The London Metropolitan Police has announced plans to roll out facial recognition technology. As part of these plans, suspects will go on “watchlists” and will be approached by officers if spotted on cameras.
Civil liberties group Big Brother has criticised the decision, saying it’s “an enormous expansion of the surveillance state and a serious threat to civil liberties in the UK”. And there are also concerns about the accuracy of the technology used. Big Brother director Silkie Carlo said the rollout:
flies in the face of the independent review showing the Met’s use of facial recognition was unlawful, risked harming public rights and was 81% inaccurate.
This is a breathtaking assault on our rights and we will challenge it, including by urgently considering next steps in our ongoing legal claim against the Met and the Home Secretary.
As well as the issue of civil liberties, there are serious concerns about how the software will impact BAME communities. The racism inherent in facial recognition software has been well-reported. What’s more, overly-surveilled groups such as Muslims, Black people and Asian people are at even greater risk:
Do you know how many studies and research has shown that live facial recognition technology is literally designed and created with the same biases as humans have? So basically it’ll just discriminate against black and brown faces the same way. https://t.co/gF6jcb16kJ
— . (@LGolXXI) January 24, 2020
Oh (Big) brother! Expecting the *Met police*—with their history of racist antics—to all of a sudden listen to researchers and experts who’ve said facial recognition in this manner isn’t advanced enough to fulfil its duty without discriminating against non–White people is naive https://t.co/qjKb24dPYJ
— Niger • wooow u said the n-word (@ntyyst) January 24, 2020
What’s more, Met Police’s announcement came in the same week it was reported that the EU is considering a ban on facial recognition “to prevent the technology being abused”:
Met Police announcing they're rolling out technology so flawed that the European Commission are considering a ban on it, a proposal even supported by tech giants like Google. Support all resistance to the blanket use of facial recognition in policing. https://t.co/jNztV6OsVE
— Moya Lothian-Mclean (@mlothianmclean) January 24, 2020
Sadly, the misuse of facial recognition to criminalise minorities and vulnerable groups is not merely hypothetical. Examples already abound of how facial recognition has been misused, for instance in China with the targeting of Uyghur Muslims and other minorities:
Facial recognition tech doesnt help prevent crime, is fundamentally racist by design, is currently being used to enforce segregation/an ongoing cultural genocide in China and is now being actively implemented by The Metropolitan Police
— Luke P (@thelukeprentice) January 24, 2020
Similarly, in August 2019, misuse of facial recognition against Black people in the US city of Detroit came to light. Immigration rights groups have also flagged serious concerns over the way US immigration control has used the technology:
Facial recognition is literally being used as a means to remove tenants and migrants, from public, affordable, rent-stabilised housing, potentially as a means of enforcing evictions, but you want to talk about “safety” https://t.co/171CsD8Nv2
— hanny (@han8y) January 24, 2020
Black mirror except will be a dystopia for black and brown people so no one cares https://t.co/3LvWhGgoXk
— Asyia Iftikhar (@asyiaiftikhar) January 24, 2020
So for those worried about the use of facial recognition signalling a dystopian future, there’s bad news. For criminalised communities and People of Colour, that future is already here.
Featured image via Piqsels
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?