Laura Kuenssberg is set straight as she praises the Tories for restoring the government in Northern Ireland

Laura Kuenssberg & Julian Smith FINAL
Peadar O'Cearnaigh


On 11 January at 1pm, Stormont (north of Ireland parliament) reopens. This is welcome news for local people who haven’t had a government since January 2017 and whose public services began to “decay” as a result.

So it surprised people when the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg heaped praise on the Conservative government in London and the Northern Ireland secretary Julian Smith. She made no reference at all to local people. But she was soon put straight.

Her intervention

Kuenssberg’s biased intervention hardly even mentioned local representatives. So when people took to social media, they reminded her of this and the need to remain impartial:

While another person reminded Kuenssberg of other Tory “early achievements”:

Then one other person noted how the Tories’ close relationship with the DUP may have stalled this from happening much sooner:

What it meant to have no government

There’s an implicit insult in Kuenssberg’s praise for the government. And it isn’t an insult simply because of decaying public services. It’s an insult because it ignores the people who suffered because of that decay. Stormont’s closure has “exacerbated”, the north’s “shocking” suicide rates. They’re much higher for both men and women than anywhere else in Ireland or the UK.

Additionally, women’s rights have suffered as legislation to protect against coercive control doesn’t apply here. And school budgets have decreased in real terms.

Threat follows deal announcement

On 9 January, the tánaiste (Irish deputy prime minister) Simon Coveney and Smith announced a deal to get Stormont “up and running”. But no sooner had they made this announcement than trade union Unison highlighted Smith was actually “holding the people of Northern Ireland to ransom”. Smith threatened to withhold extra money for local workers when he said:

There is no money coming unless the executive gets up and running.

One quick-witted response to Unison’s statement highlighted another reality:

Threatening the pay of health workers to pressure local parties into making a deal is worthy of contempt, not praise.

Why Stormont closed

Stormont closed its doors in January 2017 following deputy first minister Martin McGuinness’s resignation. McGuinness resigned due to first minister Arlene Foster’s involvement in the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) financial scandal.

Since then there have been failed attempts to reopen it. And in the meantime, health workers, whose pay Smith threatened, had to take strike action to demand pay parity with workers in the UK. Additionally, legislation dating back to 1737 has banned Irish speakers from using their native language in court. This is all to become history.

Reality check

So while Kuenssberg rushed to praise the Westminster government, it’s local people who need praise. Because they are the ones who have suffered over the last three years and more. And it’s local people who’ll have to live with the consequences of the new Stormont.

Featured image via YouTube – BBC News & Twitter – RTE News

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments

    2. It couldn’t of been due to the Conservatives as they were in power in 2017.
      It must be for other reasons. I guess she didn’t inquire as to why it has begun again., and by whom.
      You’d think a news service would do this kind of reporting.
      Laura is thinking in different ways we haven’t been versed on by the BBC.
      Why is it?
      The BBC says they are apolitical, and try their absolute best to be so.
      What is going on here???
      AM I DUMB?
      Has a new approach by the BBC to news begun?
      I feel uniformed by their news policy somehow.

      Report comment

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.

Related articles