BBC presenter forces Brexit secretary to reveal an alarming fact about the new deal live on TV

Brexit secretary Steve Barclay on BBC Breakfast
Tracy Keeling

On 19 October, BBC Breakfast‘s Charlie Stayt forced the Brexit secretary to reveal an alarming fact about post-Brexit deal Britain.

Stayt pressed Stephen Barclay on what assessments the government had done on the economic impact of Boris Johnson’s new deal. The government expects MPs to vote on this deal imminently. Barclay’s answer suggested the government has done no impact assessments, and therefore has no idea what Britain will look like after the deal comes into force.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.




Wide open

On BBC Breakfast, Stayt asked Barclay:

Have you done specific analysis on what this agreement would mean for the UK economy?

Barclay replied:

Well, the deal was only reached on Thursday, and the Benn legislation requires us to bring that details [sic] back to the house today.

The BBC presenter sought clarification:

So you haven’t had time to do the analysis?

The Brexit secretary again raised the length of time – two days – since his government agreed the deal with the EU. He continued:

the analysis can’t take on board what the EU would do in the future. It can’t take on board what decisions the UK government would take in response to that ,and also it can’t address what would happen in the rest of the world.

In short, Barclay appeared to confirm his government has done little analysis of the economic impact of its proposed deal. He then essentially blamed the “Benn legislation” – introduced by Labour MP to eliminate the chances of a no-deal Brexit – for that lack of analysis. And he finished off by effectively arguing that analysis is pointless anyway because it can’t “take on board” everything that will happen everywhere in the future.

Missing

Conspicuously missing from his answer was any explanation why his government didn’t undertake analysis of what impact the terms of the deal would have before agreeing them with the EU. Such advance analysis was particularly important in this case because the government itself knew well in advance that the Benn Act required it to put any deal to parliament by 19 October.

An explanation on how Tory ministers have the brass to suggest analysis is irrelevant on national TV while paying private consultancy firms millions of taxpayers’ cash for advisory services, including analysis, wasn’t forthcoming either.

There’s concern among many about Johnson’s ability to deliver a deal that works for the majority of Britons. Barclay’s performance on BBC Breakfast shows people are right to be worried.

Featured image via screengrab/Twitter

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support