Trump champions regime-change efforts in 2020 State of the Union address

Donald Trump with Nancy Pelosi clapping behind him
Support us and go ad-free

Donald Trump just gave the annual ‘State of the Union’ address to the US Congress. Critics have widely panned it for resembling more of a campaign rally than its traditional purpose of presenting the president’s legislative priorities and budget proposals to lawmakers and the wider public. But while this is true, the establishment Democrat figures leading the attack have no moral standing when it comes to some of Trump’s worst policy stances – such as his ongoing commitment to regime-change efforts abroad.

Impeachment bitterness

Trump delivered the address to a joint session of both chambers of the US Congress. This came less than two months after its lower chamber – the House of Representatives – voted to impeach him for ‘abuse of power’ and ‘obstruction of congress’. And in a sign of his bitterness toward the Democrats who pushed impeachment, Trump refused to shake the hand of House speaker Nancy Pelosi as he entered the chamber. In response, Pelosi tore up her copy of the speech toward the end of the proceedings.

The speech also came just days before the Senate is expected to vote on whether to remove Trump from office. Given that the vote in the House was almost entirely on partisan lines and that Trump’s own Republican Party holds a majority in the Senate, he is widely expected to be acquitted.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
Typical Trumpian lies and bluster

Trump’s speech was littered with the lies and bluster that has come to be expected from the former reality TV star and shady businessman. He claimed, for instance, that his administration is working to protect patients from being denied treatment due to pre-existing conditions when in reality his administration has been working through the courts to do the exact opposite. His boasts about the buoyant state of the economy, meanwhile, were grossly embellished. While the US economy has seen some growth in recent years, Trump did not ‘rescue’ it from a deep slump during the Barack Obama presidency.

The feature that perhaps most turned heads was Trump’s bestowal of the Presidential Medal of Freedom – the country’s highest civilian honor – on the notorious far-right radio shock-jock Rush Limbaugh, who was a central figure in the ‘birther’ movement and has frequently made sexist, racist, and homophobic comments during his decades-long radio show.

Bipartisan consensus on regime change

Despite establishment Democrats’ posturing against Trump, they appeared to be in lockstep on some his administration’s major policies. When Trump hailed Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaidó – who attended the event in person – as the “true and legitimate president of Venezuela”, most congress members of both major parties took part in a standing ovation, including Nancy Pelosi. Other establishment Democrats also applauded when Trump boasted about the illegal assassination of top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani.

No one should be surprised, though. Because for decades, there has been an overwhelming bipartisan consensus in favour of Washington’s imperialist agenda of regime change and trampling over international law. Only a handful of progressive Democrats in Congress, such as Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have spoken out against US meddling in Venezuela or its hypocritical hostility towards Iran. Establishment Democrats, meanwhile, have been cheerleading alongside Trump on Venezuela and criticizing Middle East policy only on thin procedural grounds.

A long historical precedent

And this is nothing new. The Democratic establishment has been just as implicated in imperialist warmongering as the Republicans. Obama, for instance, ordered ten times more drone strikes than his predecessor George W. Bush. His secretary of state Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, essentially helped a right-wing coup in Honduras to succeed.

During the Vietnam War, some of the worst atrocities took place during the Democratic presidencies of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. In fact, it eventually fell to a Republican, Richard Nixon, to end the war in 1975. Likewise, Democrat Bill Clinton oversaw military intervention in the Balkans and the bombing of a pharmaceuticals factory in Sudan.

The real resistance

Trump’s presidency certainly has degenerated into a wretched horror show. But it would be wrong to think establishment Democrats represent a genuine alternative. Only the newly invigorated progressive wing of the party can provide a real resistance to the decades-long bipartisan consensus in favor of corporatism, imperialism, and war.

Featured image via YouTube.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us