Bernie Sanders gives a perfect reason for the US to pull out of endless war in Afghanistan

Bernie Sanders
Ed Sykes

On 19 September, news broke that a US drone strike in Afghanistan had killed around 30 civilians. And presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders said this, among other “horrors of endless war”, was a perfect reason for the US to finally pull out of Afghanistan almost two decades after its 2001 invasion.

This is not the first time the US has killed civilians in Afghanistan, of course. In fact, a July report from the UN said US and allied forces had killed the majority of civilians who died in the first half of 2019.

Overall, at least 75,316 Afghan civilians have died since the 2001 invasion. But it’s easy to forget that if we listen to the pro-war political establishment:

A story of terror

The invasion of Afghanistan marked the start of Washington’s disastrous ‘war on terror’. But the terrorism it was purportedly fighting grew largely from decades of destructive US foreign policy. And despite counterproductive attacks on AfghanistanIraq and Libya (along with heavy meddling in Syria and elsewhere), this terrorism has – if anything – grown stronger.

This seems to be official policy, though. Because for decades, Western governments have backed ultra-conservative extremists against secular anti-colonial forces. And they keep doing the same thing, despite the inevitably catastrophic results.

During the Cold War, the US and its allies didn’t try to counter Soviet-style rule by encouraging progressive democracy. Instead, they undermined democratic movements while backing some of the most ultra-conservative, elitist forces going. For example:

  • The CIA-backed coup in Iran in 1953 – as author Mark Gasiorowski says – “[took] out the moderate, secular, element of Iranian politics and enabled radical Islamists”. Historian Mark Curtis, meanwhile, insists that co-conspirator Britain actually manipulated radical Islamist forces to “counter the threat to British interests” from secular progressives.
  • Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Steve Coll, meanwhile, claims Britain once supported the Muslim Brotherhood to challenge secular forces in Egypt; and that Israel once covertly backed Hamas to weaken secular Palestinian forces.
  • In the 1980s, the CIA coordinated ultra-conservative efforts to defeat secular forces in Afghanistan; and Osama bin Laden was one of the extremists to benefit. Key US ally Saudi Arabia also provided billions in funding for this campaign.
  • The ongoing war in Syria has in many ways been Afghanistan 2.0, with extremist militants receiving overt and covert support from the US and its allies.
Stop US imperialism

Apart from undermining their international opponents, Western governments also give their full support to brutal regimes in places like Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey. The Saudi dictatorship in particular has long used billions of its petrodollars to spread its extreme state ideology of Wahhabism around the world. Indeed, both al-Qaeda and Daesh (Isis/Isil) follow this ideology, and one senior Qatari official has even said the latter began as “a Saudi project“. There is also consistent evidence that the Saudi regime fuels terror around the world.

To stop global civilian deaths and suffering, the US must not only pull out of Afghanistan. It must also end its support for human-rights-abusing allies. And it must respect the right of all countries to make their own decisions.

US imperialism must end. And a Sanders presidency could be the first step towards making that happen.

Featured image via Gage Skidmore

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Syria has been the most misreported war in living memory. Yes, US imperialism must end; its demise would come quickly if enough people knew the extent to which we have colluded, since the ’60s, with Radical Islam – the extent to which we have backed Wahabism as a counterforce to Arab nationalism and used the Jihadists which that spawned, irrespective of their motives, their ideology or their depravity, for short term gain in the struggle to protect massive private vested interests in oil – inexpensive boots on the ground, as the article says, for which we are not, according to western media, responsible. Until that perception changes and the reality becomes common knowledge, they will continue to engage with the very forces that threaten us domestically, as the bombing of Manchester Arena tragically demonstrates, carried out, as it was, by LIFG inspired activists, after the LIFG became our preferred proxy in the campaign to remove Gaddafi.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.