Dems appear to be proving yet again that they aren’t serious about stopping no-deal.
In March, parliament conducted indicative votes to try and find a way forward on the Brexit deadlock. Short of outright revoking Article 50, Corbyn’s Labour supported all the compromise motions to either soften or have a confirmatory vote on Brexit.
The proposition for a customs union compromise lost by just three votes. Other than Norman Lamb MP, the Lib Dems, Change UK, and the SNP all either abstained or voted against it.
“Willing to prop up the Tories”
The Lib Dems faced dismay and ridicule on social media:
Then we need to stop calling the Lib Dems an anti-No Deal party. They're not willing to have a very temporary Corbyn-led government for a few weeks to stop No Deal and call an election, but they were willing to prop up the Tories for five years to wreck the country. https://t.co/KV6FZQy3pX
— Owen Jones🌹 (@OwenJones84) August 15, 2019
So the LibDems:
Don't have a problem with Sarah Wollaston, who supported a ban on HIV positive migrants entering the UK, becoming their MP.
Do have a problem with Jeremy Corbyn being a temporary PM just to extend A50 and call an election.
Get in the bin with such priorities 🚮
— Ana Oppenheim 🌹 (@AnaOpp) August 15, 2019
April 2019:
Pragmatic Ken Clarke: "Let's have a Customs Union"
LibDems: "No thanks, we can't support you"
August 2019:
LibDems: 'We need a pragmatic leader like Ken Clarke who we can support"
Honesty, they're that transparent.
— Matt Thomas #JC4PM (@Trickyjabs) August 15, 2019
Swinson and Umunna appear to believe they decide who a caretaker PM would be, either Ken Clarke or Harriet Harman.
A party that polled at 7.4% in 2017.
The chutzpah would be admirable were it not sinister, delusional and hubristic.
LibDems: pack it in.— simon maginn (@simonmaginn) August 15, 2019
It looks like the Lib Dems were only hard-lining for Remain for their own electoral gain, to undermine Corbyn, and to mask their own lack of vision for society. With Britain facing a Johnson-managed no-deal Brexit, now isn’t the time for such party politicking. We need a general election to sort out Brexit along with the other major issues, like the oncoming climate catastrophe and austerity. With the stakes so high, the Lib Dems are behaving like shameful chancers. They need to cut it out.
Featured image via gilhody/ YouTube, Guardian News/ YouTube, and BBC Newsnight/ YouTube
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Just about any other Labour politician would walk into Downing Street but instead we have Corbyn flailing around. Utterly useless. Whether is the Corbyn mass movement when it really counts?
Fuss over statements by Lib/Dem spokesmen, seemingly self-appointed, must not distract from the objective: to prevent the egregious Johnson playing ducks and drakes with parliamentary procedure and long standing conventions. Opposing Johnson’s presumption and arrogance regarding the matter of ‘no-deal’ Brexit ought be the priority for people caring about the UK’s political stability. It is no longer a matter of ‘Brexit’ versus ‘Remain’ but one of constitutional propriety. Even should it be established, which it has not, that a substantial majority of people favour chaotic exit from the EU, there is no urgency about when.
Options include rescinding Article 50 and starting the Brexit process from scratch or persuading the EU of it being in everyone’s interests to push back the final decision date by six months or a year.
Mr Corbyn has made a sensible suggestion for averting constitutional crisis and thereby reducing risk of civil mayhem. Despite favouring Mr Corbyn as leader of an interim ‘one issue’ government I view fine detail of how common cause is achieved a matter best handled pragmatically. I really don’t care whether Beelzebub is ‘elevated’ to the Lords and called upon to be interim prime minister so long as the one, simple to articulate, aim is achieved.
Sinn Féin MPs ought consider setting aside objections to taking their seats in the Commons: all they are required to do is make an empty promise.
MPs objecting to Johnson’s high handed approach to Brexit must set aside matters of pride, ‘face’, and irrelevant (to this matter) principle, to unite and eject Johnson and his cabinet from office.
Corbyn has a knack of harpooning in his political masterstrokes at opportunistically perfect timing. Quite an impressive politician among this current incompetent shower.
I think Swinson just had another attack of “foot in mouth”…she must have caught it whilst serving in Cameron’s government.
I don’t like the tone of this article and If your editorial line is going to become more hostile towards the Lib Dems, I shall stop my subscription. I have seen the letter that Jo Swinson has sent to JC. If he does have the necessary support from the Conservative MPs then I shall be happy to see him as caretaker PM to stop Brexit. I just hope that Labour can get their own MPs, like Gareth Snell. Ruth Smeath and Kinnock jnr into line.
That’s OK Mike it’s your choice but TBH I don’t think they are too worried about one Libdem cancelling his subs , esp with the latest increase in their paying readership.
Don’t the Fibdems have their own online publication , mind you they couldn’t ever get IMPRESS approval , just too many lies .
Try getting your own Leader in Line with your Partys policy to stop Brexit , this is their chance and she’s spaffing it up the wall.
PS this is a publication for Socialists with Socialist views , something the Libdems are not
I have also read Jo Swinson’s letter to Jeremy Corbyn but it would seem that the author of this article has not. I have enjoyed reading the Canary for a number of years but this article has made me doubt its standards of journalism and whether I can trust what is reported.
Just a reminder to those commenting above about the integrity and honesty of The Canary , it is regulated by IMPRESS, the independent monitor for the press, and adhere to their Standards Code (pdf).
Thus you can rest assured that the content is 100% accurate and certainly more honest that you ever find in any of the MSM and certainly more honest than ANY LIBDEM Leader !!
Is she frightened that Corbyn will de-commission Trident in the 14 days he would be PM? Or is it the thought of working with the head of an institutionalised anti-semitic party that’s putting her off?…either wya Bojois loving it.