On 19 October, BBC Breakfast‘s Charlie Stayt forced the Brexit secretary to reveal an alarming fact about post-Brexit deal Britain.
Stayt pressed Stephen Barclay on what assessments the government had done on the economic impact of Boris Johnson’s new deal. The government expects MPs to vote on this deal imminently. Barclay’s answer suggested the government has done no impact assessments, and therefore has no idea what Britain will look like after the deal comes into force.
Just watch. Brexit Secretary @SteveBarclay stating *no economic impact assessments* have been carried out.
His excuse “we only had 2 days.”
— Dr Lauren Gavaghan (@DancingTheMind) October 19, 2019
On BBC Breakfast, Stayt asked Barclay:
Have you done specific analysis on what this agreement would mean for the UK economy?
Well, the deal was only reached on Thursday, and the Benn legislation requires us to bring that details [sic] back to the house today.
The BBC presenter sought clarification:
So you haven’t had time to do the analysis?
the analysis can’t take on board what the EU would do in the future. It can’t take on board what decisions the UK government would take in response to that ,and also it can’t address what would happen in the rest of the world.
In short, Barclay appeared to confirm his government has done little analysis of the economic impact of its proposed deal. He then essentially blamed the “Benn legislation” – introduced by Labour MP to eliminate the chances of a no-deal Brexit – for that lack of analysis. And he finished off by effectively arguing that analysis is pointless anyway because it can’t “take on board” everything that will happen everywhere in the future.
Conspicuously missing from his answer was any explanation why his government didn’t undertake analysis of what impact the terms of the deal would have before agreeing them with the EU. Such advance analysis was particularly important in this case because the government itself knew well in advance that the Benn Act required it to put any deal to parliament by 19 October.
An explanation on how Tory ministers have the brass to suggest analysis is irrelevant on national TV while paying private consultancy firms millions of taxpayers’ cash for advisory services, including analysis, wasn’t forthcoming either.
There’s concern among many about Johnson’s ability to deliver a deal that works for the majority of Britons. Barclay’s performance on BBC Breakfast shows people are right to be worried.
Featured image via screengrab/Twitter
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?