The government is about to run a deportation flight to Jamaica. Up to 50 people may be on it. It claims they’re not British citizens. But given the Tories’ history of racist and classist policies, people are furious. So campaign groups have organised vital action to stop it.
Jamaica deportation flight: they need your support
As the Morning Star reported, the flight is due to leave on 11 February. But there is growing outcry over this, because campaigners claim that among those facing deportation are people who have lived in the UK most of their lives. So two groups have organised a demo outside Downing Street. It starts at 6pm on 6 February. They are BARAC UK and BAME Lawyers for Justice:
As the campaigners wrote:
Up to 50 people could be deported on this flight, people who will be torn apart from families including children, who have lived most of their lives in the UK and including people who are going through appeals with the Home Office.
The flight has also caught the attention of MPs. But the background to this story raises many, larger issues.
A growing storm
Labour MP Nadia Whittome asked the PM if he would “suspend” the flight:
2 years since the Windrush scandal, and before the Lessons Learned Review is published, the government plans to deport 50 people to Jamaica next week.
Boris Johnson refuses to suspend the flight because he says they are all criminals.
— Nadia Whittome MP (@NadiaWhittomeMP) February 5, 2020
Johnson brushed the issue aside, claiming:
I think the whole House will understand that the people of this country will think it right to send back foreign national offenders.
But campaigners and MPs dispute the idea that these people are all criminals. Another Labour MP, Dawn Butler, said one of the men was:
convicted under the now unlawful joint enterprise rule.
The Home Office have briefed that everyone on the deportation flight are serious criminals. I don't think this is true and this planned flight must now be halted until everyone is checked. We cannot allow the Tory hostile environment to continue. pic.twitter.com/k8gW81HM5b
— (((Dawn Butler))) (@DawnButlerBrent) February 5, 2020
The joint enterprise rule allowed judges to convict people of crimes such as murder. The rule was used in situations where someone was involved, but did not actually kill the victim. As the Guardian reported, in 2016, the Supreme Court said that judges had been “wrongly interpreting” the law. This has led to people raising questions about a number of convictions using the rule.
Human rights breaches?
Also, the people the government wants to ‘send back’ to Jamaica have had limited access to phones:
1/ people detained at Harmondsworth have raised concerns that the phone lines are down. Once detained pwrsonal phones are taken and a basic phone issued. The detention centre say the phones are down due to some problem with antennas /masts & that this is caused by @LycamobileUK
— BARAC (@BARACUK) February 5, 2020
The High Court has ordered home secretary Priti Patel to sort the issue out, which is inhibiting detainees from contact with their lawyers and families.
But the bigger picture here involves the Windrush scandal. As Whittome said, the government still hasn’t finished its “lessons learned” review. So it can’t yet adequately ‘learn the lessons’ from its mistakes and apply that understanding in these people’s cases.
Chair of BARAC UK Zita Holbourne told The Canary:
We have seen too many cases where people have been wrongly denied recourse to public funds and access to justice and sometimes wrongly deported with tragic consequences for them and their families.
So, we call upon the government to abandon the deeply racist hostile environment, ‘deport now, appeal later’ immigration policy that has and continues to cause so much heartbreak and injustice.
We say that all such deportations should cease, until the publication of the Windrush lessons learned report and the full implementation of its recommendations and until there has been a full independent inquiry into the Windrush scandal.
We’ve been here before
This has all happened before. As The Canary reported, in February 2019 the government deported 35 people to Jamaica. It claimed none of them were of the Windrush generation. But campaigners disputed this. Campaign group Movement for Justice said some of the people came here as children. Others had direct lineage to the Windrush generation:
BREAKING: buses left Harmondsworth. Two busses & several vans – have lost contact with most of 26 detainees we’ve been speaking to. couple have managed 2 call using escort phones. reminder of people @sajidjavid deporting 2day #Enddeportations #StopCharterflights #Jamaica50 pic.twitter.com/AlS4HjAGgm
— Movement for Justice (@followMFJ) February 6, 2019
Racism and classism
The Windrush scandal and subsequent deportation flights generally only hit a certain demographic. That is, poorer black people. As the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs noted, there was “public outcry” over the obvious institutionalised racism apparent in the scandal. But the government’s attitude to the Windrush generation was also “classist“. Grime artist Marci Phonix highlighted this in 2018.
You are not coming from the same place I’m coming from. You don’t represent the same people I represent. You would not know. And you don’t care… It’s a job for you… This is reality for me.
So, the protest over the deportation flight on 6 February is crucial. Because the more pressure we apply on the government the better. But after the protest, there’s still more work to be done. Because the ‘hostile environment’ clearly still exists. And if we thought we’d seen the worst of Windrush, it may well not be over yet.
Featured image via The Telegraph/YouTube
Find out more at the deportation flight demo.
Support BARAC UK’s refugee solidarity crowdfunder.
Sign its petition about deportation flights.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?