MPs call for UK to ‘stand against’ NATO member’s invasion of northern Syria

Lloyd Russell-Moyle speaking in parliament
Support us and go ad-free

NATO’s second largest army is currently on the verge of invading northern Syria. And a cross-party group of MPs has called for the UK to “steadfastly stand against” this invasion as “an immediate and grave priority”.

UK must oppose Syria invasion

The All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on North East Syria recently visited the region (aka Rojava). And amid intensifying threats from NATO member Turkey, the APPG condemned “what would be an illegal Turkish invasion of a neighbouring state”. It also pointed out that:

  • Rojava played a “key” role in defeating Daesh (Isis/Isil) in Syria.
  • The Turkish invasion “is likely to lead to ethnic cleansing” – as reportedly happened after Turkey and its far-right allies occupied another part of northern Syria in 2018.
  • The resulting war “could create millions of refugees and drag on for years”.
  • Turkey could use detained Daesh fighters as “bargaining chips against British interests”.
  • Rojava’s resistance to the invasion “could perversely place Britain under a treaty obligation against its own allies… to protect a NATO member”.

And it insisted that Britain should use its international influence to “prevent” the invasion.

The APPG’s chair Lloyd Russell-Moyle, meanwhile, asked the UK government:

will we now suspend security and intelligence information with Turkey so they can’t use it against one of our allies?

No more UK support for ‘war criminal’ Turkey

Rojava is a multi-ethnic but mostly Kurdish part of Syria. Since early on in Syria’s war, the region has led a green democratic revolution. Its system is feminist, socialist, and opposes all religious discrimination. And it has played a key role in defeating Daesh in Syria, gaining limited support from the West in the process.

Turkey also has a large Kurdish population, and is currently at war with Kurdish communities both at home and abroad because of their demands for self-determination. According to the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal, it has committed numerous war crimes in the process. And despite its consistent attacks against Rojava, Turkey’s Western allies have long turned a blind eye.

As Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) wrote in a press release on 7 October:

Despite its authoritarian domestic policy, and increasingly aggressive foreign policy, the [Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] regime in Turkey is among the world’s largest recipients of UK weapons.

Since August 2014, it said, “the UK has licensed £1.1 billion worth of arms to Turkey”. And CAAT’s Andrew Smith insisted that:

By arming the Turkish military, the UK Government is making itself complicit in how those weapons are used. The UK must stop aiding Turkey’s human rights abuses with arms sales and political support.

Stand up for peace. Stand up for Rojava.

It’s a good sign that UK MPs are calling on the government to stand against Turkey’s invasion of Rojava. But when the UK has sold the Turkish regime weapons in recent years despite allegations of war crimes and ethnic cleansing, we shouldn’t expect a sudden change of heart. Instead, we need to raise our voices and act.

Featured image via Twitter – Lloyd Russell-Moyle

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. NATO is complicit as well, and is no longer a useful instrument of peace in the face of aggression as it was for WW2. 70 years later it has become the aggressor it was designed to confront.
      What happened to its mission?
      Interesting how it become the creature it abhorred.
      It looked into the mirror with vanity, and lost its mind.
      Time to stop intelligence sharing /membership with NATO is the only way for having a sense of unity for humanity.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.